Health Care Reform and Debate That Never Happened
Mr. Hancock first quotes Paul Krugman, a fellow whom I have harshly criticized, both in writing and on my Internet talk radio show. Even the most meritorious of ideas will have its share of oafs littering the parade route, and Dr. Krugman's unconscionable intellectual prostitution for countries that massively undervalue their currencies against the U.S. dollar qualifies for the blue ribbon parade award for the Float That Should Be Shot, notwithstanding his Nobel Prize in economics this year (a prize previously granted to the very epitome of oafishness on the speaking tour parade, the late Right-wing extremist and howlingly lackluster "intellectual," Milton Friedman).
One comment, written by someone using the pseudonym "MrRational," on Mr. Hancock's article struck me:
I still remain opposed to the entire scheme.
Corporate and Government are two sides of the same nannyism coin. Neither can be expected to solve anything for us.
But to the degree that either is allowed a brief or responsibility...
make it a narrowly focused one.
there are three basic levels/categories of care:
1) the 80% that constitutes everyone's day to day uses which should be paid for out of pocket (by most of us) on a fee for service basis to the provider we choose. (and yes, people with some conditions can expect to pay more for that basic care than people who don't have those conditions.)
2) the 10 % that will occasionally crop up beyond those routine year to year expenses that we can mitigate the budget impact of by having some back stop insurance (or an HSA) which we also pay for on our own and most will use very similarly to how we use our homeowner or auto insurance.
3) The 10% that NO ONE can reasonably expect to afford or in most instance to even insure against privately. These catastrophic and traumatic bankrupting expenses are the perfect category for and reasonable limit to a government plan with a tax supported 100% actuarial base.
If we are willing to be truly honest we can add a fourth category:
4) Stop pretending that anyone gets out alive by refusing to flog and abuse our elderly loved ones and call it medicine.
We can make it more complicated but there is no reason to.
I have not had much success in recent years with getting my comments I write published at reputable Websites. The Leftist site truthout.org — persistently begging for donations while doing little more than republishing other sites' content — will not post any comment I write, The Huffington Post only rarely lets one of my comments through, and the same goes for CNN.com; hence, I no longer bother visiting these sites much. Long-time readers here at The Dark Wraith Forums know very well that my style of writing does not include the use of profanity or unrealistically hyperbolic literary imagery unless in the service of occasional satire.
Okay, I did use an obscenity, a profanity, and several vulgarities in writing about Paris Hilton's early release from incarceration; in my own weak defense, however, once in a blue moon, the mockery of uniform rule of law that is the American justice system bunches my boxers. As a broad principle, however, I write what could be published just about anywhere children would not be a target audience.
Still, I get censored. My short-lived gig writing for OpEdNews is over: one of the sneering, Leftist editors there got appallingly nasty in rejecting an article I subsequently published here to the usual, decent number of hits. The Institutional Liberal Manual of Style seems to be widely available to dwarfs at places like truthout.org and other caves on the Left Bank of the American river of ideological polarization. (As an aside, in a few days I shall republish excerpts from that article because those sentiments I expressed there are every bit as timely now as they were in the late Winter when I first wrote them.)
With all of the above as admittedly somewhat unshaped background, I nevertheless offered a follow-on comment at Jay Hancock's Blog. To my surprise, it was published this morning in unedited form.
I am herewith offering it to my own readers here at my online properties of Dark Wraith Publishing to the purpose of providing one more means by which I may speak to the debate over health care reform.
The comment by "MrRational" is worthwhile, although I have no particular use for the idea that we cannot take care of the poor, especially the children in this condition, who need basic medical services but who cannot afford to have them on a readily available basis. As a quite affluent society, we can surely afford to take care of people whose earnings make keeping body and soul together a challenge, and those people will number in the many millions, even in an industrialized society such as ours so long as we choose a form of economic organization where there are winners and losers, as well as stark differences in the long-term, even inter-generational fortunes of those two groups.
It is most unfortunate that a "progressively conservative" approach to reform was never in the cards for the debate in Washington; however, as a purely academic exercise, I note three major points that are missing in Mr. Rational's comment.
First and foremost is the matter of price transparency. Doctors, medical centers, and hospitals all hide their prices, which thwarts the very foundation of competition that would cabin those prices within an envelope formed by profitability and affordability. As a professor, I make a big issue of this. Price transparency is crucial if the demand and supply sides are to discover prices that clear markets efficiently; but no serious federal or state proposals have been fielded to mandate publicly available price disclosures for a standard list of medical services and treatments.
Second — and this point goes far, far beyond the health care industry — we are using antitrust laws written in the first half of the 20th Century to deal with markets of the 21st Century and the market power of concentrated industries in an age where "deregulation" has allowed the argument for scale economies to sway regulatory oversight despite overwhelmingly larger, social and economic interests that are harmed by compacted industries. The Federal Trade Commission frets about "unfair and deceptive" advertising, it uses antiquated metrics like the HHI to measure market concentration, and it chases market concentrators after they've become too large to bust (as in the case of Microsoft, and as in the case now of Google).
Third, and finally, the rampant lack of education in basics of economics and business allows far too many people to get by with no understanding of such concepts as "moral hazard" and "adverse selection." This ensures a debate where only Right-wing conservatives bring up these ideas, and usually in offensive ways, making the underlying concepts as loathsome as everything else Right-wing conservatives talk about. If we are to have a truly informed debate, it would be so much better if the dancing, naked clowns of the Right (as I've called them in my writings) would shut up so the legitimate points they are mimicking could be brought up by people who aren't dancing, naked clowns.
Unfortunately, as it now stands, the only health care "reform" being discussed is really just health care repair, and it's sloppy repair done by self-serving politicians. Some things never change.
That's politics.
For the record, I am opposed to the health care reform bill in the form that the U.S. House of Representatives has just passed. I will sharpen my attack as time goes on, but I can assure readers here that those Right-wing clowns in the entertainment industry, along with their Republican sidekicks in Congress, will never be outside the scope of my criticism, either. Nothing irritates me more than intellectual fools and entertainment industry charlatans. They make legitimate debate next to impossible, so I hold them in particular contempt, even as I do the same for the Democrats in Congress who don't have the guts to write a genuine health care reform bill, much less a real, comprehensive overhaul of this country's miserably failed antitrust, financial services, and privacy laws.
I shall write what is on my mind and leave to the Democrats such ideals as compromise and accommodation, which those same Democrats over the past decade have turned into rank, disgraceful appeasement by another name.
The Dark Wraith is officially on yet another roll.
Comments
Wrote konagod:
Wrote trog69:
Afternoon, fellers. Mr. Kucinich and his exceptionally luscious wife agree most wholeheartedly with you, which is why he voted no on the HC"R" bill. I guess he and she ( Though she's been silent in this latest communication, I just wanted to have an excuse to roll her image around on the tip of my mind, okay?) did the math and determined that when negotiations start by leaving out 50% of the toughest and most meaningful reform proposals, and then accede to 5/8ths of the demands of those who oppose any real change of status quo, why waste everyone's time riding a parade float with all the tires flat, and one of the rims catching the bunting on fire?
Wrote trog69:
Almost forgot; While reading a thread on Fark concerning an article misrepresenting the amount of sea level rise attributed to a speech by Al Gore, I found this gem:
Can't we just start storing the excess water in a lock box(?)
Giltric 2009-10-31 12:14:12 PM
Wrote Father Tyme:
trog,
Yer tryin' ta make fun o' somebudy, right? Heck! We's got the teknology right now ta freeze up all that water 'n ship it up north 'n when it thaws, freeze it again!
Or:
How 'bout we reopen Project MoHole but make it bigger and store all that there water under the earth's crust? It would even warm up 'n we could recycle it to use 'nstead o' any of that foreign "earl!"
And if that don't work:
Use coal generated power to seperate them there molly-kyules in to Hydrogen and Oxseegin and we kin have lots of power and stuff to breathe when that pole-ushum gits bad.
Heck ,man! Don't them sientists no nuttin'?
'n um shure the Repubicans will git on board oncet they find out HelluvaBurton and "The Dick"is involved!
Let's git 'r dun!
Oh, 'n don't ya worry none 'bout the cost. Them there O-ree-entals will kindly lend us all the bucks we need!
Wrote kelley b:
You aren't alone in being banned from reputable websites, Sir Wraith.
Paul Krugman had me banned from The New York Pravda comments a couple of years ago. And not general commenting, either: just his column.
It's really something of a badge of honor.
Wrote Dark Wraith:
Imagine, if you will, banning the regular commenters here. This site would be nothing without the eclectic legion that makes this all-night diner a regular stop on the highway to oblivion.
The Dark Wraith should probably offer free rooms to regulars on the nights when the zombies are especially active in the region.
Wrote trog69:
trog,
Yer tryin' ta make fun o' somebudy, right?
How long must I endure these insufferably moronic attempts to undermine my unswerving dedication to building up rather than tearing down others?
Wrote Father Tyme:
December 21, 2012!
Wrote trog69:
Just in case anyone doubted that we have the corporate-lite version of government at the moment, the unemployment bill that extends benefits to those lowlifes that are too lazy to find work, to the tune of $2.4billion, also includes a tax-rebate for losses to business that amounts to $10.4billion.
Thus, tax and spend Dems appease the tax-cut and spend Republicans with the one thing they have in common.
http://washingtonindependent.com/67005/texas-dem-calls-latest-stimulus-corporate-giveaway
Padre, you're not fooling me. Folks, Father Tyme and Father Christmas have been in a running feud for quite a spell. FT would love nothing better than for the world to end before St. Nick has a chance to deliver the gifts to those poor Mayan children. Well, we can do something about this now, but we need your help. Please send your non-deductible ( cash only) donations to: Santa is too coming to town, you sumbitch! c/o trog69 @ P.O. box 14546, Green Valley, AZ. 90210.
Please, give 'til it hurts when you laugh.
Wrote trog69:
Hello, my name is trog. I've been an asshole for 50+years now...aw screw this, I ain't gonna sit here and listen to a buncha whining, not while I'm sober! ( Just funnin'; If AA helps ya, good on it.)
Now here's some real funny stuff, though not in any belly laugh way. I like to see what WND, Newsmax, RedState, Human Events, and other very rightwing sites are up to, and I'm aware that at least one of them will show their ass daily. Today is Newsmax' turn, though it really is the first one I've opened, so the night is young. Here's the very first paragraph from their email update newsletter:
Breaking from Newsmax.com
Conyers: Obama Must 'Knock Heads' on Healthcare
WASHINGTON -- The most senior African-American in Congress offered some unsolicited advice Monday to President Barack Obama on how to get his signature health care bill through a balky Senate: knock their heads together. ( Obviously, my bold)
Yes, because if there's one important fact that needs telling...
Wrote Dark Wraith:
"The most senior Homo sapiens sapiens on the Senate Human Beings Subcommittee is recommending that Barack Obama utilize higher cognitive abilities when contemplating strategies to get the country out of the wide-ranging messes his predecessor, a Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, got us into.
"Reports from insiders at the White House indicate that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel responded with favorable grunts and chest-beating to the idea.
"Former Vice President Dick Cheney, vacationing at the American Lower Primates Reserve, sometimes called the Council on Foreign Relations, ran up a tree and made monkey sounds while pulling his ears."
.
The Dark Wraith ought to write scripts for FOX News.
Wrote Father Tyme:
Damn! And I missed Animal Planet because someone let the (blue) dogs out!
Wrote Moody Blue:
Why does it seem like I always get the only seat on this roller coaster that doesn't have a safety bar?!
AP(E news) also reported that Conyer's "knock heads" story at MSNBC --
along with a skinny mini guide comparing the House and Senate health care bills.
Wrote trog69:
Here, you can hang onto me, Moody Bl...aaaaaaaa not there!-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaholyjeezleggo!!aaaaaaaaaaaaaa...
"Well, I was a little nervous, but troggy, he screamed like a little girl!"
Wrote trog69:
Oh, 'n don't ya worry none 'bout the cost. Them there O-ree-entals will kindly lend us all the bucks we need!
Hell, we might jest decide that payin' them Chinamans ain't in the cards right now. If they don't like it, we'll bomb their asses agin, like we did in '45! (Teh Greatest Generation since the Enlightenment, which done screwed them commie Europeans outta the abject fear o' God that our freedom allows us to enjoy here in USA!1)
Wrote Father Tyme:
Uh, trog? You mixin' your meds with take-out MSG again?
Wrote trog69:
Hahahah, damn, I never heard of that combo before.
Moo goo gai pills!
Wrote Dark Wraith:
The parking lot is filling up with zombies driving late-model Chryslers and Chevys.
I suppose I should lock the doors.
Zombies are lousy tippers.
The Dark Wraith turns on the NO VACANCY sign.
Wrote Moody Blue:
So sorry, Trog. I was trying to change gears, and I thought that was the shift lever. (It's been a while since I drove a stick.)
Please draw the curtains and turn the lights low, Wraith. We don't want the zombies to see inside the diner.
Wrote trog69:
You guys can worry 'bout them zombos; Not me, boy. hehehehe.
I ain't got nuttin' dey want.
Add Comments
Log in
Become a Registered Commenter
« Return to the main page.
This blog offers Internet travelers a place where they can discuss economics, finance, politics, and other topics of scholarly and practical interest to thinking people. Your comments are always welcome, and your visits are most appreciated.
Your host of this Weblog is an award-winning college teacher and writer who specializes in economics, finance, mathematics, business administration, computer hardware and software skills, and English grammar and composition. His extensive writings on the history of the English language appeared on About.com in the avatar of the Selig Wraith in the 
Send a Secure Message to the Dark Wraith
![[Valid RSS]](http://dark-wraith.com/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
Good evening, Dark Wraith.
I'm enjoying your roll. Keep 'em rolling... especially the "dancing, naked clowns of the Right." That one made my day.
I'm also not exactly excited about the current House version of the health care bill, as you can tell by the last line of my post this morning:
The health care bill now goes back to the Senate. We'll see how they grind it up before voting. We appear to be moving forward... with something..
And I choose those words very carefully. :lol: