Monday, August 21, 2006

Special Blog Post:
Upon Returning

An apology is in order. Late last week, your host here at The Dark Wraith Forums vanished without so much as a fond farewell.

I have returned now. Several projects waylayed me. The death last week of one of my remaining three brothers demanded that I travel to another state and deliver a eulogy along with expressed regret to his wife and 13-year-old son. I was about the same age when my father passed from this Earth on a late Sunday afternoon in April many years ago. My brother, like our father before us, did not care to live life using a quiet voice: his was an angry youth and a long road to good wisdom and fair peace with himself and his world. In his small way, he made that world better by rattling its common people from time to time and by offering it the grace of his remarkable intelligence all the time. It was years before I knew much at all about the remarkable life my father had lived, and I wanted to ensure that my brother's boy knew something about his father in those years when he stood tall, acted fiercely, and reached way beyond himself only to fail over and over again just so he could only once in a great while succeed.

On that late Sunday afternoon so many years ago, as my father lay in his final moments, all of his relatives stood around him. He asked that he be turned to the window so he could see the mighty pine tree that towered beside it. For me, it was time to leave that terribly crowded room: what would surely soon be one of those awful, gaping holes I felt upon someone's death would not be outside, especially if I sat near that tree where no one could see me. The town bell tolled 6:00 p.m., and the Dutchman's mortal life ended. It was not too long before I heard my mother walking by. She didn't see me; she had to go to the clearing where she could see the sun that was, as always, surrendering its fight to keep the day lit. There, she could stand for a while in the silence of the Sunday afternoon. With a cracking, quiet voice, she said his name to the sunset, and then she turned and went back into the house to join the grim ceremony of grief.

I still think about that mighty pine tree. It fell that Summer, destroyed by a lightning strike and cut down shortly thereafter. Once fallen, it was no longer—as it had been for as long as I could remember—foreshortened against the sky above. Instead, as it lay on the ground, I could see its entire length, its life from beginning to end. Scars and flaws were everywhere, but the tree was no less magnificent for them. It was so young and frail near the top: the lightning was able to wreck it unmercifully there; but at its base, it was massive, powerful, and full of such strength.

And as much as it had nurtured life and given comfort to the living and the dying in the years that it had stood, the tree offered its most as it lay in state, where it could patiently await the wind, the rain, and the fires to scatter it to the earth and sky and thereby send its legacy onward.



The Dark Wraith will resume posting tomorrow.

<< 35 Comments Total
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.

Please allow me to express my sympathies for your loss. It seems that this has been a trying time for many (four of my co-workers have had to be out for funerals in the last two weeks).

That you spent time with your nephew, to talk about his father, was a thoughtful thing to do. He will appreciate the time you took, once the pain has started to recede.

Tue Aug 22, 01:06:20 AM EDT  
 Debra blogged...

Eloquently written. May I also express my sympathy for you and your family's loss.

May the sun rise to greet you in the morning.

Tue Aug 22, 01:29:08 AM EDT  
 Moody Blue blogged...

My sincere condolences, Wraith.

Heart To Heart

When we come to the place of full retreat
And our heart cries out for God,
The only person whose heart ours can meet
Is the one who has likewise trod.

Others may offer a word of cheer
To lift us from despair;
But above the rest, the one we hear
Is the whisper, "I've been there."
--C. R. Solomon

"The love they leave behind is the stuff memories are made of."

Tue Aug 22, 05:30:43 AM EDT  
 Moody Blue blogged...

My sincere condolences, Wraith.

Heart To Heart

When we come to the place of full retreat
And our heart cries out for God,
The only person whose heart ours can meet
Is the one who has likewise trod.

Others may offer a word of cheer
To lift us from despair;
But above the rest, the one we hear
Is the whisper, "I've been there."
--C. R. Solomon

"The love they leave behind is the stuff memories are made of."

Tue Aug 22, 05:30:44 AM EDT  
 Chuck blogged...

I want to say sincere condolences to you and your family Dark Wraith.

To me, the death of a family member or close friend is the most difficult experience of life. We mourn for ourselves and our remaining family- although sometimes we don't see it that way. I wish for strength against the pain for you and yours.

Tue Aug 22, 05:54:29 AM EDT  
 Mr. Shakes blogged...

Good morning, Dark Wraith.

Shakes and I would like to express our consolences for you and your family's loss.

Take care, mon ami.

Tue Aug 22, 07:30:04 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Good morning, Dark Wraith.

Sincere condolences to you and yours.

namaste

Dr. Bong

Tue Aug 22, 10:18:53 AM EDT  
 nightshift66 blogged...

DW,
I am also saddened by your loss and offer my sincere condolences.

Tue Aug 22, 11:26:55 AM EDT  
 blackdog blogged...

Sorry for your loss, my condolences to you and yours. He must have been something. I often say that my brother is me times 10, I couldn't imagine his death. My thoughts are with you, Dark One.

Tue Aug 22, 11:30:04 AM EDT  
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good morning Dark Wraith:

My sincere condolences to you and your family. This is the song Geronimo is said to have sung while in prison in Florida when he heard of the death of Taza.

O, ha le
O, ha le!
Awbizhaye
Shichl hadahiyago
nini-ya nini-ya nini-ya
O, ha le
O, ha le
Tsago degi naleya
Ah--yu whi ye!
O, ha le
O, ha le!


O, ha le
O, ha le!
Through the air
I fly upon the air
Towards the sky, far, far, far,
O, ha le
O, ha le!
There to find the holy place,
Ah, now the change comes o're me!
O, ha le
O, ha le!

Among my mother's people there is always a bit of cognitive dissonance regarding death. Yes, we are saddened and very aware of our loss, and yet, it can be hard to give in totally to grief when a Warrior finally goes home.

Again, my best wishes to your family, prayers will be said in the old way under the next new moon.

Tue Aug 22, 12:06:58 PM EDT  
 Eric A Hopp blogged...

Dark Wraith:

My condolences for your loss.

Tue Aug 22, 12:57:25 PM EDT  
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

"Than Almitra spoke, saying, "We would ask now of Death."
And he said:
You would know the secret of death.
But how shall you find it unless you seek it in the heart of life?
The owl whose night-bound eyes are blind unto the day cannot unveil the mystery of light.
If you would indeed behold the spirit of death, open your heart wide unto the body of life.
For life and death are one, even as the river and the sea are one.
In the depth of your hopes and desires lies your silent knowledge of the beyond;
And like seeds dreaming beneath the snow your heart dreams of spring.
Trust the dreams, for in them is hidden the gate to eternity.
Your fear of death is but the trembling of the shepherd when he stands before the king whose hand is to be laid upon him in honour.
Is the shepherd not joyful beneath his trembling, that he shall wear the mark of the king?
Yet is he not more mindful of his trembling?
For what is it to die but to stand naked in the wind and to melt into the sun?
And what is to cease breathing, but to free the breath from its restless tides, that it may rise and expand and seek God unencumbered?
Only when you drink from the river of silence shall you indeed sing.
And when you have reached the mountain top, then you shall begin to climb.
And when the earth shall claim your limbs, then shall you truly dance."


Kahlil Gibran, The Prophet: On Death

Tue Aug 22, 08:34:09 PM EDT  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

My sympathy goes out to those affected by the loss. Death can be difficult, but here's to the memories, which in the end they are all we have of others. It sounds like you have yours. Peace, and may memory lane be a path through the rose garden.

Tue Aug 22, 09:59:19 PM EDT  
 Fred Bieling blogged...

Sorry to hear the news.

Wed Aug 23, 02:21:58 AM EDT  
 Progressive Traditionalist blogged...

Good morning, Mr Wraith.

My deep and sincere condolences to you.

Wed Aug 23, 06:15:57 AM EDT  
 The Fat Lady Sings blogged...

Again - my sincere condolences on the death of your brother. It seems this trip took even more out of you than initially anticipated. I'm so sorry, my dear. I wish I could offer up more than just words. Part of my Irish tradition involves ‘doing’ for the bereaved - bringing food, seeing to all the everyday mundane tasks - allowing the person to grieve without worrying over responsibilities. I hope you are with friends who can help you through this difficult time. I also wanted to say that staying on to spend time with your nephew was a really wonderful thing to do. I'm sure it's one of those memories he will treasure whenever he thinks of his dad – and he’ll have you to thank for it.

Please take care of yourself.

Wed Aug 23, 01:23:43 PM EDT  
 creature blogged...

My condolences as well.

Wed Aug 23, 11:00:01 PM EDT  
 Phoenician in a time of Romans blogged...

I'm sorry to hear of your loss. The ravages of time on relatives and loved ones is a constant theme in my life as well, of late.

I'm not able to pull poetry out to express sorrow, but I think the Xhosa chant backing Pete Gabriel's Biko expresses mourning well enough:

"Yihla Moja, Yihla Moja
The man is dead, the man is dead."

Wed Aug 23, 11:28:43 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Only in silence the word,
Only in darkness the light,
Only in dying life:
Bright the hawk's flight on the empty sky.
- Ursula LeGuin

- oddjob

Thu Aug 24, 03:32:08 PM EDT  
 Dad the Realist blogged...

Condolences Dark One.

When loved ones pass from the physical domain, the resulting hole(s) can never be filled.

What you did for your nephew will leave an impression on him for the rest of his life.

He just might tell of your exploits
when time comes for you to enter Valhalla.

Thu Aug 24, 03:48:05 PM EDT  
 StealthBadger blogged...

Please be well, sir.

Thu Aug 24, 09:38:30 PM EDT  
 BlondeSense Liz blogged...

I'm so sorry, Dark One.

May peace be with you and your family.

Liz

Thu Aug 24, 10:13:21 PM EDT  
 Michael Emmanuel blogged...

Dear DW,

My thoughts are with you this day. I was wondering what had happened as you seemed to have vanished. I hope your time with family was healing and life-renewing even in this time of physical loss.

I was pleased to see PoLT post of the Prophet, by Kahlil Gibran. Those very words poured over my heart and soul earlier this year as I prepared to attend my mother's funeral. I shall not forget your kind thoughts at that time.

All kindness and good wishes to you and yours in EE...

Only when you drink from the river of silence shall you indeed sing.
And when you have reached the mountain top, then you shall begin to climb.
And when the earth shall claim your limbs, then shall you truly dance."

Sat Aug 26, 03:02:05 AM EDT  
 kablooie blogged...

Your nephew is very lucky to have you for his uncle.

Sat Aug 26, 05:05:20 PM EDT  
 konagod blogged...

Good afternoon, Dark Wraith,

That was a very moving post. I am so sorry to hear of your loss.

Sat Aug 26, 05:32:43 PM EDT  
 elf blogged...

DW,
Peace upon you and your family.
Sincerly,
elf

Sun Aug 27, 09:19:57 PM EDT  
 karen m blogged...

Good morning, Dark Wraith.

I'm sorry for your loss. You've written an eloquent tribute to your brother. May your heart, and his family's hearts, heal quickly.

Mon Aug 28, 10:14:23 AM EDT  
 roger blogged...

(.)


you are indeed a good brother and uncle. a mensch.

Mon Aug 28, 10:21:43 AM EDT  
 blackdog blogged...

It's time, Dark Wraith, come back, we need you.

Mon Aug 28, 02:56:40 PM EDT  
 Dark_Muz blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith-
Once again, I appologize for the leave of absnece. I have moved back to college. It was very unfortante to hear about your loss. You have done justice to both your father and brother in this entry. I pray with your guidance, your nephew with become as strong and firey as the males in the generations before him. I am sure many are grateful for your time and words.
I do hope to read more soon. There are (as always) many issues to dicuss!
I shall now return to studying....

Tue Aug 29, 12:38:04 AM EDT  
 Imoral Majority blogged...

I'm very sorry for your loss.

Tue Aug 29, 11:38:29 AM EDT  
 SB Gypsy blogged...

Dearest Wraith,

Please accept my sincerest condolences at this late date.

Words cannot express, although your eloquence goes far...

Tue Aug 29, 12:24:14 PM EDT  
 Elizabeth Branford blogged...

I am sorry, Dark Wraith.

Tue Aug 29, 10:01:53 PM EDT  
 Gary blogged...

Good Afternoon Dark Wraith,

I am sorry to hear of your loss. He sounds like a great man...And it seems through your words, that the proverbial apple didn't fall far from the tree.

Condolences.

g

Wed Aug 30, 02:40:32 PM EDT  
 Jersey Cynic blogged...

Gosh DW, I'm so sorry to learn of your loss. I wish I could be there to take care of you -- you take such good care of all of us. Hang in there, and treasure all of those memories -- you must have so many of them - I am sure that you are overwhelmed. In time, you'll be able to call up all of those memories, one by one, whenever you need them.

Thu Aug 31, 10:54:44 AM EDT  

       

Friday, August 11, 2006

Special Graphic Post:
The Movie of the Year




The Dark Wraith herewith grants permission to republish this graphic at full or reduced scale.

<< 26 Comments Total
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good afternoon Dark Wraith:

I used to have a favorite t-shirt that was retired in tatters, it was dedicated to Bush peŕe and was titled "Son Of Reaganstein"
my favorite little section billed "With Dick Nixon as 'Hap'" I give Joe L. a week and half to two weeks before he comes out of the shock of losing something he thought was his birthright and runs out of money. Reality will come down around his head and he'll start thinking about that cruise to florida or a lame duck cabinet appointment from the bushies.

Airports today suck out loud. Thank god for laptops and hot spots.

Fri Aug 11, 03:50:14 PM EDT  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

Snort. The credits are especially good.

Fri Aug 11, 05:26:07 PM EDT  
 konagod blogged...

Evening to you dark sir.

Yeah! Damned good.

Fri Aug 11, 07:41:14 PM EDT  
 Moody Blue blogged...

Excellent graphic, Wraith! Too funny.
I love your new entry to the Dark Wraith Dictionary: neoconnie. Great definition, and spot on!

Fri Aug 11, 10:05:07 PM EDT  
 elf blogged...

Ahh DW,

"Put the candle back."

LOL gotta love it.

Fri Aug 11, 10:08:57 PM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.

The Republican Party as The Brain.

Heh! That was my favorite part:)

Sat Aug 12, 12:48:01 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Thank you, good friends, for the kind words on the graphic, which is obviously rather unkind to Joe.


The Dark Wraith hopes Joe gets to see it.
[Actually, the Dark Wraith hopes Ned gets to see it.]

Sat Aug 12, 01:00:41 AM EDT  
 BlondeSense Liz blogged...

That is a fabulous graphic, oh Dark One of my dreams. Do send it to Lamont's campaign and Lieberman's too. WTH.

When I was losing my mind at JFK yesterday morning, I frequently reiterated to anyone near me, that they are being inconvenienced simply because Lieberman lost the primary in Connecticut and to please direct their rage to him personally and of course Dick Cheney. :)

Sat Aug 12, 12:53:27 PM EDT  
 SB Gypsy blogged...

Good Afternoon Dark One,

Kudos for the poster, the man is such a gut-wrenching whiner. I'm hoping against hope that he will drop out, but I fear that he will drag on to the end. He's counting on the CT republicans to put him in office this time.

Last night when I got home, the news must have had three of his commercials in the 15 minutes that I watched. Hubby thinks that everyone around here is tired of the election, and just wants a break for vacation and such. He doesn't think old RapeGurneyJoe is too smart to be flooding the media with his smarmy face and whining voice right now.

Though, even with several thousand republicans re-registering to game our primary, he couldn't win it.
(is there any way to find out how many of those who re-registered were indys, and how many were repubs? [and why the heck isn't that illegal?])

I just can't wait till he gets his pink slip.

Sat Aug 12, 04:02:48 PM EDT  
 PoliShifter blogged...

The power of Sean Hannity may be able to kill Lieberstein.

Hannity is now recommending to his flock that they DON'T vote for Lieberstein.

So much for their great friendship...

Poor Joe, stupid enough to trust Republican Wingnuts and embrace them as "friends".

Now they are going to push him out like a bowel movement in a bloated buffalo.

I guess Republicans feel branding Lamont as "The Al Qaeda Candidate" will be enough to get the Republican Candidate a victory. They don't need Joe anymore..

Sat Aug 12, 04:08:41 PM EDT  
 SB Gypsy blogged...

Nah, the republican candidate is severely flawed, won't quit, and only has 5% support. That may change....

Now, where is this Dark Wraith Dictionary???

Sat Aug 12, 04:20:28 PM EDT  
 nc gal blogged...

Beautiful.

Love the credits.

Sun Aug 13, 12:32:24 AM EDT  
 Don blogged...

Beautiful, simply beautiful! "Rove as Igor" just killed me. The only thing missing is "Bush as the Bride of..."

[Actually, the Dark Wraith hopes Ned gets to see it.]

Could happen.

Sun Aug 13, 06:12:04 AM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Good afternoon, Dark Wraith.

After reading your quote:
Quoth the Dark Wraith
PT Barnum Revised:

There's a story about terrorism born every minute...

and two Bush Administration officials to take advantage of it.


I find myself nodding my head in agreement!

Sun Aug 13, 02:45:02 PM EDT  
 Michael Emmanuel blogged...

Dear Dark Wraith,
I've added you graphic to my already hypergraphic/video/auralishes award winning blog (I award myself)with an audio of Gene Wilder exclaiming: Alive.. It's ALive... it's alive! and of course, a link back to you and thanks for the logo image, helps the sidebar sparkle!!!

Best wishes for a wildly successful movie career. Hope you'll always consider doing a cameo role.

meEE dba Michael Emmanuel

Sun Aug 13, 03:19:39 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon.

While I am working on several projects, one of which is a Pulp Economics article, I thought I would pass along the link to an article at the People's Daily Online, which serves as a semi-official organ of the Chinese Communist Party. The title of the article is "Merciless reality and remnant falsehood." If you've never read the English version of People's Daily, you might be surprised by how well the articles are written in English (generally better than those in many foreign publications with English translations). The tone of the article is surprisingly measured, as well; but be forewarned that this isn't merely some writer's opinion: it is a signal of position by a very large country that is sitting as a very interested observer in the wings of the U.S. fiasco in Iraq.

You might notice that, even though the very first paragraph of the editorial addresses the Lieberman/Lamont contest, the article assiduously (in fact, almost masterfully) avoids any hint of approval of Ned Lamont.

But there's no doubt at all that the contest is being watched not just by interested observers here in the United States, but also in other places, too.


The Dark Wraith thinks this election season is going to be fun.

Mon Aug 14, 01:25:38 PM EDT  
 Eric A Hopp blogged...

Nice Poster--can't wait for the special edition DVD to come out in November.

What else can we all say about Holy Joe Lieberman--the guy's a sore loser! He first ran on a pro-Iraq war platform at a time when the American public has been consistently souring on the war in Iraq. All he had to do was look at the poll numbers to realize that supporting the Iraq war was bad news and perhaps Holy Joe needed to distance himself away from his original opinions. Holy Joe's second big problem was that he had gotten too cozy with President Bush--not just on the war in Iraq, but also the Great War on Terror, or even NSA domestic spying--Lieberman was either supporting the Bush administration's view, or he was trying to hold off the mounting Democratic Party's anger against President Bush and the Republicans. Either way, he tried to stake a position out that was right of center (is there really a political center now?) in a political landscape that is become increasingly polarized. Ned Lamont saw a chance, ran against Lieberman, and beat Lieberman's pants off.

Now Lieberman is calling foul against the Democratic constituents who booted him out of office this November, while at the same time trying to run as both an independent and anti-establishment candidate! You have got to marvel at Lieberman's hypocrisy and his self-centerness. He believes himself to be the true savior of the Democratic Party--a party that has been captured by anti-war extremists. The problem is that Lieberman is so ignorant at how both the American public has turned against the Iraq war, and at how he will be used by the Republicans to not just split the Democratic vote, but also to hopefully allow Republican candidate Alan Schlesinger to squeak by with a win in Connecticut.

Wed Aug 16, 11:19:19 PM EDT  
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good Morning Dark Wraith:

Excellent Quoth The Dark Wraith this morning. I was instantly suspicious of the confession merely because it was produced in custody in Thailand. Corporal punishment, for infractions, real and imagined, is not unusual there, with beating the soles of the feet being among the favorites for obtaining swift total confessions from people who don't speak thai. Also, it's clearly obvious that this guy is totally disturbed, probably heavily medicated also.

Fri Aug 18, 01:29:24 PM EDT  
 SB Gypsy blogged...

Good afternoon Dark Wraith,

Eric - you have LIEberman down to a tee - but what is it about the republican candidate's 8% that people don't understand? What with the gambling problems that he was sued for, and the gambling under aliases at the casinos, the man's toast! It's betwen Lamont and Lieberman now, and who knows what'll happen -

Fri Aug 18, 04:58:52 PM EDT  
 Eric A Hopp blogged...

SB Gypsy: I don't know what it is about Schlesinger's 8 percent support that keeps him into the race--especially considering the reports on his gambling debts. Maybe the 8 percent of Connecticut's population is so brain-dead that they are willing to support Schlesinger.

Watching the dynamics of the Connecticut race play out, it appears that the Republicans are abandoning Schlesinger in support for Lieberman. In other words, Lieberman has become the unofficial "Republican" candidate for the Connecticut Senate race. That is the reason why President Bush, Tony Snow, and even Ken Mehlman have refused to publicly endorse the Republican Party's own candidate Schlesinger, while at the same time attacking the Democrats for choosing Lamont over Lieberman. I would say that the Republicans know that Schlesinger doesn't have a snowball's chance in winning, so they are flocking over to Lieberman. If Lieberman gets elected, they at least get their pro-Iraq war Bush lite senator, over that of an anti-Iraq war candidate Lamont. The Republicans are trying to play the lesser of two evils here--in this case keeping conservative pro-Bush independent Lieberman in office, over that of anti-Bush Lamont.

The more I think about this, the more it makes sense as to why Lieberman chose to run as an independent after Lamont beat him in the Democratic primary. Lieberman may have either realized, or was seduced into believing, that there was enough Republican and conservative support to make his independent run. I wouldn't be surprised if Karl Rove himself enticed Lieberman to continue running after the election. Did the Republican Party try to subvert the Democratic Party's primary process by convincing Joe Lieberman to continue running as an independent--either before or after the Connecticut primary? This whole mess is just playing right into the Republican Party's dirty hands and their desire to win at all costs.

Fri Aug 18, 05:49:42 PM EDT  
 Don blogged...

This whole mess is just playing right into the Republican Party's dirty hands and their desire to win at all costs.

That reminds me of something Palast wrote a while back in one of his columns. On being asked what the point of voting is if the GOP (through caging, roll scrubbing, IDs, hinky election regulations, corrupt officials, propped-up third parties, suspect voting machines, and God knows what else) is going to steal the election, his reply:

That’s the point: Make them STEAL it. Make them know they can’t win UNLESS they steal it.

Sat Aug 19, 06:34:37 AM EDT  
 Eric A Hopp blogged...

The problem with the Republican strategy of winning at all costs is how much more wins can you steal before the opposition starts to gang up on you? How much more power can you accumulate before those who you have oppressed will turn against you? How much more goodies can you give to your benefactors before those who have nothing left to lose will pick up their own weapons to destroy you--and they will destroy you because they have nothing to lose, while you have everything to lose?

Power corrupts. The more power you have, the more power you lust for. That is the corrupting influence of power. Over time, the corrupting influence of power will destroy you, your ideology, your political party, your nation. You cannot maintain complete, absolute power forever, for power has a tendency to diffuse either through internal corruption, or external threats.

The Republican Party of today has certainly been weakened by its own internal corruption, its desire to win at all costs and accumulate more power, and its desire to give all benefits to its corporate, and rich elites. It has so far maintained that power through its "southern strategy" of enticing White Anglo-Saxon Protestant voters with racism and fear (the Evangelical Christians are the latest group to be courted). It is a strategy the Republicans cannot use forever--not when the WASPs are becoming a minority group. The Republicans can only use election fraud and Diebold machines for so long before the results become so skewered that the Hispanic and African-American communities will realize that they have been screwed by the Republican Party. The Republicans can only give so much of the U.S. Treasury to their corporate and rich elites, before the rest of us--who have nothing left--will form our own revolt against the elites.

It is just a matter of time.

Sun Aug 20, 03:47:54 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

The more I think about this, the more it makes sense as to why Lieberman chose to run as an independent after Lamont beat him in the Democratic primary. Lieberman may have either realized, or was seduced into believing, that there was enough Republican and conservative support to make his independent run.

Well sure. That was plain from the polling. It's been stated for some time (months before the primary election) that in a three way race Lieberman won with 56% of the sample (Lamont being second and well behind Lieberman and What's-His-Name WAY behind the other two). Given that and the way things were trending among the CT Dems., of course Lieberman opted to circulate the petitions necessary to get him on the ballot as an independent (at least, "of course" if his goal was to be senator, Democrat or not). For myself, I don't see a reason to involved Rove as a seducer in this one. I don't doubt he's involved himself in the CT Repubs. and how they're handling this, but that's a separate matter.

- oddjob (who will be returning to regular commenting in about one week's time)

Sun Aug 20, 11:05:26 PM EDT  
 Don blogged...

What will be interesting to see with Lieberman is, if he wins in Nov with a majority of the vote (incl GOP), but Lamont's got a majority of the Dem vote, will he still be allowed to sit with the Dem caucus?

(I'll pass on the question of whether he'd try to, as he's proven he's got the sheer gall to try)

Mon Aug 21, 06:36:25 AM EDT  
 SB Gypsy blogged...

Good Morning Dark Wraith,

And, hey Oddjob, welcome back, you were missed!

Did the Republican Party try to subvert the Democratic Party's primary process by convincing Joe Lieberman to continue running as an independent--either before or after the Connecticut primary?

What I'd like to know is just WHO decided to schedule the Dem primary BEFORE the cutoff date to submit petitions to run independent??????

This is the FIRST TIME the CT Dem primary was before the cut off date. Did the CT Dems do it expressly to let LIEberman have a do over? WTF, couldn't they see that one coming a mile away?

I would dearly love to see the national Democratic Party strip that looser of all his Dem committees and seniority.

Mon Aug 21, 11:12:50 AM EDT  
 Phillybits blogged...

That's excellent! I see a cross-post in the future!

Wed Aug 30, 10:42:00 PM EDT  

       

Thursday, August 10, 2006

The Written Peace:
Open Forum of August 11, 2006

While your host is striving to put some logical flow into a new installment of Pulp Economics here at The Dark Wraith Forums, let us take some time to have an open thread, which seems sorely needed considering the wide-ranging topical content of the last several threads. For those of you needing a recap, we went all the way from nuclear annihilation and "twilight scenarios" to the differences between analytic and synthetic languages. Along the way, we discussed the economics concept of price elasticity of demand, which will be the subject of the aforementioned next article here. Somehow, we also got into a brief discussion about alien civilizations and hegemony beyond the Earth. Adding further to the diversity of matters under consideration, I was compelled to create a nice new graphic for the ladies at BlondeSense, although I have become a little concerned about the prospect that one of those folks will actually post that thing, thereby making me look like some kind of very troubled missile afficionado. Oh, yes: we also touched upon how the Norman French introduced us to distinguishing between an animal and the meat of that animal: so, for example, we need not be so crude as to eat "cow" (as the Anglo-Saxons would have), but instead we eat "beef" (as proper, civilized people should); and we need never dine on the lowly, swine-oriented "pig," but instead we chew its flesh, which we call "pork."

I am now thoroughly convinced that this place is the intellectual, cyberspace equivalent of the bar in the old television series Cheers.

Moving along, I want to welcome some good people. Dad the Realist has shown up on occasion, and his input is thoroughly worthy of this place, as is the recent commentary by Dianna of Swatch It, Imoral Majority of the blog Immoral Majority, and Don. I honestly cannot remember whether or not I had ever before formally welcomed Mark of the blog called GASH, but I shall risk redundancy by doing so here, as I shall for Minstrel Boy of Harp and Sword. And always, I thank those who have been here since forever, both the active commenters and those who quietly pass through on a regular basis.

A few minor matters are on the agenda. First, I have added some new computer desktop wallpapers to the selection offered in the sidebar section, Dark Wraith Themes. All of the wallpapers are from posts here at The Dark Wraith Forums, although you'll be seeing them at full color and size, especially if you choose a 1600×1200 version. In several cases, the graphics are slightly different from what you would have seen posted in an article or as a link from an article: post-publication enhancements—final touches and subtle additions, mainly—are not particularly obvious except maybe in the graphic "Dark Century." Eventually, those graphics and several others will be offered as posters, but that's down the road a little ways.

Within the next few days, a Special Blog Post might be published here to make an announcement of relatively minor importance for the time being, but perhaps of somewhat greater importance later on.

Finally, as far as exciting and boring blog notices are concerned, the advertisements that have become rather fossilized mainstays down in the sidebar will begin to vanish over the next couple of weeks. Although I had been planning to do that, a number of the advertisers have been kind enough to get me motivated to drop them sooner than I had planned. Up until recently the overriding issue that had been bothering me was that the advertisers get free company and product exposure here for nothing more than offering me the faint hope of commissions. Now, it's gotten serious: most of the advertisers are forcing their "affiliates" to go to javascript snippets rather than linked graphics. Aside from the fact that javascripts on a site slow down the load time—and I do enough javascripts of my own here to slow the load time down to a glacial crawl, thank you very much—the major problem is that I lose control not just of content the advertisers want to push through, but I also lose control of exactly what those advertisers are doing to site visitors and those who click through on the ads. Up until now, I could simply cut out things like "Web bugs" and other controversial code from the ads I posted; but with javascripts that are being called from the advertisers' servers, I can't do that. That means retaining or dropping many of the advertisers has moved from a simple business decision to a risk management exercise. Risk managers make really good salaries; so, since the advertisers refuse to pay attractive flat fees, I must turn the matter back into a simple business decision, and the decision on that basis is quite easy to make.

All is not lost, though. In a couple of weeks, I shall offer ad space for classified advertisements, here. That's right: you can sell stuff right here at The Dark Wraith Forums. Tasteful stuff, mind you. I shall not countenance any ads for people selling their organs or the entire bodies, for example. Neither will I suffer ads for "services" of an altogether tawdry, prurient, or otherwise unappetizing type. Sheesh: I shouldn't have to even point that out; but somehow, I know I'll regret it if I don't.

Enough of that.

Earlier today, I slipped back over to one of my ancient haunts, the Medieval History Forum at About.com, so I could find the massive thread—now long dead—I created there. It was called "A Once and Future Language," and it was a behemoth, the longest one ever sustained in that forum if I'm not mistaken. I was looking for a particular post I published, but going through all 600+ comments of my thread left me empty-handed. Then I realized that I must have put the post in question on another thread there. As I started expanding my search, I realized that I had published comments on probably several dozen threads in the forum. I finally found the post, and I thought I'd share it with you. The background of it has to do with a running discussion that was going on about an ancient poem/song called "Green Grow the Rushes—O," upon which I commented at length and in great detail. However, in the interest of offering spice to what some might have considered a rather boring track the discussion was taking, I decided to offer some versions of a poem by the same name written by Robert Burns in the 18th Century. What makes the Burns poem fascinating is that there are two versions, one most definitely by Burns and the other quite possibly by him. Below, I republish the post in its entirety, which I was addressing to the forum member who called herself Lady Hawke.

Good evening, Lady Hawke.

Well, I suppose I opened the door by mentioning something naughty and almost on-topic that I might post. The subject of this thread is a song entitled Green Grow the Rushes—O, which is almost the same as a poem/song attributed to the 18th Century poet, Robert Burns. His poem is entitled Green Grow the Rashes—O or Green Grow the Rushes—O, but it is considerably different from the subject of this thread. What makes this poem interesting (and perhaps a little closer to being on topic) is that two very different versions of this poem exist: the published version and an earlier, draft version represented by a friend of Burns as a draft that Burns sent him. The draft version quickly passed into folk tradition, and variations on it have been made and sung ever since, although this version cannot be directly attributed to Burns other than on the word of this supposed friend.

Before we proceed, I must warn you all that the draft version is just about as obscene as literature can get in any era. If pornographic trash is offensive to you, you might want to skip the second version. Even if you do read it, you might want to consider bathing afterward.

I shall post these two versions; then I shall return in a while with some scholarly commentary on the vulgarity of it all. I figure that this chain of posts will not only kill this thread, it might even cause it to burst into red flames and disappear into oblivion.

Without further ado, we first have the published, nice version.

Green grow the rashes, O;
Green grow the rashes, O;
The sweetest hours that e'er I spend,
Are spent amang the lasses, O.

There's nought but care on ev'ry han',
In ev'ry hour that passes, O:
What signifies the life o' man,
An' 'twere na for the lasses, O
Green grow the rashes, O;
Green grow the rashes, O;
The sweetest hours that e'er I spend,
Are spent amang the lasses, O.

The warly race may riches chase,
An' riches still may fly them, O;
An' tho' at last they catch them fast,
Their hearts can ne'er enjoy them, O.
Green grow the rashes, O;
Green grow the rashes, O;
The sweetest hours that e'er I spend,
Are spent amang the lasses, O.

But gie me a canny hour at e'en,
My arms about my Dearie, O;
An' warly cares, an' warly men,
May a' gae tapsalteerie, O!
Green grow the rashes, O;
Green grow the rashes, O;
The sweetest hours that e'er I spend,
Are spent amang the lasses, O.

For you sae douse, ye sneer at this,
Ye're nought but senseless asses, O:
The wisest Man the warl' saw,
He dearly lov'd the lasses, O.
Green grow the rashes, O;
Green grow the rashes, O;
The sweetest hours that e'er I spend,
Are spent amang the lasses, O.

Auld Nature swears, the lovely Dears
Her nob!est work she classes, O:
Her prentice han' she try'd on man,
An' then she made the lasses, O.
Green grow the rashes, O;
Green grow the rashes, O;
The sweetest hours that e'er I spend,
Are spent amang the lasses, O.



Nice, isn't it? Now, let us have a look at the draft version. (Note that this is your last warning that you might want to turn back.)

O wat ye ought o' fisher Meg,
And how she trow'd the webster, O,
She loot me see her carrot cunt,
And sell'd it for a labster, O.
Green graw the rashes, O,
Green grow the rashes, O,
The lassies they hae wimble-bores,
The widows they hae gashes, O.

Mistress Mary cow'd her thing,
Because she wad be gentle, O,
And span the fleece upon a rock,
To waft a Highland mantle, O.
Green graw the rashes, O,
Green grow the rashes, O,
The lassies they hae wimble-bores,
The widows they hae gashes, O.

An' heard ye o' the coat o' arms
The Lyon brought our lady, O,
The crest was; couchant; sable cunt.
The motto - "ready, ready," O.
Green graw the rashes, O,
Green grow the rashes, O,
The lassies they hae wimble-bores,
The widows they hae gashes, O.

An' ken ye Leezie Lundie, O.
The godly Leezie Lundie, O,
She mounts like reek thro' a' the week,
But finger fucks on Sunday, O.
Green graw the rashes, O,
Green grow the rashes, O,
The lassies they hae wimble-bores,
The widows they hae gashes, O.

That got something of a rouse out of the crowd. For me, the poetry of that by-gone era illustrates just how far our society—nay, our very civilization—has declined from that glad time of the 18th Century when we were far more godly and when our the inspirational leaders of society were veritable beacons of piety of heart and purity of thought.

The Dark Wraith sheds a tear for the innocence we have lost in these modern times.


Speak your peace. Anything and everything is topical in an open forum here. We'll open some bags of chips to eat during the poetry reading that begins later. I ask that no one throw chips at the poets, though: for one thing, poets don't like chips being thrown at them; and for another thing, since they were on sale, I got the kind called "kettle chips," which are really crunchy. They make a mess on the floor, and when people step on them, pieces tend to fly like shrapnel. I'll make some espresso later, too, just in case the poetry starts getting on the slow side.



The Dark Wraith turns down the house lights and brings out some candles to enhance the literary mood.

<< 18 Comments Total
 Wild Clover blogged...

Good Morning,

Once again, I really should be in bed, rather than posting and hanging out on a rather atmospheric but empty forum. Hallloooo....am I the only one without a life?

But really, I would love to hear the take from the folks here about the red alert-our first, even if it is limited to airlines-even though it is doubtful I'll be on=line again until Monday or Tuesday. I must be off to Ohio for a wedding among the outlaws, and it will be interesting to say the least.

Also DW, did you ever see my post at the BBS about www.redmeat.com/? You would enjoy the humor...assuming of course that you are not secretly the author.

I hear thunder, so I must be off now. Enjoy the weekend everyone.

Fri Aug 11, 01:45:23 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening (or morning), Wild Clover.

Who says you're alone in here? I suppose it is a bit creepy, given that I'm lurking in the shadows just waiting to jump out and scare the willies out of the hapless commenter thinking the room is empty.

Yes, I do need to respond over at the BBS to the redmeat.com info you posted. I wasn't over there yesterday. I sort of got toasted from a beginning-of-the-academic-year department meeting I hadn't planned to attend. It was ugly, Wild Clover. They set a trap with fresh doughnuts. I knew it was a trap, but I thought I knew how to grab the doughnuts without springing the trap.

I was wrong. Little did I know that the room the doughnuts were in wasn't the actual meeting room. I grabbed the doughnuts and then made my escape through a side door that led down a hallway to another room that led to the quad. Unfortunately, the meeting was being held in that stupid second room. I walked right in and just stood there with a cake doughnut in my mouth as everyone looked at me.

My only hope was that the cake doughnut protruding from my teeth was large enough that no one would recognize me. Sadly, it wasn't three seconds before the overly-friendly vice chairman bawled out something about how I'd "finally" made it, and how I needed to grab a copy of the agenda over by the juice bar.

The "agenda" looked more like some multi-volume encyclopædia.

Lord.

Okay, I'm still alive, so I should't complain. And I most decidely will have a something to say about this latest foiled terrorist plot just as soon as I can get through the breathless media hyping of the government's propaganda. It just drives me batty that this government and the one in Britain have made it so difficult for me to believe anything the media parrots from their PR machines.

As nice as it would be to just buy the official story line, I keep thinking in the back of my head that we're talking about a plot foiled by the British and the Pakistanis. First, we're talking about the very same British whose thugs shot a "terrorist" full of bullets only to have to admit later that the guy was completely innocent. Second, we're talking about the very same Pakistanis who keep helping us by catching the "top-ranking" officials of al-Qa'ida (and do so when Bush needs a boost in his credibility), except that it always seems to turn out that, instead of catching the big fish running the terrorist networks, what the Pakistanis capture are the Pakistani equivalent of pimple-faced computer geeks whose sole connection to terrorism is that they host databasing and SMTP servers the bad guys use for a while.

I'm not impressed by Bush, nor by Blair, nor by Musharraf: all three of them are much more interested in saving their own political skins than in dealing with the wide-ranging issues underlying this terrorist cell or that terrorist plot. Incompetence rarely scores a true win; usually, it manages to spin a total fiasco into a silk purse.

But always, always, at the end of the day, that silk purse is nothing but a sow's ear with a pretty clasp sewn on it.

That's my initial reaction until I find more reasons to be negative.


The Dark Wraith should probably be more objective... but won't be until someone outlaws department meetings run by people who lie when they say, "I'd like to hear people's input," during their long-winded speeches.

Fri Aug 11, 03:14:28 AM EDT  
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good Morning Dark Wraith: I spent most of yesterday resolving travel issues. I had been scheduled for six flights in the next eight days and I decided that I didn't want to do any of them. Not because I'm afraid of terrorists. To quote John Rogers over at Kung Fu Monkey "They can suck my insouciance." I decided with my low tolerance for the idiots walking among us the airport was not the place for me. The thing that truly hit home hard for me is that when our administration trots out its spokepersons to bleat into the microphones my first reaction is one of disbelief. I know they're lying and what they are saying is, at best, a partial truth told with the intention of conveying a falsehood; all the while, knowing that they have no problem at all with bald faced shameless outhouse prevarification. I not only disbelieve the things that they say, I have almost zero confidence in any course of action/reaction they might choose to take. So far, most of their remedies have been far worse than the disease. They have the same professional track records as Garfield's doctors.

The sight of the U.S., Israel, France, Lebanon, Hizbullah posturing and scheming around their ideas for "peace" while children and the elderly are huddled in shelters and my lovely memories of Beruit are being bombed into oblivion yet again is distressing and depressing. The main players in this arena are a strong enough mixture of stupid, reactive, arrogant and delusional that region wide conflict might be a best case scenario.

Fri Aug 11, 11:16:50 AM EDT  
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good Morning Again All:

On the subject of published vs. performance piece I can well imagine a poet like Burns, who had a stellar reputation for live recitations of his own work, used the published versions as a framework rather than a static document. I have spent many nights in places after the show with the composers and performers of very well known (and expected, nay demanded) popular songs. Because we simply must do these songs that we have performed countless times over the last twenty years, for us, they are rather stale and lifeless. I have wonderfully, viciously obscene versions for many of your favorites songs. I've been known to do them just as a "fuck you" to the audience that gets surly with me. Sometimes, it's a spur of the moment thing to keep the song moving past a blank spot. On "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald" one night to fill a blank spot I sang "Now I like this song 'cause it's so fucking long and none of you know all the words"

Erotic and downright dirty poetry and songs have been with us for a long, long time. As long as the poet's main charge is the evocation of feeling they will gravitate naturally to the strong feelings produced by love and sex. Bless them for that.

Fri Aug 11, 12:08:54 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Minstrel Boy.

I was wondering if you saw this photo. That shot was taken this morning at the Israeli border with Lebanon, and it was of just one of all kinds of those nice little get-togethers massing as the sun came up over there.

Between you and me, I don't think Israel is about to sign on to a ceasefire.

Call it wild hunch.


The Dark Wraith suspects those tanks aren't there for a Baptist Revival.

Fri Aug 11, 05:08:52 PM EDT  
 Moody Blue blogged...

McMa’am (who quietly passes through on a regular basis and merely gets a “Confound it, woman.” LOL!) says:

Oh my! That poetry is a bit on the lusty side, eh, McSwain? Aye, there’s nothing wrong with a little lust, laddie. And it’s much less disturbing than war or politics.

For me, the poetry of that by-gone era illustrates just how far our society—nay, our very civilization—has declined from that glad time of the 18th Century when we were far more godly and when our the inspirational leaders of society were veritable beacons of piety of heart and purity of thought.

The Dark Wraith sheds a tear for the innocence we have lost in these modern times.


*Wiping wine off the monitor* :-)

I suppose it is a bit creepy, given that I'm lurking in the shadows just waiting to jump out and scare the willies out of the hapless commenter thinking the room is empty.

And I still ain’t askeered of ya! :-D

Moving on to other appetites:

Here is a poem appropriate for reading to an audience after Rabbie Burns’ Address to the Haggis, shortly after they have eaten the haggis. (You will need an audience with a sense of humor!) The author is unknown.

TAE A FERT

Oh, what a sleekit horrible beastie
Lurks in yer belly efter the feastie
Just as ye sit doon among yer kin
There sterts to stir an enormous wind.

The neeps and tatties and mushy peas
Stert workin’ like a gentle breeze
But soon the puddin’ wi the sauncie face
Will have ye blawin’ all ower the place.

Nae matter whit the hell ye dae
A’ bodys gonnae have tae pay
Even if ye try to stifle,
It’s like a bullet oot a rifle.

Hawd yer bum tight tae the chair
Tae try and stop the leakin’ air
Shift yersel frae cheek tae cheek
Prae tae God it does nae reek.

But aw, yer efforts go asunder
Oot it comes like a clap a thunder
Ricochets aroon the room
Michty me, a sonic boom!

God almighty it fairly reeks;
Hope I huv nae shit ma breeks
Tae the bog I better scurry
Aw whit the hell, its no ma worry.

A’ body roon aboot me chokin‘,
Wan or two are nearly bokin’
I’ll feel better for a while
Cannae help but raise a smile.

“Wis him!” I shout with accusin’ glower,
Alas too late, he’s just keeled ower
“Ye dirty bugger,” they shout and stare
I dinnae feel welcome any mair.

Where ere ye go let yer wind gan free
Sounds like just the job fur me
Whit a fuss at Rabbie's perty
Ower the sake o won wee ferty.

Fri Aug 11, 09:34:43 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Moody Blue.

My, but that was a refreshing poem you posted. I do dearly love poetry, and those bawdy poems just add such a wonderful window on what is sometimes referred to as "low" culture, which isn't so much "low" as it is "unaccepted" despite its prevalence.

Poetry and good prose is too often underrated in its power. When I was an English teacher, I would sometimes use entire class periods to read poetry, especially poetry of much earlier times, when the English language was spoken quite differently from the way it is spoken most places today. (That naughty Burns poem is an absolute delight to recite aloud, by the way.)

When I was teaching at the two-year college in one of the "bad" parts of a Midwestern city, I had to deal with young people who had no patience at all (at least, at first) for instruction in English grammar, composition, and literature. I remember the first time I decided to read a passage from Shakespeare to them. I wanted them to hear how it would have sounded in the London dialect of Shakespeare's own time, and I was especially interested in having them hear the "unofficial" version of Shakespearean English, as opposed to the form presented in the official folio that was published and polished long after the Bard's death. The "unofficial," so-called "First Folio" works have considerably "rougher" English, but it is also more modern than what was published much later.

Anyway, the students were a bit boisterous the one day when class started, although they always tried to be on good behavior. I told them that I was going to read them some Shakespeare, and I could tell they were less than thrilled with the prospect.

I thought quickly about doing something other than the passage I had originally planned, and I settled on the soliloquy from Macbeth V. v. that begins, "To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow..." I had them read along in their Shakespeare readers so they could see the spellings of the words as they heard the pronunciations. (This, by the way, was a last folio edition, so the language was more polished than I would have preferred, but was okay.)

I'll never forget how transformative doing that was, not just for them, but for me, as well. Moody Blue, you could have heard a pin drop in that room. By half-way through that short passage, most of them weren't even looking at their books anymore: they were just sitting there, looking almost blankly at me, listening.

I finished, and there was just quiet for a few seconds; then one of the young women asked if I could read something from Romeo and Juliet "that same way," which I gladly did.

We had a marvelous conversation afterward, one important theme of which was that English is not static, nor is it fixed in stone as some unchanging, unchangeable "book" of rules. Someone in the class noted that this meant her way of talking wasn't "wrong" or "improper" in some absolute sense. I told her that she was exactly right; and this gave me the perfect opportunity to explain the concepts in rhetoric of "forum" and "decorum": what you say, how you say it, and where you say it changes, not just within your own life, but also across generations. I later took the opportunity to show them several writings by Chaucer: he could write the most pious, Christian of literature one day and then write utterly obscene poetry a short time later.

The students at that school were learning how to be paralegals or court reporters. It was in those English classes that they leared that "high" language is to be neither worshipped nor derided; it is merely one dialect appropriate to a particular forum, and it is in fact entirely inappropriate in other places in one's life.

As I said, that first class where I pressed into service my knowledge of earlier forms of written and spoken English was transformative for me. It was then that I learned how to be a really effective teacher of English by using the history of the language as the fundamental platform for teaching the modern form I wanted students to learn and use when appropriate.

God! but I miss teaching English. Unfortunately, I never will again.

Hence, Moody Blue, you must occasionally suffer my mental wanderings into a good place in my past as a teacher.


The Dark Wraith looks back fondly.

Fri Aug 11, 11:51:48 PM EDT  
 The Fat Lady Sings blogged...

Minstrel Boy essentially made my point. Whatever Burns may have published for the 'church' crowd - he certainly offered up broader rhymes whilst performing at a country faire! Someone who'd just finished selling those pigs he'd been planning on for a hefty price wasn't interested in polite la-di-da with his beer. He wanted a touch of pornography - something to take home to the missus, as it were. If Burns wanted to pocket a few of that farmer's hard earned coins - he had to entertain; and you must admit - that second version is damn entertaining!

Sat Aug 12, 01:19:51 AM EDT  
 BlondeSense Liz blogged...

Oh my Dark One. I will post your graphic at once. I was waiting for the right time but today is the right time.

Sat Aug 12, 01:02:48 PM EDT  
 kablooie blogged...

So cool to read the words of Robert Burns!!! thank you. A red-haired Scottish professor of mine many years ago said that there was a hidden meaning to Auld Lang Syne, I was wondering if you ever considered what it might be (I have!) and if you noticed his reference to the lowly weed in some poems, my favorite being:

"Come, firm resolve, take thou the van
Thou stalk o' carl-hemp in man!
And let us mind, faint heart ne'er wan a lady fair
Wha does the utmost that he can
Will whyles do mair."

Sat Aug 12, 05:44:37 PM EDT  
 Mr. Shakes blogged...

Ah, Wraith!

I really must thank you for this! I'd heard that Burns composed much in the way of ribald poetry but I'd never had the pleasure of reading any until you published this. A good friend once recommended a collection of Burns' less savory work to me and I didn't get around to picking it up. That was an oversight that needs to be corrected!

It's interesting to see the two songs side by side, since together they form a good representation of the two sides of the Scottish character. Which on the one hand can be bookish, pious, reserved and at times dour. And on the other, earthy, bellicose, barbaric and vulgar. I'm not certain that either list of attributes is perfectly desirable, but hell, that's just us!

Sun Aug 13, 07:29:35 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Mr. Shakes.

I was rather wondering if you would be stopping by to see the Burns poetry.

Your comment about the dual nature of some people resonates with me. For many years, I have found myself modulating perilously between a very dignified, technical way of writing and a far more—shall we say—ribald way of expressing myself. Such is the complexity of the life well lived: to speak both in the comfort of presentable formality and the license of unfettered expression; but as long as we may write, let us write as we may, as I said in a poem that ended a play I wrote a few year back:

Time of passing, days yet to come;
Echo the voice! Vast be the drum.
Hist’ry spoken, clutch safe the sound:
Future treasures, the lost ev’r found.

Flourish of truth, peppered with lies;
Godspeed the scribe, the slain should rise.
A word breathed once opens a door.
Mansion of thought hungers for more.

Speak with thy tongue, write with thy quill;
Future and past: no place is still.
Chasm so dark, call out in faith:
“Witness beauty!” so says the Wraith.

Mon Aug 14, 12:01:14 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, kablooie.

The sad part is that some poems I would at one time have read without a second thought in class I would now not touch with a ten-foot pole. By the time I had stopped teaching English, the complaints about bawdy, ribald, or otherwise impolitic poems were just too much to take. My last reading of the second Burns poem in an English class at a community college nearly got me hanged on a sexual harrassment complaint (filed by no fewer than three students). I think that reading a poem about hemp would expose me to the risk of a complaint about promoting drug use, since I was once burned on similar charges for having students read some "beat" literature.

From my perspective, it's all a game of "Gotcha," and to some extent, most administrators see it as such; but it's a good way to put a teacher on the defensive who isn't liked by some administrator.

Sad, too. I used to love to read "The Miller's Tale" from the Canterbury Tales, but these days I'd be nuts to do the part where he kisses a woman in the dark and is thereby befuddled by the fact that she has a "beard."

I get in enough trouble once in a while these days for having my economics students read "The Manifesto of the Communist Party." Fortunately, Marx is so obtusely strident that even my Right-wing students don't exactly get many of his salient points until I explain them in class, and by then the students are so flogged from having tried to plow through it themselves that they're willing to let the whole issue drop. Nevertheless, I do get a complaint registered with the chairman every now and then. The last one didn't give any mention at all that I had spent far more time running through writings from the Right, including Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, and (my favorite) Ludwig Von Mises (my favorite because of his open declaration that the advances in civilization of the past few centuries were because of the 'White races').

Oh, well. It's still fun to be a teacher. Even the occasional stale doughnuts in the faculty lounge are a welcome benefit.


The Dark Wraith needs to lay off the doughnuts, though, lest he become a bigger man because of his chosen profession.

Mon Aug 14, 12:25:02 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Fat Lady Sings.

It's funny you should mention the relationship between what one earns and what one offers for sale.

I have learned to my pain over the years that the most consistent source of earnings on the Internet is pornography. Because I will not provide such advertisements or deliver that kind of content, I earn accordingly.

On the other hand, one of the projects on which I'm working is a novel with a few fairly steamy passages in it. I'll be curious—should I finish the project without my word processor bursting into flames—to see if it's a winner. I do plan to offer a sample of it here at The Dark Wraith Forums some time in the next month, but I'm still not sure about how much I should offer.

Anyway, that's about as far as I would go. Burns obviously had the formula down pat: piety for the lasting legacy; ribaldry for the pocket change.

Still and all, that poem was rather on the obscene side, wasn't it?


The Dark Wraith was afraid some folks might be offended by its republication here.

Mon Aug 14, 01:43:53 AM EDT  
 Mr. Shakes blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.

Thanks for sharing the poem. I liked the way you combined the alliterative half line with iambic rhyme. It was nice to see your love of the medieval and the Elizabethan shining through. Appropriate, in a comment about dual forms of expression.

Speaking different tongues does have its disadvantages, though. I do get some odd looks when words and phrases more at home in the mouth of an old Etonian come tumbling out of my working class gob. Kind of makes it hard to really fit in anywhere. I wouldn't have it any other way, though.

Tue Aug 15, 07:36:41 PM EDT  
 The Fat Lady Sings blogged...

Honey - I paid part of my way through college writing erotica. The pay was decent, I could use outrageous pseudonyms and I had a hell of a lot of fun doing it. Now - the novel I have completed (and hopefully will find an agent for) fairly rocks with those kinds of 'ribald' passages. I must say, however - I have been considering saying to hell with it, and going back to my (if you will excuse the expression) 'old profession'. Sex sells; or so they say. A certain 'romance' writer named Jaid Black has made a fortune selling her peculiar ( and boy howdy do I mean peculiar!) brand of sex; so I guess that saying is right on the money (oh I'm full of them tonight!). So go ahead and put up a sample of your novel. I’ve excerpted sections of mine on my blog (excluding certain passages, however). It would be fun to see how a male writer handles the subject. Every erotica writer I’ve ever known has been female.

Wed Aug 16, 01:20:37 AM EDT  
 Dad the Realist blogged...

Good afternoon Dark One,
Poetry can be a beautiful thing when written by inspired and talented individuals.

Alas, my writing skills are limited to an occasional bawdy limerick, or an historical essay for college.

I'm not sure if blogging counts, but if I come up with a good limerick along the way, I'll share it.

Wed Aug 16, 02:50:19 PM EDT  
 Wild Clover blogged...

I began to post early this morning, but the damn cat walked over the power button on the ups and killed my 'puter. I try again.... First, gas prices make no sense. Barrel prices went up $2 and we shot up 10 cents. Went down about 60 cents, and our price went down a nickel. Meanwhile, out here in the county, which tends to be a few cents higher, the price dropped yesterday by 20 cents. Yeah, the government can't really do much to lower gas prices directly, but sheesh, I'm about to wish they'd do some control on how often prices can be raised and lowered at the pump, as well as some indexing as to how big or small a jump is allowed(I have no idea how this would work in practicality, but this makes budgeting impossible).
My second announcement is that at great risk to life and limb, and the offices of a nice man, we rescued one of our wandering goats, who unfortunately has a broken back and is pretty crippled. The rescue involved riding the railroad access road, thru a tunnel, under a fence, up a steep slope, and into a low cave. Our hero of the day slid down the slope with a 70-80 pound goat on his lap. He gets lots of points in heaven.

Fri Aug 18, 01:46:34 PM EDT  

       

Monday, August 07, 2006

Special Analysis:
Hydrocarbon Battlefields

Coastal oil rigsThe Middle East lurches with no respite from one crisis of violence to the next in these opening years of the 21st Century. In 2002, a Western superpower attacked oil-rich Iraq, a country so debilitated by years of international sanctions that it had no substantive ability to repel the onslaught. Just prior to that invasion, the same superpower invaded Afghanistan, a nation strategically situated between oil reserves to the East and energy-hungry nations of the Western world. If not as dramatically violent, both China and Russia have moved aggressively to seal agreements with and diminish resistance by factions within nearby countries known to have large oil reserves, perhaps the most important among them being the Republic of Kazakhstan, where oil reserves girding and under the Caspian Sea represent perhaps one-and-a-half percent of all proven oil reserves in the world. Years in exploration, and at a staggering cost because of the particularly complex geology of the area, Kazakhstan is emerging as a target of commercial attention and investment by Western and Far Eastern companies and governments.

The graphic below depicts the the Middle East and the eastern part of Eurasia.


The landform of eastern Eurasia varies incredibly: from cold, Arctic tundra to soaring mountains to hot, dry deserts, the scope of natural environments is simply breathtaking in its diversity. The political, social, and economic landscapes of this region of the world are no less diverse: from repressive Communist regimes to genuine democracies, and from extraordinary wealth to grinding poverty, the governments and peoples capture every manner of experiment in human social and political organization.

Vast, powerful nations abut small, weak countries, and always there exists the potential for armed conflict arising from competition for land, natural resources, and socio-political dominance. The Western Hemisphere, putatively led by the United States, strives to hold sway in the region, principally to ensure for its citizens security in both borders and in access to the wealth of nations in the Middle East and Asia; and while the resources to be had are many, access to and control of the hydrocarbon reserves are worth far more than their weight in money and blood. China, Russia, and other nations of the Orient, Europe, and the Middle East are every bit as willing as the United States to do what is necessary to secure those hydrocarbons for their own purposes.

Shanghai Coöperation Organisation logoThe commercial competition for oil and natural gas from Eastern Europe, Greater Asia, and Asia Minor is fierce. With the economies of China and other countries in the Far East experiencing high current and projected growth rates, demand for fossil fuels to power these industrial boom economies is rising steeply, with energy needs of both manufacturers and emerging, vast middle classes outstripping local resources, which had been geared in the past to slow industrial growth and modest requirements by citizens. Largely because of the need to form a commercial bloc to compete with the West in general and the United States in particular, the Shanghai Coöperation Organisation (SCO) was formed in June of 2001: its members are China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Quoting from the SCO General Information Webpage, the stated purposes of the SCO are as follows:
"[S]trengthening mutual trust and good-neighborly relations among member states; promoting their effective cooperation in political affairs, economy and trade, scientific-technical, cultural, and educational spheres as well as in energy, transportation, tourism, and environment protection fields; joint safeguarding and presenting regional peace, security and stability; striving towards creation of democratic, just, reasonable new international political and economic order."
Efforts by the organization to further define its non-threatening nature are distilled to the assurance that, "...SCO is not a closed block and is not directed against any states and regions." Interesting in this regard is that the SCO has granted observer status to Iran, India, Mongolia, and Pakistan, with Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad making clear that Tehran will seek full membership; but the SCO recently rejected the application for observer status of the United States.

The altogether reasonable purposes stated officially by the SCO are rather less reassuring when considered in light of statements made by the advocates of the consortium. Azer Mursaliev, Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Kommersant, explains the SCO as follows: "Combined powers of countries of Shanghai Cooperation Organization, both in military and economic area, allow them to open an independent stock exchange and trade oil and gas not in US dollars, but in any other currency, including Russian Rubles."

The sentiments offered above by Mr. Mursaliev offer proof positive to some that the long-standing denomination of oil contracts in American dollars is coming to an end. This is a particularly attractive doomsday scenario for the U.S. when considered in the context of Tehran's declared interest in full member status in SCO and its much publicized claim that it is planning to open an oil bourse that would use euros rather than greenbacks. Such a threat to the dominance of the petrodollar has led some to believe the United States would use the pretext of Iran's controversial nuclear power development program to attack the Persian nation and thereby cripple its nuclear ambitions and end its financial schemes. However, as was predicted here at The Dark Wraith Forums, the planned opening on March 20, 2006, of this new oil bourse did not happen and probably will not for months if not years, despite continuing efforts by Iran and some Western media outlets to represent the opening as imminent.

Without necessarily resulting to rhetoric about the SCO being an "OPEC with bombs," the organization is clearly and with good reason concerned about security issues, strategically primary among them being commercial control of resources—specifically (although not exclusively), recoverable hydrocarbon reserves. While China is now and will continue to be a producer of fossil fuels, its growing economy will demand more and more oil and natural gas to power its industrial base. Current projections place China's demand for oil at five million barrels per day by 2020.

The graphic at left zooms in on the region around the Caspian Sea, bordered from the Northwest to the East by Kazakhstan and on the West by Russia and Azerbaijan. The areas in orange represent general fields of known hydrocarbon reserves. Even though these reservoirs represent no more than about 1½ percent of the world's total known reserves, they are nonetheless important for several reasons. First, the fields are relatively new, meaning they are still on the upswing in terms of realized yields; second, and crucially important, the fields are at a crossroads between the East and the West, offering opportunities for both Asian and European customers. The Atasu-Alashankou pipeline from the Caspian fields into China could alone deliver one million barrels per day at full capacity, meaning Kazakhstan has the potential to provide fully 20 percent of China's projected demand for oil in 2020. At the same time, even though Kazakhstan belongs to the SCO along with China, the West is an attractive market, as well. Furthermore, Russia has presented significant difficulties in Kazakhstan's dealings toward the East, attempting as it has to tighten its grip on hydrocarbons leaving the area by, among other things, imposing a "tax" it claims must be paid by the operators of the fields and pipelines.

The graphic below lays in some of the Eurasian pipelines in existence, under construction, or in some stage of planning.


As daunting as the tangle of pipelines may appear, others either exist or will come into existence within the next ten years. Furthermore, while some of the pipelines represent crude products moving to refineries and ports, other pipelines represent conduits for products being delivered to final-use customers: for example, the pipeline that appears to go through the middle of Iran from roughly South to North will deliver natural gas from Kargh Island up to pipelines running both East and West to end users in Asia. On the other hand, the pipelines on the northern arc of the Caspian Sea are for transporting crude extracted from the oil fields there to intermediaries in both Asia and Europe.

The tangle of pipelines around the Caspian renders evidence of the strategic importance of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan; and even though both are members of the SCO, their own interests will to a great extent override any possibility of unwavering loyalty to their fellow members of that bloc. Specific to that point is the map at right, which depicts the area around and to the West and South of the Caspian Sea, with only one pipeline represented, the so-called Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, so named for the three major cities close to which it passes on its way from Azerbaijan clear to the Mediterranean. (Note that the pipeline shown east of the Azeri shore of the Caspian Sea is not part of the BTC pipeline but uptakes extracted Kazakh hydrocarbons moving west.) Its rather twisted path ensures, first, that it passes through only Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey, and second, that it swings around regions of those three countries where rebels and other restive groups could interfere with the operations.

Financing of the BTC pipeline comprises a 30 percent equity contribution by the companies involved, with the remaining 70 percent of project cost provided through lending by the International Finance Corporation, which is the division of the World Bank that lends to private companies. The distribution of ownership interests in the BTC pipeline is graphically presented at left. While some of the names may be familiar to Americans, others likely are not. BP is, of course, British Petroleum, a London-based corporation with world-wide operations principally having to do with energy-related products and services. ExxonMobil is also a familiar name: it is U.S.-based and stands as the largest integrated hydrocarbon products company in the world. UNOCAL is an American, wholly-owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation, having been acquired in 2005 by Chevron to stave off an undesired takeover by a Chinese oil company. DeltaHess is a joint venture between the Saudi oil company Delta Oil and the American oil company Hess Corporation. Devon Energy Corporation is based in Oklahoma City and has oil and gas operations in North and South America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Itochu is a diversified Japanese company with subsidiary interests in oil and gas exploration and exploitation. TPAO is the Turkish Petroleum Corp. (Türkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortakligi), a government corporation with oil and gas operations in Egypt, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Iraq. STATOIL is a Norwegian-based, integrated oil and gas company involved in exploration and exploitation operations along the coastal shelf of Norway, as well as in countries across the globe. LUKOIL Oil Company is a privately owned, Russian oil and gas company and is the largest company in its industry in Russia. SOCAR is the state-owned oil and gas company of Azerbaijan.

While having no material impact on either the construction or the operation of the pipeline, criticisms of the project have been wide-ranging. Environmental concerns have been expressed regarding the potential for oil spills in ecologically sensitive areas along the route, particularly in regions like northern Turkey that are prone to large earthquakes. Claims about disruptions of local economies are persistent: for example, with three supertankers docking every day at the port outlet at Ceyhan, Turkey, local commercial fishing is said to have been severely disrupted. And allegations have been made of human and civil rights abuses that include uncompensated confiscations of land and local men being more or less forced to work on the line at inadequate wages. Little has been done to address any of the potential and actual adverse impacts of the BTC pipeline; and as the matter now stands, complaints will remain nothing more than minor background noise as BTC becomes an important link between oil fields in Kazakhstan and energy-hungry markets in Europe and the United States.

Ceyhan, Turkey, is close to the massive Incirlik Air Base, arguably the nexus of U.S. airborne military operations for all of Asia Minor and the Middle East. Warplanes from Incirlik provide ample security for the port its supertanker traffic.

The final graphic, presented at left, appears at first glance to be the same as the BTC pipeline route graphic presented earlier in this article. Careful inspection may be needed to see the addition: it can be found as a pale extension of the BTC pipeline from its outlet at the southern end of Turkey, down the eastern coastal waters of the Mediterranean, and ending in Israel. Officially announced in May of this year, the project—which will be financed by "foreign economic backing"—actually comprises four underwater pipelines that will carry fresh water, electricity, natural gas, and oil from Asia Minor to Israel, which will resell some of the oil, thereby not only securing for Israel vital resources it needs, but also putting the Jewish State on the world map as a trader in the fossil fuels so important to the growing, energy-hungry nations of the Far East, which is the market into which Israel plans to sell its oil surplus.

Astute readers of the map above will note that this pipeline complex runs down the entire Mediterranean coast not only of Lebanon, but also of Syria. As of the publication date of this article, Israel is striving to eliminate the threat posed by the relatively well-armed Lebanese militant political faction Hizballah. In view of the proposed pipeline, that threat has considerably less to do with the rockets Hizballah has been aiming at northern Israel in recent times than with the possibility that the militants could disrupt the construction and integrity of the underwater pipeline bundle. Moreover, a hostile government in Damascus arguably poses a far greater risk to the security of the pipelines than any threat presented by a menace like Hizballah, indicating that Israel must go far beyond its current campaign of destroying or otherwise crippling Hizballah. Strategically, far more important is removing the danger that Syria could disrupt construction and/or operation of the pipeline bundle. Not dealing with Syria soon would quite likely disabuse Israel's "foreign economic backing" of any interest in financing a project constructed in such a potentially hostile region of the world.


The Dark Wraith will allow readers now equipped with the information from this article to make their own predictions about the direction current Israeli military operations will take in the days and months ahead.

<< 29 Comments Total
 Debra blogged...

Methinks Israel is getting a little too big for its britches. Killing innocent people for oil. I thought oblt America did that.

I liked it better when we were teaching the world to sing. We are in big trouble and are too stupid to know it.

Thanks for the English lesson. I would have used girdling instead of girded. And I would have been wrong. Dictionaries are so helpful.

Tue Aug 08, 08:44:46 AM EDT  
 Imoral Majority blogged...

I apologize if this is a bit off the subject, but based on your economics background, I would really welcome a scholarly economic analysis of the BP Alaskan pipeline shutdown. Intuitively, it seems very possible that even with their decreased production, BP may stand to make quite a bit of money due to the increase in prices. I tried to perform a very rudamentary analysis, and it seems that BP's gross daily revenue is nearly a million dollars more per day now, and prices are sure to go up even more. In my field, Electricity Markets, witholding capacity like this is a commonly known trick to drive up prices and increase profits. Enron did it in California. Unfortunately, I just don't have the background to do any justice to the subject, so I would appreciate your thoughts on the subject.

Tue Aug 08, 01:35:40 PM EDT  
 Don blogged...

Funny how little tidbits like this never make it into mainstream news analyses. It is, however, surprising that it hadn't been noted earlier.

Very nice catch, Wraith.

Tue Aug 08, 01:46:10 PM EDT  
 Don blogged...

For information, Palast has an article posted on the Alaska shutdown. The corrosion is apparently nothing new, nor is BP's timing in its 'discovery'.

Tue Aug 08, 02:02:11 PM EDT  
 Solitaire blogged...

Ummm, how can opening a larger front, to include Syria, "protect" the construction of that pipeline? It would seem to me that open hosilities would make it so much easier for Syria to pick off the workers on any such construction attempt. Are you thinking that Israel figures itself strong enough to conquer and control Lebanon, Syria and Iran?
Or do you think that Israel is counting on our troops? Wow, that would be a major miscalculation on the part of the Israelis. Huge.

Tue Aug 08, 02:30:19 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Imoral Majority.

Your question is related to one asked by Father Tyme on the thread from the last article. I had held off answering that question in part because the next article here at The Dark Wraith Forums will be a Pulp Economics explanation of the economics concept of "elasticity"—specifically, the elasticity of demand and how it drives consumer reaction to price changes.

In summary, in economics we describe and measure consumer demand in terms of how strongly people move toward or away from a product when the price of it respectively falls or rises.

Start with the so-called Law of Demand:

When the price of a product rises, consumers tend to buy a smaller quantity of that product; when the price of a product falls, consumers tend to buy a greater quantity of that product.

Note the use of the word "tend": the Law of Demand does not declare that this will always, forever, and in every situation happen. It is, instead, a rational behavioral tendency.

Now, here is the formula for the price elasticity of demand:

(% change in quantity demanded) ÷ (% change in price)

The is a so-called "pure" number: it has no units (the units in the numerator's components and in the denominator's components all cancel out). All it does is tell us by what percentage quantity demanded changes for a one percent change in price.

Try this: suppose the price of a product goes up by, say, 10%, and this causes the quantity consumers demand of the product to fall by 8%. Using the formula to calculate the price elasticity of demand for the product, we get

            —8% ÷ 10%
            = —0.8

(The negative on the original 8% was there because the quantity demanded fell. In fact, just about all price elasticities of demand should be negative, since the signs of the numerator—the percent change in quantity demanded—and of the denominator—the percent change in the price—should be opposite because of the Law of Demand.)

So, we found for the example given that the price elasticity of demand was —0.8, and you will notice that, in the case of that product, the consumers' reaction was less than the price change: the eight percent drop in quantity demanded is less than the ten percent rise in the unit price.

Now, let's look at another scenario. Suppose the price of a product goes up by, let's say, 20%, and consumers react by purchasing 30% less of it. In this case, the price elascticity of demand would be as follows:

            —30% ÷ 20%
            = —1.5

So here we have a product where consumers react considerably more strongly to the price change. In fact, consumer reaction as a percentage is half again as sharp as the price rise, itself.

Now, let's put these two examples together to form a rule of sorts.

If the price elasticity of demand for a product is between zero (no reaction) and negative one, we say demand is "price inelastic."

On the other hand, if the price elasticity for a product is below negative one, we say demand is "price elastic."

So, with "price inelastic" products, consumers do not react much to price changes; but with "price elastic" products, consumers react strongly to price changes.

Okay, so what's driving the price elasticities of demand for various products? In principle, several factors might be involved; but even though the specifics can get tricky for specific products, the concepts, themselves, are pretty reasonable.

First, when there is no "close substitute" for a product, people will be unable to get away from a price rise. That means products with no close substitutes will tend to be more price inelastic.

Second, products that are necessities tend to be more price inelastic, too: if you have to have something come Hell or high water, you're going to pay whatever jacked-up price the manufacturer charges.

Third, items that are very small parts of your overall budget tend to be more price inelastic. Suppose a small candy bar goes from 50¢ to 60¢. That's a whopping 20% increase in the price of the candy bar, but most people will simply eat it. (Forgive the pun, there: economics humor is as lame as it gets.) That means, when the price of a candy bar goes up by a rather large percentage, the percentage drop in the number of candy bars sold is fairly minimal.

The fourth reason is really noteworthy. Price elasticity of demand for a product tends to be considerably more inelastic in the short run than in the long run. In other words, at first when a price shoots up, people will tend to pay it, partly because the search cost for alternatives far exceeds any benefit that could be gained if something cheaper that served the purpose could be found. But in the long run, once those search costs can be spread over more time, people often will find alternatives to a jacked-up price item, and they'll be able to substitute away from it.

There are other factors involved in the particular price elasticity of demand for a product, but those are the big ones.

Now, let's talk briefly about what this means to a company's revenues, and it's not all that hard to figure out: when the price elasticity of demand for a product is inelastic, a company that raises its prices will earn more revenue; on the other hand, when the price elasticity of demand for a product is elastic, a company that raises its prices will earn less revenue.

The logic is straight-forward (and the math isn't all that tough, either, believe it or not). If demand for a product is price inelastic, the company raises its price, and it loses some sales (that's the Law of Demand: price goes up, quantity demanded goes down) BUT the company gains more on unit price than it loses on unit sales. Alternatively, if demand for the product is price elastic, the company raises its price and its revenue falls because it's losing more in unit sales than it's gaining in unit price.

Got all that? Cool.

Now, what's the price elasticity for gasoline? Estimates vary, and most of them are short-run elasticities. Taking that into consideration, the price elasticity of demand for gasoline might be around, oh say, —0.16, which means that, when the price of gasoline goes up by 10%, the quantity of it consumers demand falls by a mere 1.6%. That has as its corollary, from the explanation above, that whenever gas prices go up, revenues for the sellers go up dramatically simply because very little drop in quantity demanded occurs.

Now, the long-run price elasticity of demand is going to be somewhat higher, meaning that, as people are able to substitute away from fossil fuel burning car engines or at least move toward more fuel efficient vehicles, they'll be reacting more strongly to these price increases, so the oil companies' revenues won't be going up as dramatically every time the price of fuel goes up because of one crisis or another. But in the short run, as long as people cannot and will not substitute away from gasoline, and as long as people see their fossil fuel burning, internal combustion engines as a veritable birthright, they'll eat the price rises simultaneously with bitching about them and the obscene profits the oil companies are making.

They'll also probably be a little fussy about all the people in the Middle East who have to die because of the oil companies, which have every rational incentive in the world to do anything and everything to keep the profit pipelines flowing, even if that means a whole lot of Arabs, Persians, American GIs, women, children, old people, and even the occasional dog that can't get out of the way of a bomb must in the process close their eyes forever.


The Dark Wraith will do this analysis again and in more depth in a full-blown post.

Tue Aug 08, 03:18:04 PM EDT  
 Imoral Majority blogged...

Thank you for the response, Dark Wraith. I look forward to reading the full post.

Tue Aug 08, 03:44:21 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Debra.

Forgive me, but I must confess that your comment about "girdling" versus "girded" gave me an irrepressible grin for a while. Your initial word choice wouldn't have been entirely inappropriate, as are some pseudo-homophones that get pressed into service with unexpectedly humorous consequences.

My favorite was the story told by James Kilpatrick, whose acerbic, conservative columns were far better known than his other syndicated columns collectively called "The Writer's Art," wherein he discussed points of English grammar and usage. He would on occasion quote from a newspaper or magazine article where word usage had gone bad, as in the case of the newspaper that was describing an accident where a car had gone over an embankment. The writer of the column wanted to tell readers that the car was so far down in a gulley that a winch had to be used to pull the car out. Unfortunately, the writer of the report instead told readers that the attending tow truck had used a "wench" for the job.

Indeed.



The Dark Wraith worries sometimes about men who expect women to do everything.

Tue Aug 08, 05:03:45 PM EDT  
 blackdog blogged...

Oh Dark One, regards. Excellent post, as usual.

The very idea that BP did not pig their lines for so many years simply tells me that they don't care one wit about providing a product at a good price. That I have not yet heard anyone really bitching about major utilities and energy providers doing basic preventative maintenance says alot.

I am disturbed that so many don't understand the concept of infrastructure. Or budgets either, for that matter.

While I still pay very close attention to your articles and sometimes even learn something from them, surely not everyone is so stupid as to not see just how well this violin is being played.

All we need now, well there are alot of things that could happen that would turn the economy on it's ear.

BTW, I've never owned a vehicle with more than 4 cylinders. For 35 years.

Thank you Dark Wraith for the continuing education.

Woof.

Tue Aug 08, 06:09:18 PM EDT  
 Progressive Traditionalist blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.

Just to note that most facilities have an annual shut-down for basic maintenance.

In reference to BP's Prudhoe Bay shut-down, I think the larger refiners will still run as much as they want through them, while the smaller independents will run a little short. Refiners that took a shut-down earlier in the year will reap a profit.

Tue Aug 08, 07:59:48 PM EDT  
 Mr. Shakes blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.

Oddjob is back, at least for a short while, and appears to be well.

Great post, by the way.

Tue Aug 08, 11:21:25 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Mr. Shakes.

I am glad that OddJob has made a cameo appearance. I saw him on my radar awhile ago, so I figured he was haunting his old sites for the evening.

It's good to see you over here, by the way. I was wondering if you'd get a chance to see this article. It was more than a week in the making, in part due to the deterioration of my computer. The graphics for this post actually accelerated its decline. I lost a total of 128 Megs of RAM because of the overheating that happened as I was working on the primary map, which has an original scale of 1300×1000 pixels and takes up 21 Megs of hard drive space. I am tempted to offer that original map as a poster at my e-store, maybe so people can put little pins in it wherever a new conflict breaks out in eastern Eurasia or the Middle East.

That does seem a little tacky, though, doesn't it? Profiting from war is so... so... Neo-connie.

'Neo-connie'?!


The Dark Wraith might have just coined a new pejorative.

Tue Aug 08, 11:51:16 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, blackdog.

I am wondering how many people here saw the article I published at Big Brass Blog and The UnCapitalist Journal last March about an oil spill in that pipeline. Although Big Brass Blog no longer exists, which means the articles there cannot be accessed anymore, you can read it at The UnCapitalist Journal by clicking here.

Looking back on how I reported it at the time, I could have been a little more aggressive in pointing out that the spill was disconcerting for several reasons: first, it took several days before anyone was even aware that there was a leak slowly oozing crude into the ground; and second, even after they were fully aware of the spill, the pipeline folks didn't know right away where the hole was in the pipe! That's not a good sign, you see, because the first place you look for a leak is at the joints near the ground oil (although sometimes, if the pipe is on a grade you have to follow the trail of oil back up the underbelly of the tube), and you should know exactly what to do to find the leak, even though you could have crude all over the underside of the pipe initially obscuring the hole. The fact that they couldn't find the hole tells me (speaking here from my days working in the oil and gas industry) that you're talking about a degraded pipe where a lot of corrosion on the inside had finally managed to work its way to the exterior; and the damage on the outside is not conspicuous because it's the just the end result of really bad things going on in the interior where you can't look very easily. In other words, the leak last March was just the beginning of the exterior evidence of a deterioration that had been going on inside the pipe for a whole lot longer and to a whole lot greater extent.

Alas, though, I did want to report the spill rather more to the factual side without resorting to too much speculation. Nevertheless, the problems we're hearing about now have been around for some time, and the pipeline managers could have and should have dealt with those matters well before now; but that would have meant the announcement of the line shut-down would have occurred when the oil markets weren't as totally spooked as they are these days.


The Dark Wraith does like to see a balance between maintenance of physical equipment and maintenance of obscene profits.

Wed Aug 09, 02:06:11 AM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Good morning, Dark Wraith.

I enjoyed your quote:

There once was a Senator named Joe,
Who was told by the voters to go.
He lost to Ned,
because he said,
"I enjoy being Dub-ya's ho'!"


After reading so many articles where he was catching up to Lamont, I was getting a bit worried. The first thing I saw when I logged on, was that Lieberman lost the primary! HOw about that!?!

Oh, yes. I enjoyed the main feature, Hydrocarbon Battlefields , too. Interesting stuff. It's great to be able to learn about more without having to google when you don't really know what you want to find out. Your articles tend to teach what I want to learn, plus stuff I didn't know I wanted to learn until after reading the article. In fact, those graphics about the pipelines existing, and the ones being planned are quite appreciated.

Wed Aug 09, 03:26:33 AM EDT  
 BlondeSense Liz blogged...

Good morning Dark One,
Wow. I learned a lot last night from a friend at Happy Hour about how oil works and now I have learned even more from your post. Those maps are great too.

I don't have anything to add because I'm just trying to learn all about it and try to understand why the US has to be all caught up in this when we could probably "conserve" and not have to deal with foreign oil at all... but god forbid, there is too much money to be made at the expense of expendable citizens of the world.

The whole thing makes me sick and there is probably no way to escape it and no place to go.

Wed Aug 09, 07:53:42 AM EDT  
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good Morning Dark Wraith:

Thank you for the thoughtful analysis. It's refreshing to have a fact base to build upon. The supply/demand/price lecture will be gratefully attended while wearing my small-time-capalist hat.

The thing about the Middle East in general, and Lebanon in particular that has me alarmed is the high degree of surprise the main actors seem to be dealing with. I have indeed grown weary (weary i tells ya) of the endless stream of Neocons proclaiming "Nobody predicted that" regarding things that any rational, thinking person would have seen coming miles away.

As I stated in an earlier thread, the high level of surprise has been leading to swifter more reactive actions. When a more prudent course would be to hold still, they continue going forward, when the sensible thing to do would be to withdraw, they escalate. Hizbullah shoots more rockets when they have a golden opportunity to refrain and allow the citizens of Beruit, Qana and Tyr some needed breathing room if only to bury their dead. Instead of calling for calm, the Iranian leader calls again for the destruction of Israel as the only path to lasting peace. It's so insane that all my efforts at trying to predict or devine the results have come to naught.

I cannot shake the image of being driven in a bus at a high rate of speed, somewhere, in dense fog.

Wed Aug 09, 01:14:52 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

That would, of course, be the "fog of war" about which we've been hearing so much lately, Mistrel Boy.

And it frustrates me to no end that careful analysis from facts instead of disreputable prior assumptions leads the neo-cons from one "nobody could have predicted that" to the next "nobody could have predicted that."

It doesn't take that much effort to walk through and deduce likely consequences. It doesn't take much more to go the next step and use inductive reasoning to get to probable outcomes of alternate policy actions. Sometimes I just shake my head, especially at the American people, who want simplistic analyses without all the nuances that swiftly sweep away easy, feel-good solutions.

Lord! but this is a good century for despots and fools. I suppose the last century wasn't much better; but for God's sake, the neo-conservatives have actually packaged stupidity and made a mint by selling it.


The Dark Wraith wishes the FDA would look into the warning label on the Extra-Large portions of Stupid Policies™ being sold these days.

Wed Aug 09, 01:48:30 PM EDT  
 Dad the Realist blogged...

Good afternoon Dark One. Always a pleasure to get an education from a realist. I do have a question to pose, and I'm sure it's been asked before. When are the oil corporations and the neocons interests going to split? I would think that constant war would eventually, especially a possible limited nuclear war(if there can be such a thing) cut into the bottom line. If the American economy crashes, and the world economy along with it, Big Oil is going to lose trillions of dollars, would it not? Or am I missing something here? The only other explanation would be utter and complete insanity.

Wed Aug 09, 02:42:51 PM EDT  
 father tyme blogged...

DW,
I think we might be underestimating (misunderestimating) the neo-con high command. Rove isn't your run-of-the-mill conservative. Credit is due him for incredible foresight to get Cheney/Wolfowicz PNAC to fruition.
It's hard to think of him as so brilliant at political conniving that he can't add 2 + 2.
This is fairly obtuse but if he can step back and look at the bigger picture then make decisions based on what he sees, why do we presume that these 'little problems' that keep popping up are spontaneous and not his doing? His track record IS impressive.
Computers can analyze and project a multitude of potential occurrences given suitable data. Rove has that data and when needed seems capable of manufacturing it. Always one step ahead of the next situation. We are cattle being led to slaughter. By the time we take action on one incident, he has another in the making.
I guess you can do a lot with a couple of trillion in Swiss banks.
Isn't it time we went on the offensive?
Do I give him too much credit?

Wed Aug 09, 05:03:27 PM EDT  
 Progressive Traditionalist blogged...

Good morning, Mr Wraith.

By reading the Dark Wraith Forums, I learned that raiding my neighbor's refrigerator is not "free," but represents a huge opportunity cost.

Now, I learn that to look elsewhere for food would result in an initial price elasticity due to the search costs.

Lucky I just got a coupon for a free pizza in the mail.

Hey! Wait a minute....
Is this pizza free?

Wed Aug 09, 08:54:54 PM EDT  
 LindiBee blogged...

Regarding Blackdog's comment about BP not pigging their lines until recently, I was just reading a timely story by Greg Palast on that very subject.
BTW, what happened to Big Brass Blog? Are they considering moving to a new site? I'm very happy to hear about the recent appearance of Oddjob- I'd hate to think that he'd been whisked away by Homeland Security or John Ashcroft's successors. :)

Wed Aug 09, 10:10:41 PM EDT  
 Mr. Shakes blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.

It's good to be back. Work has been simply insane for the last few months, and I have been left with little energy for anything else. But good lord, was it worth it. The stellar review that resulted from all my efforts culminated in a gobsmacking 4% increase in pay. A number which barely keeps me ahead of the bullshit inflation figure the Fed cranks out. I shudder to think at the insult my less fortunate coworkers must have received. However, thanks to the law of substitution we have little to worry about. We can eat some dirt and then go gas up our cars with horse piss to celebrate (if you thought this example of economics humor was lame, btw, then you only have yourself to blame).

Anyway, this was a good post because, as others have pointed out, it dives beneath the surface clutter and reaches down to the real casus belli: oil. And there I was thinking that Israel merely wanted to pound the shit out of Hizbollah and maybe take a swipe at those Iranian nuclear facilities along the way. I should have known better.

It's interesting that while the powers that be continue to insist that peak oil lies over the distant horizon, they are each jockeying their chess pieces around that map of yours in an effort to be the best prepared for a crisis thay all claim doesn't exist: We could build a bunch of wind farms and stuff, but think of the cash we can make if we corner the oil market in a time when demand is outstripping supply! Let's build tanks, instead! Yeesh. Thank God I am no longer eligible for the draft.

Wed Aug 09, 11:52:27 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Mr. Shakes.

Yes, I am to have a raise in for this coming year: a combination of seniority and cost of living will, since the last one, reflect an annualized increase of just over three percent, which means that in real terms I shall still be making less than I was four years ago, which was in real terms less than I made ten years ago. This year, between my various teaching gigs—which demand enough work from me to suck my brain dry—I'll break 22 grand. (That's right: $22,000. Who says teaching isn't the way to untold riches?)

Fortunately, I actually like Ramen noodles. Even more fortunately, not only do the Powers That Be worry a little too much about my classroom popularity to ice me, but I'm also somewhat on the indispensible side because I know how to do the inter-campus TV courses, as well as the brain-bender online courses, which by the way are using software from the dominant company in the industry that should have been taken out and shot years ago for its inability to actually move forward from the hazy era between DOS and Windows.

Sorry for that little rant, there. I sometimes forget that, as an economist, I know very well that a reasonably efficient market pays its production factors the values of their respective marginal products. In plain English, that means I'm being paid what I'm worth; and a Classical economist would be very quick to point out that, if I don't like the situation, then I can move on unless I am already doing that which reflects my greatest productivity. A Keynesian wouldn't be of much more comfort: by such reasoning, the only way an economy can continue to grow in real terms with excess growth of the money supply as the propulsion is if at least one factor of production is unable to capture its share of the inflation being generated by the growing overhang of money; so as long as the compensation to labor lags the general inflation rate, real output can continue to grow and the remaining factors of production—land, physical capital, and the reward to the risk of ownership—can capture their share of inflationary price rises and real output increases.

God! but I love economics.

And yes, it is my considered judgment, backed by the evidence as I have offered it in this article, that the current "Middle East crisis" is no 'crisis' at all; it is, instead, business as usual. The command of resources valuable in a given era is the root of great suffering visited upon those who must live, fight, and die for the wealth of nations and the nobility that backs the sovereigns thereof.

Israel wants to be a player. It will do what is necessary to achieve that goal, and it will face its ancient enemies in its quest, as it has many times before.

The difference this time is that, unlike at many crucial times in the history of its people, Israel is far better armed and therefore far more likely to succeed in its ambitions.

Mr. Shakes, you and I—and many who visit here—are not 'far better armed': consequently, we must adjust our ambitions accordingly. I have come to realize at this late time in my life that knowledge is power only to the extent that power can be fashioned to include a hazy understanding of the full scope of the common life's destiny.

And yet, Mr. Shakes, we nevertheless live on, laugh occasionally, and reach deep within ourselves to find the courage to smile at the irony while raging at the insanity of it all.

Such is the good life, one that ends with a furrow in the brow and a grin on the lips.


The Dark Wraith is glad you're back, Mr. Shakes.

Thu Aug 10, 12:54:46 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Dad the Realist.

I'm going to tell you something that might upset you and a number of my other readers and friends here. It has to do with a certain way of thinking: an understanding, if you will, about nuclear weapons. It is not necessarily a view to which I subscribe, even though I do see the way the reasoning and factual basis come about from generation to generation.

I'll tell you a story to illustrate the point.

One of the old nuclear physicists who was in college in the late 1960s and early 1970s likes to describe life on the college campus at Berkley in that era. He and his fellow "quant jocks"—the young men who were steeped in math and science courses—were being bathed in a world of equations, calculations, data, and models having to do with the stuff of dreams and nightmares: the precise numbers involved in making a rocket go where it was supposed to, the exact dimensions of beams to make a bridge withstand the loads anticipated for it, the perfect quantities for the metrics of an internal combustion engine's parts so it would run at peak efficiency, and all manner of other things that require unblinking ability to deploy awesome mathematics to the industrial cavern of the modern age.

This fellow—a young, hot-shot physics student—would try to sit on the quad and enjoy the springtime air, but he was vexed by the loud megaphones coming from the leaders of the student demonstrations against the war (and against all manner of other things, too, of course). He couldn't help but listen every now and then. The one particularly agitated student protester was haranguing his listeners about the nuclear bombs that were going to kill everyone: a nuke hitting LA was going to burn everything to a cinder on their beautiful campus, that's what it was going to do; and the only way to stop that from happening was "unilateral disarmament NOW!"

The physicist says that he grabbed his notebook of paper and his slide rule, and he quickly went to work figuring out exactly what a nuclear bomb of, say, one megaton would actually do to the campus if it hit downtown LA.

Sure enough, it would not create even "a warm breeze" (in his exact words) at the campus.

The physicist in retrospect laments wryly that this, of course, didn't matter at all at the time: the young student protester—being a vibrant, intense, dedicated leader—would be believed. He would also get fucked by all the pretty hippy girls, and he'd get pleasurably stoned and drunk every night, and he'd finish his major in philosophy and ultimately get his Ph.D. and live happily ever after in the cloistered halls of academia.

That was exactly what happened, too, by the way.

The physics student couldn't find a girl interested in a "numbers creep," and he didn't have any interest in finding sycophantic students to join him and his friends at the table in the student union where they'd throw equations, numbers, books of data, and ideas around half the night.

The physicist went on to a career designing nuclear weapons, first as an officer and then as a civilian. He and his fellow (what we now call) "geeks" built the massive engine of mutually assured destruction that, by luck or brilliance, managed to keep that nuke from ever landing on LA, where it would have killed several million people at the same time it proved that hot-headed young rebel thoroughly wrong.

Many, if not most, military planners know very well that the Earth would not come to an end with a nuclear exchange. They really, truly, earnestly, and genuinely believe that; and they have all kinds of information to back up that belief.

To you and I, Dad the Realist, nuclear war would be the end of everything: it would be a human catastrophe with no parallel in history. Society as we know it would be so wrecked that civilization, itself, would teeter on the abyss of irrelevance. Many ecosystems would be disrupted irreparably. The extent, dimensions, and depth of the disaster would be beyond imagination.

But that's not how a planner would see it. Civilization would proceed onward, primarily because the military had planned for such a time—a time we call a "twilight scenario." More importantly, even if one were to cabin a discussion of nuclear war within the scope of a nuclear exchange by two superpowers, both would endure the first, second, and even third volleys. Now, take the use of nuclear weapons out of scenarios of "exchange" and instead consider what would happen when a limited use of nuclear devices was employed by a single nuclear state: you are talking about very limited consequences: in a single use of a handful of such weapons, a country that was attacked would be heavily damaged. The functionality of the victim nation's infrastructure would be compromised beyond usefulness; perhaps hundreds of thousands of individuals would be killed, maimed, or otherwise turned into refugees; and the capacity to wage retaliatory war would be utterly and pretty much permanently crippled.

That's how a military planner would see it.

So, no, nuclear war is not unthinkable to those people, nor is it entirely unthinkable to those in very high political and business positions who see nuclear war in that same way. It would be horrific, disruptive, and otherwise very bad; but it wouldn't be the end of the world as we know it.

And if it were a matter of a "better" military, political, and/or business environment in the aftermath of the destruction, it would be worthy of consideration.

Or, at the very least, of contingency planning.


The Dark Wraith trusts you understand why I've written what seems perilously close to an apology for the monsters among us.

Thu Aug 10, 01:49:42 AM EDT  
 Dad the Realist blogged...

No Wraith, I don't see it as an apology, it's a realistic assessement and I appreciate the candor.

If the time ever came that this scenario happens, I pray that I live long enough to extract my pound of flesh from these "people".

Thu Aug 10, 06:53:38 AM EDT  
 The Minstrel Boy blogged...

Good Morning Dark Wraith:

Nothing like a little sunny prognostication to start the day huh? The scene I remember well from Dr. Strangelove is the one where the main characters (most played by peter sellars) are in the "war room" and they realize the game is up. they start going to the "survival" plans, mineshafts, beautiful women (at an acceptable level of beauty to keep the men interested in repopulating the earth).

While I agree and take a small measure of comfort in knowing that they probably can't incinerate us in one big volley or even two or three. I worry about a world where that has become somehow acceptable. I can also imagine neoconnies (great perjorative by the way) talking about how the failure of will in the afghan or iraqi conflict was in not being strong enough to use nuclear capability. i have heard tactics wonks lament not nuking the chinese from korea, and not going nuke on haiphong and hanoi. if they ever get the picture that they can use these things and survive we will all be in some truly deep kim chee.

Thu Aug 10, 11:24:00 AM EDT  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

To you and I, Dad the Realist, nuclear war would be the end of everything: it would be a human catastrophe with no parallel in history. Society as we know it would be so wrecked that civilization, itself, would teeter on the abyss of irrelevance.

Exactly; kind of a societal EMP if you will.

Thu Aug 10, 01:05:18 PM EDT  
 Moody Blue blogged...

This post is absolutely fantastic, Wraith. When you mentioned addressing the oil pipelines on your Forum, I never would have guessed it would have taken so much work. Thank you so much for these extraordinary and excellent details.

This puts another more realistic perspective on what the true goals seem to be in the M.E.: control of all the land and all the resources?

Blood for oil?

Quoth the Dark Wraith:

8/08/06

If economics weren't so darned good at explaining war, greed, and man's inhumanity toward his fellow man, the subject would be altogether unworthy of study by the civilized scholar.

Most appropriate.

Interesting thoughts and discussion in the comments.

Still, I need to have hope.

Fri Aug 11, 08:43:17 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Moody Blue.

I have to tell you, this article generated a fair amount of interest. It seems that most people were entirely unaware of the pipeline deal—which, by the way, has been in the works for several years.

I thought it was kind of interesting that this article got picked up by some news aggregators (but not one of them came here; they were all grabbing the feed from the cross-post I did of this article at The UnCapitalist Journal). One of the news aggregators' editors wrote the summary for the article by saying that the article was about the author's (that's my) claim that the Shanghai Coöperation Organisation is an "OPEC with bombs"!

No, that's not what the article is about, for Heaven's sake; I just quoted in passing a somewhat over-the-top statement made by some academic sort (a fellow who, I suspect, is a shill for the Reverend Sun Myung Moon, given where he managed to get that rather incendiary statement initially published).

Grr.

Fortunately, anyone who actually read my article clear to the end found out that it is obviously not primarily about the SCO at all.

Still, it would be nice if the more mainstream news media would at least get the news right.

I suppose I should be grateful for the publicity, although I wish at least some of it had been directed here rather than to the cross-post. Oh, well, we take what we can get as far as exposure goes.


The Dark Wraith should be happy that not too many new readers came here when the house was such a mess.

Sat Aug 12, 01:20:50 AM EDT