Friday, May 12, 2006

Inflammatory Opinion:
Before the Storm, the Rant

The stock market has just had two of the hardest slaughterhouse days for bulls in recent months, platinum is at its all-time high, gold is in the stratosphere, and so are a whole host of other metals. The dollar has slid against the euro to the point where what I thought wouldn't happen becomes rather likely: full and swift movement of the global financial community toward denomination of international commodities contracts in euros instead of dollars. That means more than just the end of the heady days when every commodity trader, regardless of native language, said "dollars": it means the United States no longer serves as the world banker, so it doesn't get banker's privilege in capital markets and neither do its citizens; it also means commodities prices are no longer tethered to dollars, so as the dollar sinks into Third World status, imports become more and more expensive. It shouldn't take a math-geek economist to figure out what that's going to mean for the price of gasoline in the years ahead (the chorus of apocalyptic types and their refrain about "Peak Oil" notwithstanding).

Now, put skyrocketing prices on imports together with all the U.S. companies that have headed overseas because the reverse was true for so long, and you've got a pretty dire mix. Throw into that brew the fact that many, many Americans are trying to hold onto their lifestyles by drawing down their net wealth through debt, which will become more expensive in a world where we aren't the bankers who get the preferred rates, and that mix starts to turn pretty toxic. Finally, add in a dash of seething inflation that's going to be the only way the Fed can help to control the situation, and we'll eventually have a cocktail strong enough to knock a neo-con right off the gallows that have been built for him.

Meanwhile, the Shangai Coöperation Organization—an organization of which, I might point out, almost no one has ever even heard—is rapidly tying up oil and natural gas resources, along with pipeline routes, throughout Central Asia and into the Middle East, putting our own allies like Turkey and India into the vice grip between a war organization called NATO and a rabidly mercantilist organization comprising China, Russia, and (shock of all shocks) Iran.

This is happening in the context of China plowing into full commercial relationship with Cuba to get to massive offshore oil reserves in that latter country; and this is happening in the context of that same China slithering all around the newly-minted Leftist states of South America, snuggling into bed with those nations' little populist governments to gain leverage on even more strategic hydrocarbon assets and general trade routes.

And here we are, sitting on our fat butts waiting for the world to crawl to us because our guns go "BOOM-BOOM" really loudly, which is good because about the only way the neo-cons in Washington have in their limited intellectual repertoire for us now to stop the Shanghai Coöperation Organization from just about wrapping up a major piece of the planet for its own, exclusive playground for the remainder of this century is if we bomb Iran so massively that, not only does the Persian Pest go away in a vaporous crater, but the Chinese and the Russians are so stunned by our sheer willingness to violence that they back down... at least for a while. Don't bet on that being a great solution, though. The claim that the United States spends enormously more on its military than do the Chinese is elegantly flawed: that calculation is based upon the artificial exchange rate, about eight yuan to the dollar, China maintains. If the real exchange rate were used for comparison—purchasing power parity puts it at maybe two to three yuan to the greenback—instead of the phony exchange rate, the Chinese military budget would get a whole lot more attention inside the Beltway and at the Pentagon.

That means the neo-cons, backed into a corner far enough that they simply have to clobber Iran, will learn an old lesson from the history books: mercantilist cartels can transform with lightning speed and stunning lethality into mutual defense accords.

Ah, but the Bush Administration is trumpeting how great the economy is, and the media can't help itself but keep parroting all the good-news statistics that don't have even the remotest connection anymore to what real people are experiencing.

Those of you who have read articles here at The Dark Wraith Forums know there is a tendency toward pessimism. The more the government and the lackeys in the news media pretend that what's happening isn't happening, the more pessimistic the articles here will become.

Ignoring the problems, as has been and will continue to be the culture of the politicians and the mainstream news media, is going to make the river out of Hell just that much less navigable. So, until that river turns to ice—which will most likely entail Hell freezing over—I shall remain the darkest Dark Wraith; and what I predict will in retrospect probably have been rather on the optimistic side. This is not an exercise in "speaking truth to power"; the powers in Washington—both Republican and Democrat alike—listen not to unvarnished truth, but rather to rhetorical affirmation. No one—not the Republicans, not the Democrats, and certainly not the mainstream news media—wants to be shown the straight-as-an-arrow road from here to the abyss.

That's fine, though: they'll see it when we all get there.


The Dark Wraith will proceed without delusion of grand effect on outcomes.

<< 23 Comments Total
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

"A new way to trade the housing market"

"Introducing housing derivatives, which debut on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on May 22."


"Those who still want to speculate in the housing market, or more likely, those interested in hedging, have a new set of vehicles. Starting May 22, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) will begin trading derivatives based on home prices."

That's the title, sub-title, and lead sentences of an article at Reuters. Perhaps the Wraith would care to speculate on whether this is just a ploy to disguise the fact the housing/real estate market is headed into the poopchute.

Full text of article is at http://tinyurl.com/q2nx7

Sat May 13, 12:08:37 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Peter.

It's a hedge. That means those who want to be covered on the downside can go short the contracts and profit on the collapse.

Once the market stabilizes again, the contracts can then be used to control cash flow volatility for home builders, secondary mortgage market participants, and banks.

But don't think for a minute this whole thing sounds great for anyone reading this blog. Futures markets are for pros, not for average people who simply want to make some money the quick and easy way.

To do that, you become a government contractor in Iraq.


The Dark Wraith is available for consulting in such ventures.

Sat May 13, 12:23:57 AM EDT  
 The Fat Lady Sings blogged...

I'm with the barfly’s over at Nightbird. Time to break out the whiskey and do some serious elbow bending. Never has the aphorism "May you live in interesting times" seemed so much like a curse, rather than a blessing.

Sat May 13, 03:29:49 AM EDT  
 say it hot blogged...

I'm not too knowledgeable in these things...but at this rate, does it seem to you like we are headed for another depression?

Sat May 13, 09:56:49 AM EDT  
 father tyme blogged...

Dark Wraith,
How difficult would it have been to have orchestrated this quagmire we're facing? Since the PNAC participants are somewhet(?) better off than 99% of the rest of us, do they stand to gain in the coming dark ages because of their planning of the end?
Is it possible that this was the ultimate design of the NeoCons?
Did they think they were the only "smart" ones on the planet and not consider, in their hubris, that another faction (the Chinese) could trump them?
And the obvious question, short of mass murder, what can we do about it? Oh, and what do we need for world peace while you're at it?
(If it's not too much trouble!)

Sat May 13, 10:02:53 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, Father Tyme.

I do know that some pieces of the emerging debacle were actually planned and forecast by the neo-cons. In the late 1990s, a cabal of them actually wrote about the desirable end result of attacking Iraq being the break-up of that country into mini-states that would be more vulnerable to Western control. I also know that they don't have a problem with a domestic economy strongly bifurcating: this is a common ideal going clear back to Classical economics: a massive underclass working at low wages to support a thin upperclass of capitalists. Call it the economics of Nietzschism; or, alternately, call it the capitalism of fascism.

I am entirely unimpressed with the general neo-con model, however: what they want and what the get might very well go together nicely, but I doubt seriously that they have the intellectual, diplomatic, military, and life-experience skills to come out the winner in the game they're playing.

This whole game was what I laid out in my series, "The 21st Century," last year. Although that four-article series was very well received, I suspect that, at the time, it was more of a social science fiction story than it was a roadmap for what was coming. At the time, even I pulled my punches at the very end, trying to tie the whole series up with what some rightly perceived at the time as a note of understated, subtle optimism.

In retrospect, I should have been clearer: this is what the neo-cons want, and it will happen; consequentially, because they're imbeciles, the result will be hugely adverse to all of us, including them... but only if, once we've lost the game, we turn our attention to those neo-con architects and drag them kicking and screaming to the gallows.

As I've made clear quite recently, in my judgment the rule of law has been made a thorough and utter ass on display for all to see should they so choose. Absent the rule of law, and absent the fear of the fist of law, the rule of the mob may come to bear.

Only then, Father Tyme, will we have closure for the gathering night of this aspiring and failed Empire of Fools.


The Dark Wraith will be around to chronicle the events.

Sat May 13, 10:49:55 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, Say It Hot. Welcome to The Dark Wraith Forums. I hope you'll become a regular visitor: here, no small effort is expended in showing not just the currency of economics and geo-politics at their confluence, but also how it all works. The article from which this thread arises is just my warning shot in what will be a series of posts demonstrating the elements of the looming problems and why they're happening.

To your question, I have something along the lines of an engineer's perspective. Many problems build for quite a long time before they become starkly evident. Importantly, even when such unattended problems become known, physical systems often give sharp or obvious warnings before becoming irreparable.

Cars are a good example. You can drive most cars for a very long time without doing all the responsible and regular maintenance. Eventually, a car will do something—make noises, drive poorly, or show unusual and abnormal wear—that should serve as a clear sign that it's time to stop being irresponsible and put down quite a bit of money to get things right.

The same, in my judgment, can be said of the Earth's weather. We've played around far too long, and the planet is giving us warning shots now. We need to stop being irresponsible, and we need to plunk down what will be a lot of money to fix what we should have taken car of all along. Al Gore's apocalyptic new movie notwithstanding, we could go on somewhat longer and still get by with our irresponsible behavior, but the longer we wait, the more it will cost to fix what we've done.

Only after a very long period of inattention does a well-designed physical system collapse under the weight of accumulated problems: one day, the car simply stops working; one day, the Earth simply stops being amenable to human biological systems.

Some people call these precipices "tipping points"; I prefer the more mathematical term "catastrophe nodes," but the word 'catastrophe' has a normative feel to it. "Catastrophe" in a technical sense is merely a very sudden shift from one state to another.

Now, that ramble has to do with an economic depression as follows: the global financial system is a well-designed, self-sustaining, extraordinarily robust machine. Economic apocalypse isn't something lurking around every corner as the financial conspiracy theorists breathlessly howl. The system bends, moves, reacts, and adjusts with amazing precision and sentience: it is a rational, albeit unemotive, animal. It doesn't punish the neo-cons because they're neo-cons any more than it punished liberal American Presidential administrations because they were soft-hearted on the poor. The global financial system doesn't work that way; instead, it reacts, adjusts, and adapts to the incumbent geo-political/economic environment of the times.

Eventually, however, that reaction can be adverse to some or all of the parts of the system: the state must change "catastrophically," in the technical sense of that word.

To us as people living within a nation that functions within and largely as a consequence of that system, the result of a hard shift could be awful: the economy might have to back down; and a significant amount of its physical and human capital might have to simply be abandoned in order for the economy to re-align for future growth. That's a cold way of describing a bad recession, perhaps even a depression.

But remember what I said above: systems often give warnings before they have to "catastrophically" shift.

Gold at $725 per ounce is like a fever: the global financial system is telling us—almost screaming at us—that there's a severe problem. The dollar dropping precipitously against the euro is that same fever. We ignore it at our own peril; the body will take care of the problem its own way if we don't.

If the greenback isn't brought back up, the global financial system will begin to move away from our currency as the basis for the millions and millions of international transactions that happen across the planet every year. If the Chinese aren't forced to go swiftly to purchasing power parity of the yuan against the dollar, they'll be dragged down into Hell right along with us; and more importantly, we'll be dragged down into the Hell of their spiraling inflation right along with them. They've printed yuan in ungodly, inappropriate amounts for years in a mercantilist game to play catch-up, and we've let them do it. Now, that yuan overhang in the world markets is going to go lapping right back to their shores, and all that "miracle growth" will be seen for what it was all along: a short-term, inflation-push illusion. The Chinese need to come to grips with their foolish ways, just like we need to come to grips with our profligate and unsustainable, debt-driven growth.

We borrow as a country, we borrow as commerial enterprises, we borrow as households, and we borrow as individuals. Eventually, we need to knock it off.

Otherwise, the global system will simply have to adjust, and it will have to do so "catastrophically."

We have the warning signs in our collective faces. The question now is simple: do we have the reparative strength in our national heart?


The Dark Wraith does not like the answer he contemplates for that question.

Sat May 13, 11:36:19 AM EDT  
 Jersey Cynic blogged...

Peter - speaking as a realtor for the past 10 years, I can tell you that what is happening right now is THE biggest scam that is going on anywhere -- STARTING with the realtors, and spreading right through to the home inspectors, appraisors, mortgage lenders (fannie, freddie, etc.) and ending, well -- not sure...this is where I get confused.
Dark One - Isn't China (ASIA) buying? funding? lending to the buyers? these mortgage notes. How are they doing this - with dollars or their currency? Also, haven't they stopped alot of the funding of such recently? Wouldn't a collapse be just as bad for Asia as the US?
(BTW - I'm not renewing my license this year - can't stand it anymore. I can no longer help people buy their dream - it's come down to 'selling' them a potential nightmare)
SO........

I can't afford to buy gold - the actual physical gold that is (I don't think any other form of ownership is going to play out too well, i.e. gold trusts, ETF's,)
What Peter mentions above is VERY interesting to me, but why can't the average joe get in on this. This seems like a no brainer to me- but I'm pretty stupid so it frustrates me that because of that I can't or shouldn't get involved. Is that why it's so complicated -- so the average joe can't get a piece, or do you need a shitload of money just to get in? -- I would GLADLY pay you a consulting fee to tell me how to do this.

Maybe the best thing to do would be to cut our losses now and trade our dollars for euros. Easier and safer? Also, I'm looking into taking all qualified retirement monies now, paying the penalty for early w/d since I'm not too confident much will be there in 20 years when we can have it

I better stop now - I'm not making sense anymore am I?

Sat May 13, 11:38:44 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Jersey Cynic. The core questions you're asking are ones I receive quite frequently, so in a couple of hours I'm going to put up a post explaining how international trade and debt work hand-in-hand. It won't be some extremely technical, mathematical explanation; and I hope it will be a decent, understandable explanation, so it will go under my Pulp Economics category, where I try to make economics and finance concepts accessible and logical to as many people as possible.



The Dark Wraith asks you to stay tuned.

Sat May 13, 01:07:28 PM EDT  
 Stephen Benson blogged...

good morning dark wraith: i would like to thank you for your encouragement on reading "the great wave" by david hackett fisher. while i can notice and agree with your criticism, there are many, many, things in that book which make me go "hmmmmmm." i am in the process of digesting this post (i usually go through a couple of readings), looking forward to the next ones. in defense of pessimism, i have noticed that the true pessimists are usually delighted when it turns out that they were wrong, it just doesn't happen often enough for them to cease their pessimism. and it is somehow, more noble to be a pessimist than a cynic. at least a pessimist has the good grace to be dour about it.

Sat May 13, 01:50:10 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Haven't really read your most recent post yet, but I wanted to note that while grocery shopping yesterday I happened upon Kevin Phillips most recent book ("American Theocracy"), and that from the little I skimmed of it I see he makes many of the same observations you make (if not in as detailed a manner), but through tying them to the historical precedents of Rome, Spain, the Netherlands, and Great Britain.

He points out that at the ends of their respective runs at world supremacy they had some strong parallels to each other,

and to us at this present time..........

- oddjob

Mon May 15, 09:00:11 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, OddJob.

I suppose it should trouble me that Kevin Phillips and I are in agreement on current events. As you note and from what I've heard about American Theocracy, Mr. Phillips focuses on the historical parallels between the current situation in the U.S. and that of other empires when they were in decline.

As you know, being one of my long-time readers, I don't often go too far into historical parallels (my article, "The Ancient Future," notwithstanding), at least not across large scales of time. It has always been my hope against quite a body of evidence to the contrary that the respective destinies of nations are not sealed by a set of rock-solid but difficult to define principles of political mechanics.

I suppose I shouldn't resist the urge, myself, to point out the parallels and the near-certainty with which events will now unfold for the United States. To do so, however, would be for me to resign my commission as a rank pessimist and don the mantle of an utter and insufferable curmudgeon.


The Dark Wraith isn't sure that would be good for his health, though.

Mon May 15, 09:43:09 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Parallels don't equal inevitable outcomes.

OTOH, similarities are data worth noting.

The little skimming I did suggests Mr. Phillips feels the same.


He has a most intense loathing of Republican politics a la Family Bush, Inc., strong enough to have caused him to leave that party.

I can understand all of that..........

- oddjob

Mon May 15, 10:21:32 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, OddJob.

During Kevin Phillips' break-up with the Republican Party—a process that began in the 1990s—commentators were starting to refer to him as a "maverick Republican" analyst.

Ever since John McCain started strutting around with that wholly incorrect label of "maverick Republican," I have been turned off by anyone who's been so labeled. That isn't fair to Phillips, I shall conceded. Unlike people such as Buckley and Gingrich, who have only recently begun the "I'm not one of them" chorus to save their own butts from the ugly backlash building against the neo-cons, Phillips was moving into independent mode when the Republican Party was still in ascendance. That makes him different.

Falsely, perhaps, I hold out hope that a strongly intelligent wing of the Republican Party can yet re-emerge unfettered by fear of the extreme secular and religious Right.

It is, of course, their problem to find the wherewithal to recapture the Republican Party, just like it's the problem of the strong Democrats to recapture their Party from its appeasement weaklings and opportunists.


The Dark Wraith is now suddenly more pessimistic than he was when he got up this morning.

Mon May 15, 01:47:53 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

A Toles rant (in cartoon form) from last week that is good for the soul.

- oddjob

Mon May 15, 01:55:09 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

More political cocaine for the true believers from the Pusher.

Note the characterization of the economy and how it got to be that way......

- oddjob

Mon May 15, 02:27:13 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Yahoo News has mucked with the addresses. Here's the right one.

- oddjob

Mon May 15, 03:10:44 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, OddJob.

I find it most telling that He of the Cloven Hoof is out and about speaking. This is a fellow who has a general habit of personally avoiding the limelight; but there he was—standing tall, taking questions and giving answers, spinning the stories of the day like a man on fire.

Like a man with whom the Bush Administration has no fear of being associated at this time.


The Dark Wraith likes tea, if for no other reason than that the leaves are a good read.

Tue May 16, 10:21:18 AM EDT  
 Jersey Cynic blogged...

Oddjob - Did you catch Kevin Phillips interview on Colbert last night? (re-run?) Should be up on CC site. It was great..

Tue May 16, 11:26:41 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

No, I missed it, but I've heard Kevin interviewed before, and at least with regards to the Bush family, for me listening to him is quite powerful.

It's so empowering to realize there are "bigwigs" who see exactly what you do, you know?

- oddjob

Tue May 16, 12:45:56 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Thanks, DW, for that observation. I hadn't thought of it that way......

- oddjob

Tue May 16, 12:46:22 PM EDT  
 Josh blogged...

Dark Wraith,

It seems the dollar continues to tumble.

Any predictions on when the move to the Euro will come?

Also, do you know much about the Sunburn anti-ship missile? Seems to be just as big a problem for possible conflict in Iran as the SCO is.

Wed May 17, 01:18:14 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Josh. Welcome.

First, concerning the Sunburn missile, you are correct: it's a major problem. The beast is something like Mach 2.2 on the run. That means it's probably too fast to be effectively neutralized by ship-borne anti-missile systems, especially if the target has multiple incomings clustered. Even one or two survivors in the attack would lay severe damage. Although an aircraft carrier wouldn't be sunk, it would be rendered useless for combat.

Worse is that the Sunburns are apparently set in emplacements in the hills along the Strait of Hormuz, which makes them considerably more difficult not only to locate, but also to hit with destructive fire. Even worse, verification of target destruction wouldn't be all that easy, either.

This, of course, has to do with the fact that, before we would "nuke" anything in Iran, we'd would need, in a very short period of time, to do the prep work. That means degrading command and control, eliminating coastal and inland defense systems including missile batteries and certain troop placements, along with severely compromising retaliatory offensive capabilities. It's in that last mode that we would need to seriously, and at a very high level of effectiveness, get rid of those Sunburns. A couple of surviving batteries would be sufficient to threaten any military naval assets we had in the Persian Gulf as well as anything we would have nearby in the Gulf of Oman.

I'll tell you this, Josh: if we lose a couple of big ships in the confrontation, Bush and his gang are going to become instantly about as popular as a skunk at a Baptist retirees' picnic. The slow drain of American dead in Iraq isn't the shocker that a whole ship and it crew complement would be, and there'd be Hell to pay for a loss like that, even though it wouldn't be as substantial as what we've had in Iraq.

I should also note in passing that the Sunburn actually isn't the worst of the recent-generation anti-ship missiles. South Korea (if I'm not mistaken) has one that's even faster and deadlier. The Chinese have been busting their butts to bring Sunburn up to that scale, but I don't think they're quite in the league yet.

Now, as far as the shift to the euro is concerned, my original contention in the article, "Currencies of War," still holds to the extent that the euro just isn't ready to handle the entire weight of the international community's financial contracts. That doesn't mean strides aren't being made. From what I understand, the game is afoot, and the Europeans aren't as averse now as they had been to absorbing a decent share of the burden. For them, it's a difficult period: they're not stupid enough to start openly advertising a switch-over for two reasons: first, they would never want to tip off the Americans that they're moving financial policy in this direction; and second, they certainly don't want the whole world—especially the entire oil-trading component of the financial world—to suddenly jump on the euro-denominating bandwagon.

Here's what it looks like to me: the European Union has taken a very intelligent approach to bringing new members—and most importantly, those new members' economies—into the EU fold: they take on a few at a time, laying on all kinds of requirements regarding everything from monetary policy discipline to financial transparency to acceptance of EU rules of law. Slowly, the EU pulls in more and more countries, building what is effectively a pan-European economy and, perhaps someday, a pan-European nation.

Think about that in the context of how they will intelligently allow the world's commodities markets to enter into a framework where the euro is the currency of choice for denomination. It looks to me like the European Union is staging a careful, orderly transition, several minor countries at a time to start with, then with more robust countries and their markets.

This slow, careful approach would allow the euro markets to adapt to the increased stress level a little bit at a time while the base of euros deepened; and it would also keep the Americans from reacting to some dramatic event. What Washington is seeing right now is nothing but a few marginal countries moving denomination of oil to euros, so it isn't all that worrisome. What Washington types don't see is that these are just the trickle in a stream that will ultimately, over the next five years or so, become a flood unless the dollar and the economic policies driving it turn direction really soon.

I also don't think Washington neo-cons see the subterfuge being played by some of our allies in the Middle East. The Saudis won't abandon the dollar for the time being, but they're not going to be stupid enough to maintain foreign reserves in a currency that's headed into the toilet. Those dollar reserves in Saudi Arabia represent the future of that country, especially the future of that country after the oil runs out. If the Saudis don't do something, they will enter the last part of this century with bupkis. That's a darned good reason for them to be laying their ground work right now to get out from under a valuation basis in a currency that's at risk of becoming severely eroded within the decade.

So you see, Josh, the question isn't exactly "when"; instead, this is going to be a process. At least to a certain extent, it will become noticeable only in retrospect. At any given point in time, things will look fairly normal with the exception of little financial news items here and there about this minor country (like Syria) or that irrelevant country (like Venezuela) switching over; the drama will happen—and mark my word, the news media will treat it like it's some unexpected, out-of-the-blue thing—when one of the big players swings over.

That would be Saudi Arabia or Nigeria.

But that won't happen for several years. At least it won't be apparent that it's happening for several years; and of course, by the time it hits the news, it will be too late for any economic policy or diplomatic intervention to mitigate the sea change.

Not that the Bush Administration has any ability whatsoever to suddenly start pursuing intelligent economic policy or rational diplomatic initiatives.


The Dark Wraith expects the Bush Administration's solution to have the word "attack" in it somewhere.

Wed May 17, 02:31:07 PM EDT