Special Analysis:
Yahoo! Accused of Providing China with Information to Jail Reporter
Yahoo! and other companies, including Microsoft, providing e-mail, search engine, and browser support add-ons have been accused in recent months of seeking access to the enormous Chinese market by acquiescing to censorship and other content restriction requirements of the Chinese government, which has recently become more aggressive in curtailing use of and access to the Internet and in censoring television and other broadcast media content that challenge state-mandated cultural values.
Yahoo! recently paid US$1 billion to acquire a 40% stake in Alibaba.com, which is China's largest online commerce company.
Pravda reports that Yahoo! has declined to comment on the allegations by Reporters without Borders because it has yet to fully review the report by the advocacy group.
Should those allegations against Yahoo! prove accurate, three recommendations are in order:
To be indifferent to the complicity of an American company in the imprisonment of a reporter of any country is to allow further challenges to and erosion of individual rights to privacy and freedom of the press worldwide. Ultimately, every journalist in the world is endangered by the actions of corporations that are willing to surrender the rights of individuals for profitable opportunities.
For bloggers to ignore this emerging threat is to stand willing to be victims one day of similar actions, which might occur not in a socially repressive, free-market country like China, but in a far closer but equally socially repressive, free-market country.
The Dark Wraith has spoken.
<< 7 Comments Total
dark one....i love your humourous posts!
expecting yahoo or microsoft to anything other than what is best for their shareholders is like the US people expecting to get value for their dollar from halliburton. ain't gonna happen.
its all about the money.
btw, the US corpmedia drowns out all dissenting voices. why expect journalism to thrive in china?
Good Morning Dark Wraith,
Hey Lenin's Ghost,
... expecting yahoo or microsoft to anything other than what is best for their shareholders...
...would be expecting them to act against their fiduciary responsibilities, and leave them open to be sued by those same shareholders, as Henry Ford was when he gave his employees enough in their wages to be able to afford one of his cars.
..... challenge came from the original investors, who wanted dividends. Henry Ford considered them non-producers. He preferred to reinvest the profits and do his own banking. The shareholders sued successfully. In 1919, Ford was ordered to pay $19 million in dividends. ...
http://tinyurl.com/bd6v9
Anyway, the multinational Corporations have bought the world, and all the politicians in it, with the possible exception of Bernie Sanders.
What else can we expect? I just am amazed that they allow the bloggers to continue to rant.
So much for the Tommy Friedman school of thought about McDonald's spreading freedom or something like that. Why that man has a job and a bestselling book, I will never understand.
Good morning, LA. It's good to have you hear.
I suspect that those who are supporters of the madness gain all the freedom they want by virtue of the wealth they acquire from glossing over the loss of freedom by others.
The Dark Wraith suspects his own book won't be finding much of a market in China.
[Nor will The Dark Wraith Forums be popping up on search engines in Beijing anytime soon.]
Good evening, Dark Wraith.
The Dark Wraith suspects his own book won't be finding much of a market in China.
What's the name of the book?
Does it contain the words: "democracy," "capitalism," "liberty" or "human rights"?
Scary article... but then, you do show us a lot of eye-opening, can't believe this crap is going on, type of stuff.
Thanks for that. Sometimes, we like to go through life unaware of what is going on around us. That's not a good thing to do. When something awful happens, it's one's own fault for not reading or keeping up with events.
thx for that, gypsy.
we have some actual green and socialist politicos up here that likely haven't been acquired by the 'corps' yet. damn commies anyway!;-)
As an aside, China's largest online commerce company is actually named Alibaba.com? As I'm sure most regulars here know (although perhaps not the general public) "Ali Baba" means "thief" in Arabic. Was this intended as a Marxist perspective of capitalism, or have the Chinese finally embraced what the neo-classical economists mean by "free market"? Hmm...