Special Analysis:
Pumpkins and Futures
Before we get started, keep in mind that this is a very basic introduction to what futures contracts are all about. A little bit of terminology is introduced, and the underlying purposes for futures markets are shown. Those intimately familiar with futures will find all kinds of oversimplifications in here and will have reason to sharply criticize the example used as being unrealistic. To those critics, I acknowledge the complaints, and in the spirit of fraternal comraderie I say, "Bite me."
Let's take that simplified tour of a few basics about futures contracts.
You are Henry Hineyswilt, and you are planning your traditional Halloween festival. You'll be needing a thousand pounds of pumpkins in about the third week of October. Now, it so happens that you know a guy named Lester Longsteam who will have more than enough pumpkins to fill your order. Right now, pumpkins are selling for 25¢ a pound. This is what we call the spot price of the pumpkins. You obviously don't need the pumpkins right away, so you would like to buy a forward contract: an agreement that specifies a price, quantity, and terms of delivery for some date in the future. Well, as it turns out, pumpkins are such a popular commodity that there is a standardized contract for them: there's an agreement for each month of the year; it states the number of pounds in a delivery and where the delivery is to take place. When a market is such that completely standardized forward contracts are available, we say there's a futures market, and the contracts are called futures. Everybody knows the terms of these agreements, and there's no need for buyers and sellers to meet face to face to hash out how much, where, and when. It's all there, laid out in these perfectly standardized, off-the-shelf agreements.
Okay, then, you've never dealt in futures for pumpkins before, so you look into it. You discover, much to your satisfaction, that a pumpkin futures contract for October is open, and each contract specifies delivery of a thousand pounds of pumpkins on the 15th of the month at the Farmers' Market just outside of Peoria. You figure this is going to work out perfectly. You tell Lester to go ahead and sign you up for a thousand pounds of pumpkins, and you get ready to give him a check for 25¢ per pound times 1000 pounds, or $250.00. Lester says to you, "No, Henry, I don't want to do a plain forward contract with you; I want you to go long one futures contract. I'll write (that is, 'I'll go short') a futures contract. We'll do this through the pumpkin futures clearinghouse because they deal in millions and millions of futures every day, and they guarantee payments and deliveries." You think this is a little strange, but you agree. Much to your surprise, when you buy the contract from your local pumpkin futures broker, Karl Korkburt, he tells you that you'll need to give him a check for $25, not $250! You ask him why you're not supposed to give him the whole amount, and he says, "Sir, all you pay on a futures contract is the margin, which in this case is 10%. You're not taking delivery now, so why would you pay the whole amount now?"
This makes sense to you, and you're about to tell him to go ahead, when he says, "Oh, wait a minute! My bad. I just quoted you the spot on pumpkins: that's going off at $250. Let me see what the futures prices are." You hear him clicking his keyboard, and then he says, "Okay, the September contract is going off at $230, and the October is going off at $190."
You find this odd, so you ask him to explain why these futures prices are less than the spot price. He says, "Well, first of all, money in the future isn't worth as much as money now. That's true for all instuments where money changes hands down the road instead of right away. But more importantly, traders by the millions are dealing in these pumpkin futures, and it is their judgment through their collective trading that there will be more pumpkins available in September, and lots more available in October. That means spot prices then should be lower than they are right now, when pumpkins are in pretty short supply."
Suddenly, it hits you: instead of paying the spot price to some producer for delivery in October, the futures contract allows you to pay what the market is currently assessing the price of those pumpkins will be in October, when you want delivery!
This is great, you figure. You authorize Karl to go long one pumpkin futures contract, and you give him the $19.00 (plus his commission, of course).
Well, the next day, Karl calls you and says you need to send him a check for some more money. You say, "I just sent you the $19 plus your commission, fool"; and he responds by saying, "Yes, but the October pumpkin futures contract is now trading at $180 (in other words, 18¢ per pound on the pumpkins). You say, "Yeah... so?" He gives an exasperated sigh and says, "You need to cover, Henry. Yesterday, you were holding a contract that obligated you to accept delivery of pumpkins at 19¢ per pound. Today, those October pumpkins are worth only 18¢ per pound. You've lost money: you had $19 margin with us; you lost $10 on the contract, so that puts you at $9; your margin on the new, $180 price is $18, so we need another $9."
This annoys you a little, and it doesn't exactly make sense; but then you say to him, "So, what would have happened if the price of the October futures contract had risen to $220?"
He answers, "Then your contract would have been worth more than you paid for it, so the gain would have gone into your cash account with us: you had the original $19 margin money, and you gained $30 on the contract; with a $220 price, your new margin would be $22; but with $49 in the account, you'd have $27 clear."
Ah, so this is how it works. You're making or losing money every day on the contract. Unlike stocks, bonds and other such financial investments where you don't actually realize gains and losses until you liquidate a security, futures trading means rising and falling real cash balances in your trading account every last day that your position is open. It strikes you that this means, if you're some kind of big-time trader in pumpkin futures, your net position could be whipsawing back and forth pretty seriously, so you'd have to have serious cash at the brokerage to cover in case the price went severely against your position.
You think you've got it all straight in your heart, and it's now the early part of October. The September contract has already expired, so October is the front-end contract. Everything is cool until you hear some awful news. The state in which you reside has just passed a law banning Halloween celebrations because they honor pagan religious beliefs contrary to the Judeo-Christian principles upon which this great nation was founded. If you were to go through with having that Halloween party, the maximum penalty would be $750 and death by burning at the stake. You call all your friends and tell them to forget about Halloween; you'll have some kind of Thanksgiving Day affair complete with proper and earnest prayers that the religious nuts all get zapped up to Heaven by Christmas so you won't have to buy them any presents. You also call the costume rental store and cancel your order for that Casablanca/Rocky Horror Picture Show combo outfit, and you kill the order at Sam-the-Spam-Man Catering. Problems solved.
Suddenly, something occurs to you: you have agreed to accept delivery of one thousand pounds of pumpkin pursuant to an open futures contract! You panic. You run around trying to figure out what to do.
Finally, you call that pumpkin broker, Karl Korkburt, from whom you bought the futures contract. He just starts laughing: "Sir, there's no reason for you to be acting like this. All you do is close the position." You ask him how to do this, and he says, "You simply take exactly the same position on the opposite side." After he checks his open positions screen, he says, "I remember: you're long one contract. That means, to close your position, you need to write one contract."
You respond, "Now wait a minute, Karl. You're telling me that I am now going to agree to accept delivery of a thousand pounds of pumpkins, and at the same time I'm going to agree to deliver a thousand pounds of pumpkins. What a fiasco!"
Karl has about had it with you by this point. "No, you ignoramus. The clearinghouse will see that you're long one October contract and short one October contract, so your net position is flat. You're out of the game. You're done. It's over."
A little sheepish at knowing so little, you grunt, "I'm done if I just write a contract, now?"
"Yes sir. As long as it's the same one you're long," Karl answers, getting his cheesy good humor back.
"Oh, well, let's do that, then," you tell him. "And let me know what this is going to cost me."
The broker says, "Well, I see that, as of yesterday, the price was $220 on the front-end contract. You had $30 in your account. Today, it looks like the price is up to $225, so we're going to have you write an October at that price."
You get all kinds of curious. You say, "I went long at $190, and yesterday it closed at $220, and that means I've got $30 in cash right now. So what happens here?"
The broker says, "Well, you're holding a contract that was marked at $220 as of last night; and you're going to write one that will sell at $225. That means you're five bucks ahead for the day and for the termination of the position, so that five dollars will add to your $30, so you finished the game ahead with a net gain of $35."
You grumble, "God, this is complicated."
Karl chuckles and responds, "No, it's complicated only because you were thinking about it the wrong way all along. You see, Henry, you kept thinking that you owned a contract you bought back in August; but you really shouldn't have been thinking that way. What was really happening was that, at the end of every day, your position was being closed out, and your gain or loss was being calculated, and the real wins or losses were going into or coming out of your account. Unless you did something about itwhich you never did until this very minuteyour position was being re-opened at the new price the next morning exactly as that position had been configured when the market closed the day before!"
"Ah!" you roar. "That's why I'm making only five dollars today: my position opened this morning by me automatically, without my doing anything, purchasing an October contract at $220! And now, because the price has gone up to $225, I'm ahead five bucks for the day!"
"BINGO!" Karl crows. "Whatever happened to the price of the October contract in previous days was already settled in your account. That money's already been there."
And you chime in, "But what really happened was that hundreds of dollars was going in at night, and then hundreds of dollars was heading back out in the morning."
"Well, I wouldn't say 'hundreds of dollars,' Henry," your broker corrects. "You're a small-time player, and you were working with margins that weren't even a drop in the bucket."
Now, you get curious. "Tell me this, Karl: if I hadn't thought to call you to kill this open position, would I really have had a thousand pounds of pumpkins show up at the shipping yard in Peoria?"
"No," your broker answers, "the clearinghouse keeps that from happening. Even though you were using futures to hedgemeaning that you were one of those types who actually had pumpkins or wanted pumpkins and were using contracts to guarantee a future delivery priceyour position would have automatically and permanently closed on the closing date of the October contract, and you would have to have purchased the actual pumpkins, themselves, in the spot market with the proceeds from the liquidation of your futures portfolio for October. If you think about it, once the October contract has reached its end on the last day of trading before deliveries specified in the contract, the position couldn't be opened again the next morning because the October contract would no longer exist."
"I see," you ponder. "But I just got the impression from something you just said that there are people who do this who aren't really trying to buy and sell pumpkins."
"That's right, Henry," the broker agrees. "We call them speculators; they play these markets for pumpkins, for oil, for hog bellies, for currencies, for interest rates, and for all kinds of other things just to try to make money from day to day."
You kind of laugh and mumble, "Those speculators aren't trying to control risk; they're actually taking risk!"
"You're exactly right!" Karl hollers. "Hedgers are simply establishing a known price they'll end up paying out in the future. They're not interested in winning or losing on price swings. If you'd actually had to buy those pumpkins you were planning to, you would have ended up paying the $225 spot for them at a farmers' market. The futures contract made you some extra money that would have then gotten eaten up when you went and bought the commodity. Speculators aren't playing the game to hedge risk of real products they're buying or selling; they're just trying to make a buck off the price swings."
"So they're like parasites," you declare.
"Absolutely not, Henry," your broker protests. "They are critical to the price discovery function of the market for a commodity. They're doing research, analyzing trends, studying patterns, and pounding out real leg work on the underlying commodities; so their buying and selling pressures on the prices are just adding more critically important information that helps the prices of those futures contracts reflect the best possible overall market assessments of future pricing conditions."
"Yeah, whatever," you grunt. "They've got more guts than I have. The way those futures contracts can make your net account position swing back and forth from positive to negative every day is enough to give a person a stroke. I can't imagine doing that with hundreds of open contracts every day."
"Well, some people can handle that, Henry, but I'll tell you this: futures are no place for beginners to start their careers; but they've sure been the place where a lot of folks have gotten their careers ended."
And with that, you bid farewell to Karl, hang up the phone, and thank your lucky stars that your days as a futures trader are over. Now all you have to worry about in this world is having the state authorities find out that you had been actively planning a pagan ritual. Just be glad that you didn't actually go through with the Halloween party. Being burned at the stake is almost as bad as being burned by futures trading.
The Dark Wraith has spoken.
<< 24 Comments Total
This is Henry Hineyswilt. Karl Korkburt, I'm still confused so, just fork over the damn pumpkins. I'll make pumpkin pies for everyone for Christmas presents and they'd better well like 'em!
Stupid state and it's stupid Halloween bans.
Oh, yeah, I borrowed this person's ID so I could log in. I hope no one minds.
This post has been removed by the author.
Good evening, Dark Wraith.
How long did it take you to write this "Pumpkins and Futures Analysis"?
It was fun to read, even if "speculation" and "futures" are still a bit confusing. However, this does help my understanding of the concepts involved.
Are "hog bellies" the same thing as "pork bellies"?
Good evening, Old White Lady.
It takes awhile for this kind of stuff to sort of work its way in. I had originally written this Analysis at a much more precise and technical level. That version got even me confused. I decided to dump most of the math from this round; so trust me, this one really is a little better.
The Dark Wraith tries to figure out what his position is at the end of trading in weird posts.
Good evening, Peter of Lone Tree.
Yes, pork bellies are the same as hog bellies.
Now watch some futures trader post a comment telling me they're not. I've always used the term "hog bellies," but I do notice that "pork bellies" is a more common term, especially these days.
The Dark Wraith usually avoids trading in the undersides of animals that eat more than he does.
great post, dark one! learning is such fun......time to get out the nest egg. lol
next time make it apples.....i realy like apple pie.:)
Good evening, Lenin's Ghost.
The futures market for apples is really tricky because you can't analyze it in isolation. You have to parallel the apple futures portfolio with a complementary position in vanilla ice cream.
That or caramel swirl ice cream. (The cinnamon ice cream afflicts me of a strange and deeply offensive case of the Wind.)
One way or the other, though, if you fail to incorporate the pricing dynamics of the topping that has to go on the hot apple pie right out of the oven, you'll miss some of the crucial factors driving price volatility.
You'll also miss the best part of the taste treat sensation.
Remember, Lenin's Ghost: ignore the crucial parameters in portfolio control analysis at your own peril.
The Dark Wraith lays on another scoop.
Dark Wraith, you have somehow interested me in the subject of futures trading by introducing the bait of pumpkins and Halloween. And you made me laugh. I'm blown away. (And a little less ignorant about the futures market. But not by much.)
Fascinating DW, I had no idea an account which flucuates daily was involved. My simplistic take on it was you were betting what the future price would be and hoping you were right! Amazing! But think I'll stick with penny ante poker!
Good afternoon, elf. Your comment about penny ante poker reminds me of one financial management class I taught several years ago. We had gone through a real-time simulation of holding a portfolio of futures to hedge currency exchange rate risk for an exporter. Once we had completed the basic exercise, I took the students back through the numbers just to point out how wild the ride would have been for a relatively small-time, pure speculator playing the same futures over the same period of time. One of the students—by his looks and demeanor something of an oafish frat boy sort, but actually a very bright young man underneath the façade—commented something to the effect that it was sort of like strip poker because you could end up losing your shirt and quite a bit more. I responded that, unlike strip poker, where the worst you can lose is your dignity, in futures trading you can lose those parts that make dignity something to worry about.
The class was quite rowdy for the remainder of that period.
The Dark Wraith usually strives for greater decorum.
Good afternoon, Andi.
Something I could do over on The Dark Wraith Forums Message Board is set up a futures position in some commodity to show how the real-world dynamics would play out as futures prices moved from day to day. One downside in so doing is that using simulated money doesn't quite convey the excitement the way real money does.
I wonder if George Soros would throw us some real dough so we'd have a better sense of the true thrills. Heck, I'd even run a thank you to him on the streaming news wire over there.
The Dark Wraith will have to look into the possibility.
oh. that is confusing. and that's the SIMPLE version?
so. can we assume that gas prices are going up? is there some arcane formula relating gas prices to oil futures? it is so considerate of the parasi...um, investors, to help determine future prices.
Dark Wraith, thanks for that article about Futures. Also I'm off at the end of the Month to Canada so if I disappear for a bit its because my computer hasn't been shipped up to me yet. But I'll let everyone here know when I have arrived in Vancouver around the first of September.
-Gary A
I am shocked....shocked! to discover that you use such foul language as "Bite Me" on your blog. How foul. How hilariously funny.
dark one.....i never ruin my delicious apple pie with toppings, may enjoy some black tea with pie. i DO use a lot of cinnamon in my apple pie. i'll try to remember not to bring one out when the red jeep pulls up.;)
Good evening, Guy Andrew Hall.
Yes, I have fallen from grace. I fear that the editors of Blogging Rectitude Quarterly will cancel my charter subscription if I fail to bring myself into compliance in a timely manner.
The Dark Wraith strives for redemption.
Good evening, Lenin's Ghost. Yes, apple pie must have cinnamon in it. I'm not big on the use of nutmeg in the pie, however, although some recipes insist upon this spice.
One way or the other, though, a visit without apple pie on the menu would simply mean we'd have to go to a local restaurant to find some. The problem is that most restaurants just can't make a good-tasting apple pie. I think it's some kind of rule: restaurants aren't allowed to make desserts as tasty as the home-made kind.
The Dark Wraith always makes the best desserts late at night, too.
Mornin' Dark One.
I tried "real hard" to understand. Really I did. But as you know by now, us Mulegirls are a tad thick-headed. But thank you for trying to help. I think I'll just stay debt free and keep growing my own pumpkins for the time being.
The elite like to keep us stupid and lol how I like to obilge. But you, dear heart are different. Thank you. May all your dreams come true.
I haven't read this posting yet (intend to when opportunity presents itself), but this was in today's Boston Globe "Business" section, and I thought it might be appropriate to add to the thread.
- oddjob
Good afternoon, Dark Wraith.
The Dark Wraith tries to figure out what his position is at the end of trading in weird posts.
What weird posts are you talking about? I know when you have to build fences, posts are always handy. Trading in posts (whether weird or not) could possibly be lucrative?
EGTY????
WTF?
is this a dark one jest?
something to do with futures?
Good afternoon. The post immediately before this one is been deleted. Information regarding the source has been harvested.
The Dark Wraith will deal with the matter prejudicially.
Hiya Dark Wraith.
Now, that last comment is quite the weird one. It might have been interesting to read what was deleted... and then, again, it might not.
Having had to delete a couple, lately, on my own blog, I have to say that I like the way you write about the deletion, harvesting the source, and dealing with the matter. I'll have to remember that.