Saturday, July 16, 2005

Government Claims Retail and Wholesale Inflation Dead, Economy Rolling

The Bureau of Labor Statistics late this week released data for inflation at both the producer and consumer levels indicating that inflation is not only under control, but non-existent. On Thursday, the BLS released the Consumer Price Index for June, showing that seasonally adjusted inflation at the retail level was zero. On Friday, the BLS released the Producer Price Index for June, showing that inflation at the wholesale level was zero. Excluding food and energy, consumer prices rose a modest one tenth of a percent for June, and producer prices actually fell by a tenth of a percent during the month.

These results surprised some economists and other outside observers who had seen anecdotal evidence of continuing upward momentum in prices at least at the retail level. The mystery was further deepened because the BLS report showed that the core inflation rate for consumers was only neglibly different from the rate that includes price changes for energy and food. That would mean the Bureau had found no inflationary pressures pushing up the costs of products ranging from meat and produce to gasoline and deisel fuel, even though it appeared to consumers as if such prices were marching ever higher as the Summer began. The Bureau had previously reported that prices in May had actually fallen by six-tenths of a percent; as such, the government's data points to a two-month period in which the economy was experience deflation, a situation entirely at odds with the Federal Reserve Board's continuing pursuit—at least in its stated policy—of combatting persistent, underlying inflationary pressures in the U.S. economy.

In other news, the Federal Reserve reported on Friday, in its monthly Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization Release, that industrial production roared upward in June by nine-tenths of a percent, led by increased output by utility companies due to warmer-than-usual weather. However, even excluding this somewhat anomalous push, overall production jumped by a surprisingly healthy four-tenths of a percent. The capacity utilizing rate reached exactly 80 percent, beating the concensus projection that the nation's factories would use 79.6 percent of capacity for the month.
Excess money can, in the short run, cause an economy to increase real output, but in the long run, output reverts to previous levels while prices rise to reflect the lesser value of the larger money supply in circulation.
  The Bureau of Labor Statistics' claims that inflation was non-existent in June notwithstanding, the unanticipatedly strong pace of industrial activity has some economists worried that the underlying cause can be traced back to a return to expansionary monetary policy by the Federal Reserve inducing short-term real output increases that will later wither into a burst of inflation. Even though the Federal Reserve had previously declared that it had abandoned the "accommodative" monetary policy that had allowed the Bush Administration and its Congressional allies to cut taxes while prosecuting two wars, recent evidence from data and the Fed's own statements seem to indicate that,
The Federal Reserve periodically declares its target for the federal funds rate; but in practical terms, it allows the rate to vary from this declared target.
  despite a record string of declared increases in the discount rate, the central bank is nevertheless expanding the money supply in a manner that could be interpreted as propping up an economy that would otherwise be showing signs of recessionary pressures. In its June 30 Press Release, the Federal Open Market Committee, while announcing another quarter-point bump upward in the federal funds rate, also stated, "[T]he stance of monetary policy remains accommodative and, coupled with robust underlying growth in productivity, is providing ongoing support to economic activity." The question on some economists' minds is whether this return to expansionary monetary policy is supporting the 'robust' growth of the economy, or in fact creating it.

Data released over the past couple of weeks, together with stong performances by the stock markets, definitely indicate that the economy is picking up steam going into the deep part of Summer. With oil prices now well entrenched in the $60 per barrel range, the problem for economists boils down to one of how an economy that, just months ago, was showing weaknesses in employment, stocks, and retail sales, could have managed such a dramatic turnaround. While some would argue that the true viability of neo-conservative economic policies is at the heart of this near-miracle, a few outside observers are wondering how much of this is the genius of Bush Administration politics and economics versus how much is an old-fashioned magic show of creative government data management coupled with greenback printing presses working overtime.

<< 18 Comments Total
 SB Gypsy blogged...

Good Afternoon Dark Wraith,

Maybe they should call it the "BS report" instead..

Sat Jul 16, 02:15:16 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, SB Gypsy. The problem there is that no one would know which department of the government we were talking about.



The Dark Wraith might suggest BS1, BS2, BS3,... and on to infinity.

Sat Jul 16, 05:00:17 PM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Good evening, Dark Wraith.
I vote for, "old-fashioned magic show of creative government data management coupled with greenback printing presses working overtime".
Miracles are hard to believe in!

Sat Jul 16, 11:05:31 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Old White Lady.

Considering the credentials of Mr. Bush, either his ascendance to the Presidency of the United States is a miracle, or the universe is owned by a landlord with a troubling sense of humor.


Either way, the Dark Wraith needs to finish building that bunker he's been talking about.

Sun Jul 17, 12:53:12 AM EDT  
 Wild Clover blogged...

When I see prices rising at the store I work at, in addition to gasoline uber-hikes, all I can figure is either they are putting on a grand magic show, or the stuff they calculate into their equations has no relationship to what I actually buy.

Now, here's a question for you...
if taxes on an item change, is it figured into the cost of living? Ciggie taxes just went up, though (non-prepared) food went down here in VA. Personally, I have a problem with single chilled 20 oz. sodas getting the grocery rate, while fountain drinks go for the higher rate, plus the local restaurant tax. A slim Jim is at 2% while the packaged sandwiches in the fridge go for 10%. So I may decide to do a slim Jim and a pack of nabs for lunch, rather than an erzatz burger and save $.08. Ranks up with the question that's always bugged me-WTF can you purchase soda and truly junky junk food with food stamps? Of course, the one brief period we qualified for them I tended to use them for things like steak and lamb as well as staple food stuffs.

Ah well, I can't wait for the revised version of these figures to come out-quietly some Friday....

Sun Jul 17, 02:08:28 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Wild Clover.

Your question about whether or not tax changes are included in CPI calculations is the very same one asked of me by a student a couple of years ago. My Heavens, Wild Clover, I stood there with a completely uncharacteristic look of "Uh..." on my puss trying to search my neural databases for an answer. I honestly didn't know, and the question had never occurred to me.

After some wild digging, I found the definitive answer: maybe. Sales and excise taxes are included, but taxes that are not specific to a good or service are not included. Hence, the tax on cigarettes would be incorporated, but an increase in your local income tax would not be.

Keep in mind, though, that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is using statistical methods to manipulate the raw data to remove the part of price increases that reflect improvements in "value"; and it is also reducing price increases on the assumption that people will buy less of products when their prices go up, thereby blunting the effects of the actual price increase.

Smell a rat, yet, Wild Clover? That consumer price index isn't measuring what you see happening at the store; it's measuring what the government says you'd really be seeing if you could see things the way the enlightened government people see them.


The Dark Wraith is seeing a whole lot of smoke just before it gets blown up our collective backsides.

Sun Jul 17, 02:48:15 AM EDT  
 Missouri Mule blogged...

Mornin' Dark One,

People are dazzled by superficial style and slick presentation, like those naive investors who bought silver only to find the entire commodity market had been manipulated. Our notorious saving-and-loan fiascoes and their perpetrators could easily have been identified long before the scandals surfaced.
If the missions of government regulatory institutions were realigned to support the fulfillment of human needs, rather than mounting moralistic, black-and-white campaigns to stamp out "social problems," wouldn't these institutions become powerful forces for human betterment?

Mon Jul 18, 08:33:20 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

IF THINGS ARE SO FREAKIN' DUCKY THEN WHY HAS THE STOCK MARKET DONE NOTHING BUT GO SIDEWAYS FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS (APPROX.)???

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!

- oddjob

(whose retirement $$ is in index funds)

Mon Jul 18, 09:02:06 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, Missouri Mule.

You are making what I consider a truly important point about the institutional rigidity that pervades our system of bureaucracies.

The very idea of nuance has been slipping away over the years, but its source is not modern. Ever since the Age of Enlightenment, there has been a drive to construct the institutions of men as the instituted versions of their machines: as God is a clockmaker, so too can we build clocks, not merely for our mantles, but also for our civilization.

It is, of course, important that we understand and abide laws of mathematics and physics, but to imagine that such chain-like, deterministic manners must pervade and ultimately overcome our government, our society, and our laws is the road to eventual ruin. That old Aristotelian "law of the excluded middle," when applied to how the government deals with the enormously complex world of its citizenry and their society, specifically and manifestly sets aside so many solutions and so much broad and subtle perspective.

I criticize progressives as well as conservatives for demanding that the government be black and white, but my greatest excoriations go to Right, these days, for having polarized debate so much and for thereby driving an appalling number of liberally educated people to respond in kind by choosing, for their own perspectives, narrow and brutish single-mindedness.

I am writing this as I labor over whether to publish at some point today an Analysis that attempts to deconstruct and derail a black-and-white approach to a specific mindset on an issue that is currently pervading progressive blogs. If I speak my peace, I shall be seen a traitor to some cause that I see as peripheral. I have already had a taste of the backlash—albeit only obliquely, since no one is yet prepared to openly call me a fool or worse—on this issue several times over the past week or so.

The polarization that now pervades our institutions is, in my judgment, a mere reflection of the chronic debates of our time that have all degenerated to yes-or-no, this-or-that, right-or-wrong, guilty-or-not-guilty, true-or-false, win-or-lose. To stand in opposition to that way of seeing the world ensures not only that I shall be permanently excluded from institutional solutions to the problems of modernity, but also that I shall be marginalized in the on-going debates of importance to our very future as a nation.


The Dark Wraith, then, must soon determine what road he will choose to irrelevance.

Mon Jul 18, 09:39:52 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, OddJob.

Oh, you noticed the sideways stock market that is the final and apparently unadoring judge of the neo-conservative economic policy juggernaut.

Huh. It must be yet another example of that "irrational" side Mr. Greenspan has claimed can overcome the stock markets. As such, just as he used contractionary monetary policy to try to kill the boom of the 1990s, evidence is mounting that he's renewed his passionate, albeit rather furtive, campaign to use expansionary monetary policy to prop up the economic failure that is the Bush Administration.


In this light, then, the Dark Wraith sees our Federal Reserve Chairman as being, if nothing else, consistent in his enduring scorn for what the stock market would want to do if left alone.

Mon Jul 18, 09:45:46 AM EDT  
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

The following statements by his lordship bring to mind the Wraith's comments about the "inverted yield curve":
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Monday flat long-term interest rates, despite the Fed's raising of short-term rates, should not be interpreted as a clear sign of economic weakness.

"A sharp flattening of the yield curve is not a foolproof indicator of economic weakness," Greenspan said in a written response to questions by the chairman of Congress' Joint Economic committee, Jim Saxton, a New Jersey Republican.

"He said that most statistical models that look at the yield curve -- different interest rates along the spectrum of Treasury debt maturities -- to forecast economic trends project moderate growth".
The entire article can be accessed at http://tinyurl.com/862nl

Did the Wraith not say some weeks ago that (five of the last six?) sharp recessions have been preceded by inverted yield curves?

Mon Jul 18, 03:58:46 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Five of the last five, actually, Peter.


The Dark Wraith suspects a relationship, difficult to discern though it may be to Mr. Greenspan.

Mon Jul 18, 04:51:20 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Is he really that dopey, or is he just another mendacious wingnut hack, but one who bears a more professorial mien and speaks in more measured tones?

(And yes, I know he was quite the favorite of Ms. Rand back in the day, so I can kind of guess what your answer will be. I still felt like asking...)

- oddjob

Mon Jul 18, 05:01:15 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

OddJob, for God's sake, man, you're holding up a picture of a rabbit to a panther who really, really, really favors bunnymeat, and you're saying, "Does kitty likey?"



The Dark Wraith wonders if he could lunge without removing OddJob's arm during the kill.

Mon Jul 18, 06:16:00 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

LOL!

- oddjob

Mon Jul 18, 07:33:06 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

The Government lies to us.

Just another reason why I feel the United States is in The Twilight of Our Civilization
Scadapaly

Tue Jul 19, 04:14:57 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

This is a five year old New Yorker cartoon, DW, but I thought of you right away when I saw it.

- oddjob

Thu Jul 21, 10:01:13 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good Heavens, OddJob, I thought I was familiar with just about every economics cartoon from recent years of The New Yorker, but I have no memory whatsoever of that one. It is just priceless.


The Dark Wraith needs to get that cartoon framed for his mantle.

Sat Jul 23, 01:50:52 AM EDT