Tuesday, April 12, 2005

U.S. Trade Deficit Hits Record... Again

The Commerce Department reported this morning that the U.S. trade deficit has hit yet another record high, despite the weakness of the U.S. dollar that should be making foreign imports more expensive here and U.S. exports cheaper overseas.
The difference between the value of a nation's exports of goods and services and its imports of goods and services is roughly its "current account." If more money flows out through domestic purchases of imports than comes in through foreign purchases of exports, the country runs a "trade deficit."
  Some observers have accused the Bush Administration of ignoring the weakness of the greenback in the hopes that a boost in domestic export industries would help the American economy at a time when other sectors have been showing weaknesses because of rising interest rates and costs of energy. Today's figures show that the plan isn't working: the trade gap in February rose to more than $61.0 billion, about $2.5 billion worse than the revised January red-ink figure. Analysts had projected a more modest increase in the trade deficit, once again indicating that certain forecasters continue to believe that the U.S. economy is faring better than it actually is in many sectors.

The driving factor behind the trade deficit in February was the skyrocketing cost of imported oil. Even though less oil by volume was purchased in February, the increase in price per barrel overwhelmed the decline in quantity demanded.
A country maintains an artificially low exchange rate of its currency for another by continuously entering currency markets to purchase the target currency with its own. Demand for the target currency is artificially strong, causing its value to rise, and supply of the pegging currency is unusually large, causing its value to sink.
  But even though OPEC got its share of the record number of dollars pouring out of the United States, imports from China continued to be responsible for the largest single magnet for greenbacks heading across the border. Although the U.S. trade deficit with China narrowed somewhat, at almost $14 billion in the red, it still ran well more than twice the $6.3 billion trade deficit the U.S. ran in February with the entirety of OPEC.

This is sure to add fuel to the continuing complaints in some circles that China's long-standing policy of maintaining an artificially low exchange rate of yuan for dollars has been the real culprit behind American trade deficits all along.
The Chinese manage to maintain an exchange rate of 8 yuan to the dollar. By some estimates, the "unpegged" exchange rate might be closer to 2.5 yuan to the dollar.
  Others would argue that, were China not pursuing its global markets-distorting fixed exchange rate policy, exchange rates of other countries would merely adjust to maintain the same overall pattern of global flows of greenbacks and the goods that are sold for them. The federal government of the United States—as well as other governmental authorities and private parties—needs to borrow massive amounts of money to finance operations, so a ready source of dollars for such lending activity must exist. The argument goes that, in the absence of adequate pools of lendable savings within the U.S., exchange rates will adjust so that greenbacks are in the hands of foreigners who can then lend money to U.S. borrowers, by far the largest of which is the federal government, which has run a string of huge budget deficits during the Bush Administration.

By enacting a series of tax cuts that starved the federal government of operating revenues, and by coupling this with aggressive and rising expenditures on certain programs favored by the political party that controls the entire government, the Bush Administration has put the nation in the position of being an enormous and continuing source of demand for borrowed money, the majority of which has been provided by foreigners who gather the dollars to make those loans by selling their merchandise in the United States. Effectively, then, exchange rates tend to become positioned so that those willing to lend money get the dollars to do so, and those needing the loans get their money, along with a cheap, imported toaster.

<< 12 Comments Total
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

Play "Devil's Advocate" for a few moments and explain if you can any benefits to be derived from the current policy.

Tue Apr 12, 10:47:17 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Oh, that's easy, Peter of Lone Tree.

We get to shop at Walmart and buy decent-quality goods at everyday-low-low prices.

Essentially, this exchange rate regime in which we now find ourselves allows us to save money in the Bank of Hong Kong, which then lends it to our government. In lieu of earning interest on our savings accounts, we get cheap merchandise.

Pretty cool how global markets work, don't you think?


The Dark Wraith admittedly finds "cool" in rather arcane stuff.

Tue Apr 12, 11:03:09 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

You mean besides the outlandish spending they get to do on whatever the hell they want while their office, knowing it will be up to others to adjust to the consequences?

To me now it looks like nothing so much as those endless tales of European monarchs raising armies and always hunting for a new source of cash with which to fund the next military adventure, only in this case the new source of cash is a rival/potential enemy who more than benefits since they become the banker, and therefore ultimately become the ones capable of deciding what the rules of engagement will be. They can overdo that to their detriment since once they acquire enough dollars they won't be in a position to trash them without hurting themselves very badly, nonetheless....

- oddjob

Tue Apr 12, 11:05:18 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

(... while they're in office?)

(Sorry 'bout that.)

Tue Apr 12, 11:06:34 AM EDT  
 PoliShifter blogged...

I appreciate your insight dark Wraith though admitedly a lot of it goes over my head, I think I can grasp some of the central tenets.

My main fear is this: It seems to me the NeoCons are trying to take over the world by intruding into global markets at the sacrafice of the United States.

The NeoCons to dominate a global economy and they want to be the global policmen. To that end, they could care less what happens to the United States and its citizens in my not so humble opinion.

They (The NeoCon Jobs)further twist their logic by telling everyone what they are doing is "good" because they are spreading free markets and democracy throughout the world AND they are lifing the standard of living for countries such as India and China.

Meanwhile the U.S. Economy continues to decline, jobs evaporate, real income stagnates, all the while inflation looms.

But fear not, Bush is trying to get an amnisty program for migrant workers in form of a guest worker program. Bush's logic? He thinks Americans dont want to do "those types of jobs" that the migrant workers will do.

That was fine when it was about picking tomatos in the hot sun for $2 an hour....Yeah, most of us dont want to do that.

But what about construction, drywall, painting, autorepair, landscaping, food service, etc...Americans dont want those jobs Mr. Bush? And why not BECAUSE THE PAY IS BELOW A LIVING WAGE!! Why? BECAUSE OF THE HUGE INFLUX OF WORKERS WILLING TO WORK FOR LESS THAN A LIVING WAGE!!

Where is all that extra money flowing?? In to the hands of the business men who make more profits by hiring cheap labor.

In the end this is going to crush us. Who will have the money to buy the cheap goods and services these guys are producing for "our" benefit? No one.

But the Radical Neo Conservatives (RNC) think they are holier-than -thow doing it for "the good of the world" as they boot strap India, China, Mexico, and other nations to standards of living similar to that in the U.S.

Really, what is happening is that our standard of living is being brought way down in order to move the standard of living up just a little in other nations.

It is done under the guise of being for "the greater good" but it is really about making money.

Corporations have no loyalty to the United States any more. They are global. Further, corporations control our government through lobbyist groups.

The Corporations will bury the United States so they can make a profit in India and China while our government stands by with their hand out to their lobbyists.

Sorry to rant.....It's one of those days......Dark Wraith you have a way of bringing it out of me...

Tue Apr 12, 02:10:03 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

That is what happens in an ownership society. Only the owners matter. Therefore it logically follows that only the owners benefit, no?

Welcome to Karl Rove's nirvana, the return of William McKinley's Gilded Age.

- oddjob

Tue Apr 12, 03:49:18 PM EDT  
 Rook blogged...

Totally off topic Dark Wraith, but you've been tagged.

Tue Apr 12, 08:01:50 PM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Guess what? Tax day is 2 days away.

Thu Apr 14, 12:10:17 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Old White Lady.

And once again I will owe the IRS money.

I had thought half seriously about asking the feds if they would considering talking to their Chinese financiers about covering my tab for me.

Just last week at Walmart, I bought a made-in-China floor lamp for $8.97. It seems to me that the Chinese might pay my tax bill just to maintain favor with me, considering how I'm making their nation wealthier with every purchase I make like that.

Yeah, I think I'll just put a note in with my tax return:

Dear Sir or Madame:

Please note that I owe you big-time. I understand that, if I don't pay up, you'll make me some hard-timer's old lady at a federal correctional facility.

Because I don't want to be some hard-timer's old lady at a federal correctional facility, I am herewith asking you to see if one of those Chinese who goes to the U.S. Treasury auctions to buy your Treasury bonds would consider hooking me up with enough money to pay the bill I owe you.

Please tell the Chinese that I am a big fan of their merchandise. Last week, I bought a torchier lamp. It's pretty nice, although it had a short in the wiring, so the first time I turned it on, I got my stool softened. I fixed the short, though, mostly because I don't need my stool softened all that often.

Anyway, just tell them to give you the money I owe you guys, and we'll call it even.

Ever appreciatively yours,
The Dark Wraith
...



The Dark Wraith thinks the IRS will go for this idea.

Thu Apr 14, 01:32:01 AM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

Dark Wraith, I wish you luck with that idea. It is a good one.

Thu Apr 14, 03:16:15 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Well, well, well, guess what I'm listening to on NPR's All Things Considered right now?

The international implications of the sinking dollar and the US deficit it funded by those implications!

- oddjob

Thu Apr 14, 05:25:05 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, OddJob.

I don't suppose National Public Radio folks mentioned that The Dark Wraith Forums has been beating on this subject over and over again for months, did they?

Huh. Didn't think so.

That's the Blogosphere for ya: nothing worthy of the real news ever comes up out here in cyberspace.


The Dark Wraith snorts once; snorts twice; and finishes the snortfest with a violent round of indignant flatulence.

Thu Apr 14, 05:32:44 PM EDT