Thursday, April 28, 2005

GDP Growth Slides with Worse News Behind the Numbers

The Commerce Department Thursday morning released its estimate of growth of the U.S. economy, and the numbers showed that growth slowing even more than forecasters had predicted. For the period from January through March of this year, the gross domestic product—a standard measure of the total value of the economy's output of goods and services—grew by 3.1%, down from fourth quarter, 2004, GDP growth of 3.9%, and below the first quarter growth of 3.5% expected in a concensus forecast by select economists. Coupled with rising prices throughout the economy, real GDP growth is eroding strongly, giving evidence of waning business and consumer activity in the face of rising domestic interest rates and the increasing burden that steep energy prices are placing on budgets.

Perhaps more troubling than the lower growth of GDP was the less-noticed reason for much of what growth there was: business inventories in the period rose on weakening consumer expenditures, meaning that companies must eventually cut back production to clear their shelves of the growing stockpiles.
In recent years, businesses have been able to maintain lower inventories at any given point in time through computerized inventory management and shorter order-to-production cycles.
  Typically, businesses slow production by employing fewer workers and by ordering lower levels of intermediate goods and services upstream in the production chain. Businesses slow production by employing fewer workers; but this will mean that households have less disposable income to clear those inventories that are building up, and this will induce further cutbacks in employment. Also, as producers of final goods and services reduce upstream orders, their suppliers will have to cut back their production, too, thus magnifying the problems in the labor market and, therefore, in consumer spending. With the official U.S. unemployment rate still above five percent, some economists state flatly that the labor pool can ill afford any further pull-back in the demand for workers.

With recessionary pressures looming, the desirable response would be for the federal government and the central bank to work together to foster an environment of lower interest rates to stimulate business investment and consumer spending. However, that cannot be done in this era. The federal government, already burdened with record budget deficits, has no room for higher levels of expenditures to stimulate the economy. Far worse, those budget deficits have put substantial upward pressure on interest rates as the Treasury sops up large quantities of funds available for lending.
Far worse than inflation, itself, is when the expectation of inflation sets in: the expectation starts showing up in rising prices, higher interest rates on consumer and business loans, and demands for sharper wage increases.
  As far as the central bank goes, it has no room to help, either. Because of what it glibly described as "accommodative" monetary policy during the first four years of the current Administration, far too much money was printed for tax cuts and war, and the result is the escalating inflationary pressures now seeping into the prices of goods and services. To cool the inflation before it becomes seriously embedded in business and consumer expectations, the Federal Reserve must pursue a tight monetary policy, with rising interest rates that will hamper growth. With both the federal government and the Federal Reserve unable—and, some would argue, ideologically unwilling—to enact counter-cyclical fiscal and monetary policies, the road ahead for the economy, as well as for the real, flesh-and-blood people in it, is not bright.

In other news, President Bush will appear tonight in a nationally televised news conference billed in part as his most significant opportunity yet to promote his plan to partially privatize the Social Security system by allowing workers to borrow money from the Social Security taxes withheld from them to invest in the stock and bond markets. No word has come out of Washington on what advice Mr. Bush will be providing to the millions of prospective new investors as the U.S. stock markets continue a slow, downward trend that has created negative nominal and real growth in broad-based stock market indices over the entirety of his Presidency. But even though average workers will be facing what could prove to be a challenging investment environment that will leave them impoverished in their retirement years, much excitement still exists over the far more important aspect of this plan, which is the $2 trillion jobs program it will create for the stockbrokering and banking industries, a jobs program that will be financed by the federal government and ultimately paid for by the citizens of the United States, in general, through higher global interest rates, and by the workers participating in the new system, in particular, through repayment of the funds they borrow from the government to invest, as well as through the brokerage and banking fees they will have to pay for the privilege of sacrificing defined benefits to achieve the neo-conservative vision of an ownership society.

<< 23 Comments Total
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

I'd be interested to know what the "unofficial" unemployment rate is.

Thu Apr 28, 11:45:42 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

This 'toon was published on 4/15 (appropriately), but have you seen it yet?

- oddjob

Thu Apr 28, 12:01:01 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Here's an MSM report on the same data (from the AP).

- oddjob

Thu Apr 28, 12:13:10 PM EDT  
 oldwhitelady blogged...

How to fix... how to fix...
I know! We need to start funnelling more money to Halliburton. Am I right? Isn't that the normal fix for everything?

Thu Apr 28, 01:53:02 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Old White Lady.

We can't give all of the money to Halliburton. Some of it has to be reserved for Bechtel.

Gracious.



The Dark Wraith allocates the dough.

Thu Apr 28, 02:11:53 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, OddJob. I really favor that two-panel cartoon. The one on the left side is such a perfect portrayal of the attitude of the wealthy in this country.

God forbid there should be anything that disturbs their otherwise blissful slumber.



The Dark Wraith wonders how they'll deal with a real downward correction in their stock market portfolios.
[They want WHAT?! A soft mattress at the bottom of the skyscraper from which they jump?]

Thu Apr 28, 02:15:21 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

And the one on the right is a perfect evocation of a terrific campaign issue.

So of course we'll never hear anyone running for office put it like that, will we?

- oddjob

Thu Apr 28, 02:40:49 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Not until the Democratic politicians git some o' them-thar two-taters things.



The Dark Wraith probably shouldn't have put it that way.

Thu Apr 28, 02:56:11 PM EDT  
 Auntie Roo blogged...

Good Evening All,

I wonder which of these scenarios this economic mess fits into:

a) It was seen as an acceptable risk of their policies.

b) It was an unforseen consequence.

c) It was what was intended to happen.

While all of these are troubling in their own way the last one is the most frightening to me. What would be the benefits (financial, ideological, or political) in causing this to happen?

Thu Apr 28, 08:16:15 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Auntie, I don't feel equipped to answer your question (DW should be able to do that nicely), but I do feel perhaps you've neglected to include one other choice, the one I believe most likely to be selected by Dear Leader:

d) What mess?

- oddjob

Thu Apr 28, 08:55:22 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Auntie Roo. First, thank you for joining the regular commenters here. (You are planning to stick around, I hope.)

Now, one of the oddities of the neo-conservative approach to politics is a striking willingness to openly display not just policy prescriptions, but also the objectives of those policies. Those who hold elected office do not go that far, of course; but the theoreticians seem almost glib in disclosing outcomes that are strikingly undesirable to many who would read about such scenarios of the future.

As I wanted to ask in a comment thread on my series, The 21st Century, why didn't the Pentagon go into full-scale denial or suppression when The Wall Street Journal spilled the beans about that highly detailed document laying out the global political, economic, and military landscapes to which the neo-cons and military hawks are aspiring for the decades ahead?

Their vision is highly disturbing. It does not comport with most people's desired world of this new Century, and it certainly poses grave concerns for even some Conservative lawmakers.

So why would the Pentagon let that document float... and maybe even have been instrumental in getting it to the right journalist for the widest possible audience?

Fearlessness. I honestly believe, Auntie Roo, that the neo-conservatives think they are unstoppable and that their designs are in that realm of logic where ideas are "true" because they flow from valid proofs not subject to disagreement by those who properly understand reason.

If that is the nature of the beast with which we are dealing, problems of the here-and-now—even catastrophes in our own time—are irrelevant.

This was how the old, Austrian-school, "Classical" economists saw things: the short-run doesn't matter; as long as the economy is on a long-term, secular growth path, the short-run business cycles don't matter, and it's certainly not the duty of government to interfere in the workings of the free market to institute counter-cyclical policy initiatives, since that interferes with pristine, darned-near physics-level forces of nature.

Of course, John Maynard Keynes said, "In the long run, we're all dead"; and a new era of economics and politicians came along that saw it not just as the duty of government to help in the short run, but almost a survival strategy to do so, lest the Communists (or even the Fascists) get a serious foothold among the workers of the nation.

But Classical economists had no problem with admitting that they didn't care about the short run, just as neo-conservatives seem to have no concern with the awful and dire consequences that will almost necessarily flow from their actions.

It is a disarming approach, and it could almost work, even up to the point where the majority of the Electorate gets sick to death of the misery that will come. To that end, I suppose the neo-cons will ultimately be glad to follow that old piece of advice: When the mob finally chases you out of town, get in front of them and act like it's a parade.

And make sure, of course, that everybody thinks you put a lot of planning into that parade, too.



The Dark Wraith prepares the shovels to be used behind them as they leave the city.

Thu Apr 28, 09:08:11 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, OddJob.

Your possible scenario is the one I call the "Alfred E. Newman" strategy: What! Me worry?



The Dark Wraith always did think there was something creepy about Mad Magazine.

Thu Apr 28, 09:11:01 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

The Dark Wraith always did think there was something creepy about Mad Magazine.

There is, of course, the resemblance between Master Newman and a certain Shrub.....

- oddjob

Thu Apr 28, 09:25:42 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

By the way, OddJob, did you notice the new blog I blogrolled over in the sidebar? The blog is called Zen Comix, and the host has some fun cartoons, not the least of which is some Zippy the Pinhead!


The Dark Wraith likes the strange and unusual (although he would never be strange and unusual in his own right, of course).

Fri Apr 29, 12:39:01 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

No, I had not noticed. Thank you! The one from 4/25/05 is particularly apt (& brutal).

- oddjob

(BTW, on the matter of comics I will be in perpetual mourning until such time (if ever) as Bill Watterson decides to resurrect Calvin & Hobbes.)

Fri Apr 29, 01:11:51 AM EDT  
 Auntie Roo blogged...

Fearlessness. I honestly believe, Auntie Roo, that the neo-conservatives think they are unstoppable and that their designs are in that realm of logic where ideas are "true" because they flow from valid proofs not subject to disagreement by those who properly understand reason.

Is this the same as the city slicker who, knowing that milk comes from cows, is positive that milking a bull will eventually produce milk, if he/she has faith & perseverance?

Fri Apr 29, 02:59:54 AM EDT  
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

Perhaps The Dark Wraith would do well to consider consulting with Auntie Roo when searching for poetic imagery to describe socio-politico-economic theories.

Fri Apr 29, 08:26:48 AM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, Auntie Roo.

The difference is that your average city slicker, upon getting the snot kicked out of him by the offended bull, will then leave cow milking to the farmers.

A neo-con, on the other hand, will declare that the snot so extracted from him is really milk, and proceed to sell it as dairy produce better than that sold by real farmers.


The Dark Wraith cries, "BULL!"

Fri Apr 29, 09:16:57 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

With all this talk about US Investment portfolios going boom. Now that I've sold my house and as part of saving some money what are some nice diversified international funds that I could invest in that might make a bit of money. Any good ideas from the Investing and Finance guru's out there.

I'm good with computers but managing money is something I'm still really learning about and getting in touch with.

-Gary A

Fri Apr 29, 09:26:33 AM EDT  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

Send your money to a thrifty individual who knows the value of money, such as Mr. Wraith. He'll establish a private account in your name. With his knowledge he can proceed to spend your money slower than you would, thereby saving you money.

It's called a GOP Grift Bank.

Fri Apr 29, 12:24:18 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

I see Mr. Goat's in an especially sardonic mood today! :-)

- oddjob

Fri Apr 29, 01:33:19 PM EDT  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Gary.

I have been getting a bit more serious about allowing a good financial service an advertising slot on blogScream. Although I've set aside a couple of prospective advertising opportunities, it seems to me that a decent, affordable place where people could get into international funds would be worth offering.

I don't know, yet. I'm still working on the ethical part of it. My years as a consultant have made me considerably more gunshy of commercial deals than is probably reasonable. I'll try to work something out by some time next week, so stay tuned.


And for God's sake, in the meantime, don't invest any of your money in BushCo. International.


The Dark Wraith doesn't want to see an investor get wiped out.

Fri Apr 29, 01:43:16 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

I wouldn't invest any in BushCo. anyhow. So staying away from T-Bills will be easy :).... No US government debt instruments for this man.

From a musical sense you could say that T-Bills were very out of tune instruments... I know people will want to come and find me for that one.

I look forward to whatever you have coming DW.

-Gary A

Fri Apr 29, 03:32:45 PM EDT