Thursday, March 31, 2005

Bulls Battle Back, Jobless Claims Jump

Stock prices finished strongly higher Wednesday as investors moved cash back into the market, gathering up what were perceived to be bargains in the wake of Tuesday's sell-off. The narrow and broader blue-chip indices rose better than one and a quarter percent, while the NASDAQ composite pushed up one and three-fifths percent to move back slightly to the north side of the 2000-point mark.
In general, the more volatile stock prices are, the greater the risk of investing in those kinds of securities.
  The heavy up-and-down see-saw of the market is making for more volatile than usual conditions, worrying some analysts, but cheering others who see more opportunities for gains both on upside and on downside movements. Although no single factor could explain yesterday's upward movement, the significant stock price movements might be no more than the norm for the markets right now, particularly if the volatility is indicating a market with more risk awaiting investors.

For a number of months, stock indices were stuck in a trading range, showing no trend either to higher or to lower levels. Beginning several weeks ago, however, a distinct trend downward began to emerge, evidenced well by the NASDAQ composite index finally making the passage to the underbelly of the 2000-point level, where it stayed until yesterday.
Although stock price volatility indicates more investment risk, only the non-diversifiable component of that risk is associated with greater expected returns.
  Arguably, what might be occurring now is a new trading range with a somewhat lower average than the previous one, but with this one marked by more variation from day to day in overall movements of the indices and the actual stocks that form them. Index swings on the order of three-quarters of a percent or more from day to day would be an indication that considerable volatility has become the norm, a situation that allows sophisticated investors to form short-term positions to gather quick gains.
"Going long" means buying stocks, betting that those stocks will go up in price. The opposite action is called "going short," which means forming short positions, betting that the stocks will fall in price.
  One result of this could be a self-fulfilling volatility: big investors going long to bet on one day's stock price rises could then sell off once they had hit a mark they wanted, but by closing their long positions, the sell-off knocks stock prices back down again. Played over and over again, this kind of trading pattern can make prices of individual stocks appear to have a see-saw, up-and-down behavior that is actually unrelated to underying, instrinsic value of the specific companies whose stocks are being traded in the strategy.

In other news, the Commerce Department this morning released the latest data on claims for first-time unemployment benefits, and the picture painted by the numbers was grim and wildly at odds with analysts' expectations. For the week ending March 26, first-time claims shot up to 350,000 from 330,000 in the week previous. Forecasters had predicted that claims would actually fall by 10,000 instead of rising by 20,000.
"Discouraged workers" are people who would otherwise be counted as part of the labor force, but they are not because they no longer "actively seek" gainful employment.
  At the same time, the number of workers who were still living on unemployment benefits fell to its lowest level since the beginning of the Bush Administration. Although the White House is likely to spin that number to tout a healthy jobs market, it is far more likely that most of the people who have been on unemployment benefits for an extended period of time have either exhausted their benefits or otherwise left the job market. As a result of this possible rise in the number of so-called "discouraged workers," the unemployment rate could drop in the coming months, even though more people are out of work.

<< 12 Comments Total
 Paradigm Shifter blogged...

Darkwraith,

Has anyone done any analysis yet on what effect online daytraders are having on the markets?

Volitility is great for traders and it seems to me more and more that hedge funds, mutual funds, and brokerage houses are trading and encouraging some of their clients to trade.

I see a conflict with Wall St on one hand wanting people to keep their money in the markets long term so they can play with, and on the other hand wanting people to trade so they can rack up commisions.

Ofcourse the fashionable thing these days seems to be to short the sh*t out of particular stocks (hedge funds with their short/covertible note schemes...a**holes!!)

Still the beggars and hangers on to the Dow Theory or unmployment numbers, job growth, computer chip sales, GDP growth, etc...all these economic geniuses are always scratching their heads when the market does not react the way they think it will...

IMO, there are legions of daytraders out there who would not dare keep their money in the markets overnight...who trade the "market expectations" both up AND down thus creating unexpected volitility...

But I have no data to back it up...it's just speculation on my part.

Thu Mar 31, 02:16:15 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

There was a TON of anecdotal day trader stuff out there by the end of the last boom under Clinton.

- oddjob

Thu Mar 31, 02:43:05 PM EST  
 Paradigm Shifter blogged...

thanks anonymous...I vaugely remember some of that...maybe that is where I am getting some of these kooky ideas...

On another OT note...
God Speed Teri!!

And get ready boys...HERE THEY COME!

HERE COMES CHENEY'S Nuclear Option!
(Carl, you are so predictable)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152095,00.html

GOP Goes on Judicial Offensive
Thursday, March 31, 2005
By Liza Porteus

Republicans, many of whom led the charge to focus federal attention on Terri Schiavo (search), are vowing to hold the judiciary system responsible for rulings in the case that some believe were tantamount to murder.

Thu Mar 31, 05:18:41 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

CNN.com is reporting that DeLay has hinted obliquely at looking into impeachment hearings over this....

- oddjob

Thu Mar 31, 06:35:54 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Don't ya just love how states rights are right only when it's for the Republicans?

DeLay's constituents should put him into a persistent vegetative state.

lowlyredstater

Thu Mar 31, 06:53:47 PM EST  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

DeLay is such a wuckfad. I used to get calls from his office a few years ago telling me the good representative wanted to recognize me as a business leader. Yeah, right, if I wanted to donate to the GOP. I used to just hang up, but of course that was before I was more refined in my political speech.

Now I just got a call from some senator seeking contributions, with the prize being some sort of dinner function with good old George W. himself.

I'm pissed though, as my assistant screened the call. I would much rather say something like:

What! Dinner with that ass? I'd rather be afflicted with a pica complex in a feedlot than have dinner with that assclown.

Of course they'll probably not call back to give me that chance.

Thu Mar 31, 07:40:12 PM EST  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

This post has been removed by the author.

Thu Mar 31, 07:42:55 PM EST  
 LindiBee blogged...

Regarding Delay's attempt to capitalize on the Terri Schiavo case, isn't that dangerous for him in light of the fact that, 17 years ago, DeLay and his family chose to pull the plug on his own comatose father. Check out the link
here
This was also covered on Democracy now Tuesday, where they also interviewed UK Guardian reporter Suzanne Goldenberg, who discovered that Terri Schiavo's father decided to turn off the life support system for his own 79 year old mother who was ill with pneumonia for just a week. If only the US media spent half the time covering the hypocrisy of the Schiavo Family Circus crowd as they spent tossing spurious accusations at her husband…..

Fri Apr 01, 03:07:27 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Oh, but Lindibee, they can't do that! I don't know where their received wisdom is coming from but according to this article yesterday (link from Eschaton), the MSM appears to have decided the nation is "divided" (ABC's term according to Americablog), and Newsweek says we're having a "furious debate".

82% of us think this is an obscene circus, so that means the country's "divided".

Right.

I smell a rat.

- oddjob

Fri Apr 01, 08:57:25 AM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good morning, LindiBee.

I never ceased to be stunned by how the mainstream media simply refuses to touch "background" issues in determining what is and is not legitimate "news." It is as if, once blessed to be part of the drum beat, the fundamental inconsistencies of a newsmaker's position no longer matter; everything hinges on the moment, and nothing will stop that moment from overwhelming reasoned discourse.

If you ask me, it's pretty sad when the only place you can find the whole story is in the Blogosphere, where you find way too many people running little Websites where they post articles that hardly anyone ever reads.

Wait a minute. Let me rephrase that...


The Dark Wraith needs to watch which way he swings his sword.

Fri Apr 01, 09:26:33 AM EST  
 Kat blogged...

Um... yeah... what he said.

And, I added you to my blog links. Thanks for coming by.

Fri Apr 01, 04:25:00 PM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, Kat.

Oh, goodie! I shall add yours to mine: I just went over to LabKat today, and the picture of the cat on the monitor gave me quite a laugh because my cat sleeps beside mine. Were she to try to sleep or sit on top of it, I am certain that catastrophe would follow very quickly.

Everyone here: Kat has a good blog. It has substance, as many blogs do, but it also has just enough quirkiness to be different from and better than the run-of-the-mill stuff. That's an important factor in the Dark Wraith BlogRing entries.


The Dark Wraith skids to the Blogrolling code to get the LabKat entered.

Fri Apr 01, 04:45:17 PM EST