Sunday, January 30, 2005

Analysis:
The Coming Social Security Crisis

No good end comes of denying that there is a catastrophe looming in the Social Security system; neither will anything useful come of talking about solutions for problems that might or might not occur in fourteen, forty-four, or any other far-away number of years. The crisis is right around the corner, it will happen, and no solutions have been offered that would prevent millions of younger Americans from living the last years of their lives in poverty.

Although the fundamentals of what is about to happen are thoroughly covered in any respectable introductory class in financial management, it is only after long training and/or extensive experience that those lessons might soak in far enough for someone to understand the awful and unavoidably ruinous game that is about to be engaged. Read carefully what is to follow. Do not wave your mental hand in the air about how "theories are made to be proved wrong," or some such nonsense. This is not theory; it is the way of the markets, and it will not relent just because the new players need some slack.

Stock markets are the hunting ground of huge investors, some with the power to buy and sell literally hundreds of millions of dollars worth of securities in a single day. At their disposal is instantaneous access to thousands of formal and informal information streams, all pouring through their scope of awareness in real time, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, three hundred and sixty-five days a year. The consciousness of the institutional and other large investors is far beyond that of any given person or group of people within the machinery. Data passes to information, information is processed at the human and computer levels, and the distilled knowledge flows as light-speed rivers across trading screens around the globe as traders make their best moves to the end of profiting under conditions of risk.

Here are the rules of the game:

Rule 1:
The greater the risk, the greater the expected return.
    If you want to make more money, you must bear a higher chance of getting knocked down. You have no business thinking that you'll get the same rate of return, for example, on a corporation's mortgage bonds as you will on that same corporation's stock. The bond is secured, and the coupon (interest) payments must be made before the shareholders can see a dime. Hence, the bond will be a less risky investment than the stock, and it will yield a lower expected return.
Rule 2:
Information more than a few seconds old is worthless.
    You are dabbling in the world of people and machines that are, every second of every day, scouring every possible source of knowledge on the planet about securities and the assets that underlie them. Anything that is worth knowing is immediately and without prejudice pressed into service as purchases and sales of those securities, and the resulting buy and sell orders drive prices up and down, which then telegraphs that original information to every other market participant. If you think you've got the inside scoop on the "big boys," you are a damned fool.
Rule 3:
No one—but NO one—"beats the market."
    The next time you hear about some fund manager whose mutual fund earned way above what all the other mutual funds earned, ask yourself the simple question, based on Rule 1, above: What risk was borne in that portfolio? There is nothing admirable, heroic, or even noteworthy about someone who takes on gobs and gobs of risk just to get a higher return. That's what's supposed to happen. What needs to be disclosed is not how high the fund's return was, but rather, was the risk that was assumed commensurate with that return?

    Think about it this way. Your friend comes into the bar waving a hundred dollar bill. You and the other patrons are impressed, since this fellow is usually mooching drinks off everybody else; but tonight, it's his turn to buy. He tells you that he earned the money betting on one hand of blackjack, and all he had to bet was two dollars. You and the other patrons are now even more impressed, since he was risking very little for a significant return. However, a couple hours and quite a few drinks later, he mentions that if he had lost that hand of 21, not only would he have never seen his two dollars again, but he would also have been forced to surrender one of his kidneys.

    Still think the hundred dollars was a great return? (If you do, you're ready to become one of those financial news commentators who drool all over the latest "genius" portfolio fund manager.)
Rule 4:
For every winner, there will be at least one loser.
    No, all boats don't "rise together." The stock markets are where your money—your chump change, your "I'll-have-some-fun" money, your house payment money, your life savings money, your retirement money—is at best a modest meal for someone who is far richer, smarter, and more powerful than you'll ever dream of being. Deal with it.

    If it's any comfort to you, the faceless guy who takes your life savings isn't any more significant to the stock markets than you are. He's just better at the game than you'll ever be.
Rule 5:
Investment advisers don't sell wealth; they sell a product.
    If you pay someone to tell you how to invest, you will be given the benefit of a tiny shard—a snapshot, if you will—of the mass of information out on the Street. The investment adviser doesn't have time to give you special care. In the grand scheme of Wall Street, you are nothing, and so is he. What you'll get is canned advice about portfolio structures and the securities that would create general risk-versus-expected return profiles. The investment adviser can't sell you a roadmap to Wealth City any more than a television evangelist can sell you a cheap seat on the redeye to Heaven.

Now comes partial privatization of Social Security, where some of you get a real piece of the action in the new "ownership society."

You're going to be allowed to buy stocks with some of your Social Security withholdings. You'll be given a list—a fairly short one at first, but you'll have more options as time goes on. That list will be nice to have for guidance: it will focus your diligent analysis and keep you from spending too much time poring over historical stock price charts and old financials, which are completely useless, anyway, since historical information is already impounded in stock prices (see above). But it's okay if you waste your time looking at stuff like that since it will make you feel like you're one of the financially savvy sorts, especially when you sit at the all-night diner working out which stocks you're going to buy from your government-approved list.

Oh, but wait a minute. If you know what stocks are going to be available when the partial privatization goes into effect, won't the real big dogs know, too? Could that be a little problem?

Recall—if you didn't know it already—that many of the major stock indices have actually suffered negative annualized rates of return over the past four years. Right now, you could say that stock prices are "depressed," meaning that the heavy investors, if they so chose, could move in at fire sale prices. Now, why would they do that?

Well, let's see: tens of millions of suckers are about to start shoveling what will eventually amount to a couple trillion dollars into stocks. The list of what stocks the suckers are going to be allowed to shovel their money into will have already been out there on the Street.

The powerful, smart, capital-flush giants of Wall Street are going to buy in before the enabling legislation is even passed, and they'll do so with huge amounts of capital. They'll be methodical, systematic, and quiet. Of course, they'll be buying in at the depressed prices of the current era, and then they'll wait patiently for the fun to begin. Here comes two trillion dollars of amateurs' retirement money pounding into those stocks, driving their prices upward under surging demand. And there, at the other end of that money elevator, stand all of those big dogs who bought in at the low prices. Note the engraved inscription on their shovel handles; it reads: "Buy low, sell high."

As they sell out at the high prices your stock-buying binge created, suddenly that capital appreciation of yours just starts to wither away. No matter how hard you and your millions of fellow new investors hammer money into the system with buy orders, the shovels will just keep hauling it out the other end.

Oh, and unlike a normal investor who could bail at will on underperforming securities, you won't get to do that: you're in a retirement fund, which means that you have to wait for trading "windows" to open before you can get out. Of course, by the time your exit door opens, your portfolio will already have been stripped of any capital appreciation. Worse, you might even have lost some of the principal, as well, unless the underlying fundamental trend of these past four years somehow, miraculously turns around in the face of rising interest rates, a collapsing dollar, and nose-bleed federal budget deficits.

In other words, future investors, you're going to get your clocks cleaned, and you won't be able to do a thing about it.

But you can look on the bright side: some night very soon, a bunch of rich people are going to have a pretty decent meal with that retirement money of yours.

You can almost hear them saying, "Crisis? What crisis?"




The Dark Wraith has spoken.

<< 94 Comments Total
 Wild Clover blogged...

Having run off to do some testing, I lost the original thread with the questions about the poll problems. I finally held my nose and opened IE and was easily able to vote this time around. The first poll I had a slightly newer version of Opera, so it may be that I have a java problem where the IE emulation of Opera is just not quite good enough for your script. Eventually I'll get around to upgrading, but I was installing bare necessities on the new HD and had the older version burned to CD.

So do you think Bushie will actually succeed in getting his "reform" passed? I'm a bit out of touch, but I've been hearing a fair bit of critism. I may also be missing a huge conservative support just due to my news sources.

Mon Jan 31, 01:15:19 AM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Wild Clover.

Will the partial privatization of Social Security pass Congress?

This is nothing more than a two trillion dollar jobs program for the banking and securities industries, along with a concommitant, government-leverage, pension fund raid just like the ones that were done in the '80s and '90s.

A whole lot of powerful, God-fearing, wealthy people stand to make a whole lot of unwarrent, God-awful, big money on the government's tab, with the final bill being paid down the road through the impoverishment of future retirees and the diminished ability of the federal government to help because it is saddled with service load on federal debt that is staggering beyond comprehension.


In summary, then, this legislation's a winner right out of the starting gates.



The Dark Wraith cannot help but grumble about the madness of it all.

Mon Jan 31, 01:33:50 AM EST  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

Thank you very much for expounding on this topic. I actually started laughing out loud when I read this because of the disingenuousness of what is being perpetrated on the American people. You also nailed perfectly part of the point I was trying to make in my mini rant of Friday evening.

You still have a society where many live beyond their means, and doesn't save enough for the future.

You have an investment vehicle that has plenty of gas, but will pretty much just go in circles.

Man can't live just on principal alone, so what are you going to get? More and more worker bees that work longer and longer.

And so then, where are all these jobs for the 70 year olds going to come from?

Mon Jan 31, 01:01:16 PM EST  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

This post has been removed by the author.

Mon Jan 31, 01:01:33 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

FWIW, while I'm sure there are more than a few financial managers in favor of Shrub's ideas, he does seem to be meeting with some resistance in Congress from his own party. That doesn't mean it's all over (hardly!), but I find that somewhat encouraging (for now).

- oddjob

Mon Jan 31, 01:23:21 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Ahhhhh...

The light, albeit miniscule, is on.

First random-off-the-top-of-my-head question-

If the big dogs do know what options are available for investment, why not just watch their activity pre-legislation and when they start buying, start the buying yourself? Or would it be too hard to differentiate between their purchases as either "SS approved choices" or just run-of-the-mill business?

I think I just lost myself by asking that question, but oh well.

lowlyredstater

Mon Jan 31, 03:07:15 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

There's also just this one other thing about the big dogs that DW's thoughts don't take into consideration. While I realize this may sound a little too pollyanna-ish, the one downside of being a big dog is that the most appreciation (in terms of percentage gain, which is all the big dogs really care about at the end of the day) happens when a company is very small. A good idea that hits big does its biggest explosion at the very beginning of its growth. This is no secret, but it's also no secret that the big dogs have great difficulty cashing in on that kind of action. Their multi-hundred million dollar portfolios are so large they can't get into small corps. like that without distorting the growth, and that makes it difficult for them to get back out later without killing the stock too fast for them to profit nicely from the sale.

So while the micro-investor commands no overwhelming advantage over the big dogs, and is a fool to think he or she might be, there is this one small one.

- oddjob

Mon Jan 31, 03:57:36 PM EST  
 isonomiac blogged...

Good Afternoon Dark Wraith,

I share your concern of the government forcing individuals to invest their retirement in the stock market, and I would like to compliment you on being one of the very few bloggers who cite the possible adverse/distorting impact of the government forcing taxpayers to 'invest' trillions of dollars in the capital markets - markets that were formerly relatively free of government induced distortions. I have two questions that I would like to pose to anyone willing to answer. First, wouldn't the problem of 'big dogs' investing in the 'list' of available funds be at least partially mitigated if individuals were free to invest in whatever stock (or perhaps even commodity) they wished?

And finally, if the paternal government is going to force me to save - because I have been conditioned by the State to believe I am incapable of leading my own life - isn't it better if my family gets to keep the money I saved (and interest income) when I die? With private/personal accounts, workers would be able to pass on to their families the money they are forced to put into Social Security. Under the current regime, when an individual dies, the stream of benefits die with him/her (there are special situations with spouses, but I am talking about bequeathing wealth to children/heirs). Allowing individuals to pass on wealth accumulated through years of toiling away in the mines (or wherever) would go a long way towards helping low income families extricate themselves from povery, would it not?

Mon Jan 31, 04:34:21 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

isonomiac, I know you asked DW, but if I may I'd like to respond also.

Does not the history of IRA's, which are a relatively new phenomenon not becoming really popular until the 1980's, show that while you may be correct about the mitigation, you are also correct that it would most likely only be a very partial one? Does not most IRA $$ go chasing after mutual funds, an investment class in which, over time, >70% of the funds underperform the market?

You speak of being forced to do X with your money rather than save it for your family, but I have two counter questions for you:

1) You speak in absolute terms about what is best, yet those absolute terms don't really apply to the situation, do they? A portion is taxed and goes to qualified recipients (not family), but the rest is not taxed & you are free to do with it as seems best to you, yes?

2) In the environment such as it is, do you know whether in the main what you say would actually be reality? Do you know for sure that it would in fact be better for most Americans to let them have it in the hopes that they save it, never touch it, and let them pass it plus the interest along to their inheritors? If you look at an article I posted earlier today, you will see that today's Americans are noted for how little they already save. Why would you assume that this $$$ would be treated any differently than the disposable income Americans already can save, but don't?

- oddjob

Mon Jan 31, 04:48:20 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

More info. to consider as we ponder Soc. Sec. phase-out.

- oddjob

Mon Jan 31, 05:57:19 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

(Hmmmmph! You have to scroll up one entry to see what I'm trying to link to. Don't know if that's Blogger or me.)

- oddjob

Mon Jan 31, 05:58:58 PM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, isonomiac.

Let me get right down to the questions and issues you raise.

You asked, "[W]ouldn't the problem of 'big dogs' investing in the 'list' of available funds be at least partially mitigated if individuals were free to invest in whatever stock (or perhaps even commodity) they wished?"

Before I answer that question, I should let you know that I am doing so from my perspective as a financial analyst more than from my perspective as an economist. I briefly owned a penny-stock house, and I was involved for quite a few years in the stock markets as a consultant to small companies that were "going public" or had recently done so.

By expropriating money from private citizens—good, bad, or neutral as that might be—the entire chain of events, however it begins, after that is distorted to a greater or lesser extent. If the government takes money from people in Social Security withholdings, it automatically becomes subject to fiduciary duties with respect to the disposition of that money. It cannot waive those duties merely by handing it back to those from whom it has taken the money. Fiduciary duty doesn't work that way.

Once taken, the government cannot give it back to people with a strict, narrow set of dispositions from which they may choose.

Even though, in the past, stockbrokers constantly breached it, they were never supposed to allow a person to invest in a way that was inappropriate to his or her circumstances. To do so was a violation of a fiduciary duty.

By the government handing people money that they are permitted to use only for investments in certain types of securities (generally speaking, this will be stocks and bonds), it is handing back to the brokerage community the role of trying to control investors' fundamental and permanent lack of training and utter cluelessness about the relationship between risk and expected return.

If brokers in the old days were wanting in their diligence with respect to fiduciary duties, they now suffer from even worse, if less personal, flaws.

First, many brokerage houses exist that are nothing more than securities versions online catalogue stores. Prospective investors can move in and out of positions without any human being watching over their portfolio choices, their portfolio architecture strategies, or the soundness of their diversification and control patterns. When a few tens of thousands, or even a few hundreds of thousands, of stupid people buy and sell stocks this way, it's not much of an issue for me or for society: these people are gambling at the Stock Market Casino, and their losses are pretty much just the price of their entertainment package. However, when you're talking about a substantial part of what those people will rely on to get them through the last ten to thirty years of their lives, then it becomes of concern to me; and I dare say, it should be of major concern to society, too.

Isonomiac, you have all the ingredients for catastrophe: unyielding laws of mathematics and physics meeting the uncompromised stupidity of greedy, fun-loving people. It is the financial equivalent of giving dynamite sticks to West Virginian 12-year-old boys: a number of those kids aren't going to live long enough to benefit from the lessons they learned from the TNT.

Investments in high risk/high expected return securities are the world of venture capitalists. That's where the game should be played, even though this drives the cost of capital through the roof for development-stage companies. I saw first-hand what happens when small-time investors played in the world of penny stocks. People lost their entire fortunes; people actually lost their lives.

It took me years to understand that this was no place for any investor who wasn't a cut-throat bastard.

And it certainly wasn't any place for beginners to start.



The Dark Wraith will continue in a while.

Mon Jan 31, 07:15:49 PM EST  
 isonomiac blogged...

Good Morning OddJob,

In response to your first question: You mention how a portion of my (all of our’s, actually) income is taxed, and goes to "qualified" recipients. Are you sure they are qualified? Who is more qualified than I to determine the disposition of my own income? I earned it. The fact is, the determination of exactly who is "qualified" is completely arbitrary. The arbitrary use of the coercive power of government in the attempt to achieve concrete ends is inimical to the notion of individual liberty because it is impossible to do so while at the same time treating everyone equally before the law.

In response to your second question: I subscribe to the belief that individuals should be allowed to seek their own ends, assign their own value to them, and then select the means by which they wish to achieve those ends. To suppose the government knows what is best for the individual – in spite of what the individual believes –is certain to lead down the road to tyranny. You ask “Do you know for sure that it would be better for most Americans to let them have it…” I know this because if contributing to Social Security were voluntary, you would see a decrease in participation. People tend to prefer deciding for themselves the manner in which they spend their own money. They tend to prefer deciding for themselves because only they know what courses of action they expect would bring them the most happiness.

One of the most evil consequences of expropriating wages from individuals for the length of their working life is that many are now forced to depend on SS for their livelihood in their retirement years. The forced savings of SS crowds out private savings for low- income people during their working years so they have no choice in their retirement but to depend upon SS. It is like a self-licking ice cream cone. People clamor that Social Security is a necessity because so many people now rely on it in retirement, when perhaps it is the case that SS actually caused this situation.

So, that was just a couple of my thoughts. Have a good day.

Tue Feb 01, 08:34:50 AM EST  
 isonomiac blogged...

Good Morning Dark Wraith,

You have given me much to think about. When I began looking at this problem last year, I believed that partial privatization would be a beneficial intermediate step in eventually dissolving the Social Security program. However, there is significant danger in government 'encouraging' if you will, (perhaps 'condoning' is a better word) individuals to put their Social Security taxes into private accounts in the stock market. There are definite fiduciary considerations, it is quite likely that stock prices could become politicized (after all, people's retirement incomes are tied to them), and if the bottom were to fall out for some people, the political pressure for the government to guarantee security against the vicissitudes of the market would be overwhelming. We could end up with the worst of both worlds - a vastly distorted capital market which was once the envy of the world, and crippling payroll taxes that only succeed in guaranteeing dependence on the government upon retirement.

As I see it, and I realize you likely have a different opinion, there seem to be few redeeming qualities to privatization (though the ability to pass on wealth to ones heirs is very important), and even fewer for maintaining the status quo.

Tue Feb 01, 08:52:08 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Isonomiac, arguing in favor of a paradigm in which nearly 50% of senior citizens are in poverty (pre Soc. Sec.), rather than the present 8%, is hardly rational, regardless of whether you think it's tyrannical or not.

To hold to such beliefs out of dogma, when the data plainly show your belief to be a public harm is simply foolish - but typical of a libertarian.

Enjoy your devotion to von Mieses.

- oddjob

Tue Feb 01, 09:13:40 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

It's interesting that you should comment upon "all boats going up" (when the tide comes in). When I first heard that mentioned during the Reagan Administration I had a problem with it as an analogy even then.

When the tide comes in, rather than making the leaky boats go up doesn't it mostly just give them the opportunity to take on that much more water?

- oddjob

Tue Feb 01, 01:26:32 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Isonomiac,

You are right that under better conditions we wouldn't need Social Security. When someone falls ill or on hard times, some generous, caring soul from the community would take that person in.

In these times and under these circumstances, we can't afford to get rid of Social Security (as it was meant to work), because the ones most willing to help would be the ones least able to afford it. Short of pleading with the entire community to raise money on behalf of their loved ones, there would be little help for the poor if Social Security were to be eradicated at this time.

Since the rich aren't known for giving unless something is in it for them or unless it were pried from them, the Social Security system was designed. Evidently, a large enough amount of people with wealth were not being kind and generous of their own volition, so the government gave them a little push.

However, it's likely the same rich people who despise money being involuntarily extracted from their incomes to help the nameless, faceless, random downcast are the same people who would revulse with horror at the thought of welcoming one of the personal, breathing, tangible downcast into their homes.

I realize the rich are not the only ones who deposit into the system. You've specifically referred to the poor. I ask, pray tell, why in the world the POOR are required to give into the system, seeing as they're precisely the ones who theoretically benefit from it the most and for whom the system was designed.

You're right about the crippling effect. We're told that we're supposed to quit being productive members of society at a certain age, and should spend the rest of our lives on vacation.

Look at the bright side: The retirement age will likely continue to rise, and people should get out of the bad habit of saying like a broken record "When are you going to retire?" So maybe the elders of our land will finally get the respect and opportunities they deserve. Or not.

wiseguy

Tue Feb 01, 02:06:01 PM EST  
 PeterofLoneTree blogged...

If the retirement age continues to rise, perhaps we can change the comment, "When are you going to retire"? to "When are you going to die"?

Tue Feb 01, 02:42:33 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

For myself, I have never had a problem with a rise in the retirement age. When Soc. Sec. was initiated the avg. life expectancy was 67, when the retirement age was 65. That's a hell of a big difference from now!

- oddjob

Tue Feb 01, 03:54:13 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

It wouldn't surprise me, Peter of Lone Tree.

We as a nation have an awful fetish with the "youth" and "the children" and what they have to offer, without lifting a seasoned hand to help them.

It's high time our elderly were not regarded as burdens. If they are infirm, we should take care of them, and willingly. If they are able to work well into their 90s and that is what they want to do, we should not discriminate against them just because a pretty blond in her 20s is vying for the same position.

We as a country are ashamed of aging, and ashamed of getting wiser. Keeping youthful is a good thing if we can stay on our toes and be of sharp wit, but it is a deadly distraction if it is just a lousy excuse to keep seasoned, effective, highly knowledgeable workers out of the workplace in order to draw like magnets ineffective, attractive, toadies.

So the first thing that should go is the dress code in all businesses across America. Bold, yes. But it might do the trick. More to do is made over those stupid interviews than the actual job itself. A willing heart and capable hands should be all that is required. Ph.D.s don't impress me. Experience doesn't impress me. Rewards and bonuses don't impress me. If you can talk to me and I can talk to you, and we can actually get somewhere, -that- impresses me.

Popularity doesn't impress me, either. That's why I'm still anonymous, here. My ideas have to float on their own, first.

wiseguy

Tue Feb 01, 03:57:41 PM EST  
 My Pet Goat blogged...

Raw Story has acquired a copy of Saving Social Security: A Guide to Social Security Reform, printed by the House and Senate Republican Conferences as a guide for Senators and Representatives to market private accounts for the Social Security system.This is a must read for anyone interested in the future of SS. Go Here

Tue Feb 01, 04:30:30 PM EST  
 LindiBee blogged...

But, don't most schools of conservative economic theory presuppose the free flow of information amongst all participants? Do any of them consider the effect of vital information being either deliberately withheld from people who are directly effected by it, or available only to the highest bidder (think- Enron, Global Crossing, etc). Also, what happens when powerful alliances form that can very effectively present massive disinformation/misinformation about a product, or candidate, or issue, and sources of unbiased information that can complete a person's information set are difficult to impossible to obtain?

Tue Feb 01, 08:31:38 PM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, Lindi Bee.

This has been one of those long days, and I must apologize to all for having not thrown in my own two cents worth before this hour. I am especially regretful since this convesation is, in my judgment, one of the more important discussions that could be engaged by intellectuals. Rarely do we have an opportunity to put into open, relatively non-acrimonious dialogues such issues as the foundations of economic thought, assumptive bases, and political consequences.

To your point about what we call "asymmetric information." You are correct that the Classical model did not admit to differential information access and control, although even Adam Smith hinted broadly at it in regard to the essential importance of non-concentrated markets. Despite being adamantly opposed to government interference in the normal course, decisions, and effects of enterprise, he was dead-set against against monopolies and cartels, which have at their heart asymmetric access to information.

In recent years, economists have dealt substantively with information markets as part of the overall matrix of economic activity, and game theorists have done extensive work in the area of information accessibility, control, and availability.

Even in my introductory micro- and macroeconomic classes, I deal with information as a fundamental commodity: because we assume that all economic agents act rationally and in their own self-interest, I must make students aware that what seem to be entirely irrational acts by people are nothing more than choices made under uncertainty, part of which comes from lack of complete information. (In this regard, I talk about certain winners of Darwin Awards so that I can point out how information deficiencies can lead to death, and how such untimely and well-publicized deaths lead to greater "completeness" of information among those who read about the deceased and how he became that way.)

That having been said, you must understand that, in Classical economics, we deal with actions of the "marginal" economic agent. In practical terms, that means the economic agent with the most complete access to capital markets, information markets, and resource markets.

That was one of the points I made in the article that commenced this thread. The people who live, eat, and breathe securities markets are in a world so far removed from the normal experience of amateur investors that its like feeding plankton to whales when the amateurs try to play in that world. No amount of effort by the typical person on Main Street would put that individual as an investor on a level playing field with those large dogs.

This is why I spend a great deal of time in investments classes talking about the plain, old, vanilla brand of "balanced portfolio." Do nothing whatsoever fancy: purchase a diversified portfolio of equities and bonds that removes as much of the unrewarded risk as possible. Use classical measures, like "beta," to establish a risk structure consistent with your goals, your ability to sustain losses, and the general condition of your cardio-vascular system (this last parameter being in place so that we don't have people with weak hearts twitching off as their high-beta portfolios whip-saw up and down every day).

The securities markets are pretty much smooth with respect to information access and distribution. The big dogs wouldn't have it any other way. If some desired bit of information is not available, someone will get it. And even if it's insider information, the minute any investor of note acts upon it, the resulting price signal sets off alarm bells for other heavy investors.

The loser in all of this is the fool who doesn't know that he's outclassed, outgunned, and outnumbered in that shooting gallery. I've had people who were exposed to the tune of a million dollars tell me all about their portfolios, their "thoughts about the direction of the market," and all sorts of nonsense about what "trading systems" and "charting programs" are the best. In their presence, I provide them with the appropriately courteous appearance of being impressed with both their investment acumen, and their vast capital contribution to the health and well being of the stock markets. In their absence, however, I think to myself...

Well, I just think to myself, "What a wonderful world."



The Dark Wraith moves on with the night's blogging.

Tue Feb 01, 11:32:08 PM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good evening, isonomiac.

I wanted to address to important issues you brought up.

First, you correctly assessed a key component of my opposition to the partial privatization of Social Security. It is, at its heart, nothing but an appalling industry subsidy: millions of younger Americans will have a tax (that has been around for years) turned into a nearly forced contribution to the securities and banking sectors of the economy.

Whether or not you have been a regular on this blog long enough to know my economic philosophy, I am an old-time conservative (now derisively called a "Rockefeller" or an "Eisenhower" type). Dragging money out of people's pockets, then inducing them to take that money back for the purpose of propping up an industry that in no way, shape, or form needs help is simply and patently outrageous on its face.

It is, in my way of thinking, almost a natural evolution of state governments getting into the business of lotteries, where people are induced to play games of chance that are tantamount to regressive taxes. At least with the lotteries, however, people don't have money taxed from their pockets and then offered back to them if they'll play the numbers. With this partial privatization of Social Security, that confiscatory upgrade will go fully into effect.

Second issue: you talked about inter-generational wealth transfer. I don't know how familiar you are with the writings of the Founding Fathers of our country, but there were more than a few of them who had a real problem with that idea; and because there was a clear concensus among those thinkers and politicians that intergenerational wealth transfer was a bad idea, it has been considered something to be militated against ever since, except among the very wealthy, who always frame the argument in terms of some hapless widow whose deceased husband's estate was taxed away, leaving her destitute.

Here's the gist of why it is a good idea to stop wealth from moving from one generation to the next: the rise of a nobility class.

In the minds of the architects of this nation, there was no place for the ancient European vexation of men and women who were privileged merely because they were born of privilege. Each generation benefits enormously from the cumulative efforts of the world that has gone before; and this is especially true in a growing, agricultural/industrial society such as the federation of states that was emerging as a nation. To ensure the continued growth of the nation through the ambition and enterprise of its citizens, it simply could not afford a class at leisure to dabble as it fancied in the affairs of state, business, and even academia.

No more galling experience of the bright, hungry, ambitious young man could be found than to see his wealthy young peer who always got the best attentions, the best positions, and who was always praised as the most brilliant, the most athletic, and the handsomest.

The American experience was to be different: bust your ass and maybe, just maybe, you could get ahead.

Obviously, that was highly fanciful and quite hypocritical coming as it did in a time of racist slavery and sexist disenfranchisement. But the important thing was—and still is, even more so today, I would argue—that the suppression of intergenerational wealth is the suppression of blood nobility. And as our society has grudgingly yielded one form of discrimination after another (a task that is far, far from complete), the newly freed groups may enter a stream of opportunity free of sniffing young rich kids who never did a real day's work in their sorry lives.

Whether or not we have that kind of a country is not the point; the point is that this is the country we should have. And by God, if it takes taxing every last red cent out of a dead, rich man's hide, then so be it, if that's the way we give the next generation's bright, hungry, and ambitious young folks (like you, my friend) the fair shot they deserve in a free society.



The Dark Wraith has spoken.

Wed Feb 02, 12:18:34 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

I couldn't agree with you more (almost).

I had plenty of friends with filthy rich parents who didn't have to work in high school and still don't in college and, out of bitterness, I want to see them struggle in the real world. But mommy and daddy buy cars, buy/rent houses, and the stupid mistakes they make before they are 25 become insignificant. And it makes my blood boil.

But, for a parent who does discipline their child and raise them to not be like Paris Hilton, shouldn't they be able to make sure their kids are going to be ok if something happens(death)? I've been told by adults that raising and protecting a child was the most important thing they ever did in life. I know I would want every penny I worked for to go to my children. No offense to charities, but my children will mean more to me than the rest of the world combined. That's where I want my money going. Why should the government demand otherwise?


lowlyredstater

Wed Feb 02, 12:46:37 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

lowlyredstater, do you see that your sentiment for your children to be is the same one creating your filthy rich, spoiled brat fellow students? (I'm not suggesting you will do that if you really "make it", but I'm asking you to think about something.)

- oddjob

Wed Feb 02, 09:46:01 AM EST  
 isonomiac blogged...

Good Afternoon Dark Wraith,

I believe there are some important differences between a noble aristocratic class of Europe and the wealthy capitalist ‘class’ that arises because Americans are allowed to pass onto their heirs some portion of the wealth they accumulated during their life. First, I would suggest that the sources of the wealth are somewhat different. How did the aristocratic class of old Europe acquire their riches? By taxation or some other form of pludering? Whereas people in America actually make/create their wealth by satisfying the most urgent demands of consumers. The noble class of Europe has/had no obligation to anyone – they did as they pleased at the expense of those they impoverished. However, capitalists must continue to endeavor to apply their capital to satisfy society’s demands. If they do not, they will lose it to some other capitalist who is more proficient at giving the market what it wants. The market decides on a daily basis what the distribution of income is, and rewards those who satisy consumers most efficiently. Paris Hilton can live the life she leads because her father is exceptionally adept at fulfilling demand. If he weren’t, his hotel chain (or the capital therein), would be acquired by somebody more proficient, and Paris would have to get a job.

Suppose you don’t buy the argument that the source of the wealth is a critically important difference. Perhaps you don’t think it’s ‘right’ that ambitious hard-working people have to scratch and claw their way up while debutants simply live off their trust funds. One might argue that the presence of such wealth and privilege destroys the incentive to be productive members of society. So the proposal is to tax wealthy individuals so as to prevent them from passing their fortune on to their heirs and taking the money and redistributing it to those ‘less fortunate.’ What does that do to their (the recipients’) incentives to be productive members of society? The first effect of the incentive is to condition them to believe it is not always necessary to do anything productive in order to receive remuneration. They need only seek a handout from the government. The second effect is to deter them from striving at their fullest to become wealthy (read: satisfy society's demands) because it will only be expropriated at a later date.

It may be quite annoying to know spoiled brats who have always had everything handed to them, and probably always will. But I would suggest the cure is worse than the disease. The benefit of allowing individuals the right to use their wealth in the manner of their choosing (consistent with the rules of just conduct) is that everyone’s chances of prospering are better. This right must certainly extend to the bequeathal of a portion of this wealth to his/her heirs. What’s more, we are protected to a great extent from the creation of an ‘aristocracy’ or purely privileged class due to the fact that the market ensures that capital is in the hands of those who employ it most efficiently. The cost of revoking this right (bequeathing) would be yet another arbitrary use of coercion on the part of the government(Who is to decide what is an acceptable amount to leave one’s heirs? What if one gives the bequeathal before they die? Who should receive the redistributed income?) as well as serious adverse effects to incentives.

The Founding Fathers were justified in their concern that the rise of an aristocracy is in conflict with the American notion of rugged individualism and the idea that individuals should have an equal opportunity to succeed and prosper. However, relying on the largesse of the State is not exactly a principle exemplified by the Founding Fathers either.

Have a good day.

Wed Feb 02, 01:05:58 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

But I think there is a difference.

I noted

for a parent who does discipline their child and raise them to not be like Paris HiltonIn other words, parents who don't throw money at their kids to make them happy and actually teach them discipline should be allowed to leave everything with their child. Since there is no litmus test to perform to see whether or not a child is worthy of inheritance(read spoiled brat), then you have to let everyone hand down their assets.

With the good(young, productive members of society who now have some security because of the inheritance) comes the bad(stupid spoiled whores like the one I saw on "My Super Sweet 16" last night on MTV...her dad dropped 200,000 for her birthday, although to be fair, that price did include her brand new Land Rover).

Wed Feb 02, 01:18:53 PM EST  
 Dark Wraith blogged...

Good afternoon, isonomiac. Thank you for your response.

One of the four fundamental property rights, as I set forth in "Analysis: The Hard Land" is the right of transfer. This, however, is a right—as are all rights—that must comport with lawful statutes and the prevailing understanding of "public policy": just because I convey my land in a wealthy suburban neighborhood through will to a company that engages exclusively in strip mining activities does not mean that such conveyance will not be challenged or that the company so benefiting may proceed to use the land in the manner to which it has comparative advantage in enterprise.

More broadly, common law is quite adept at constructing limits on the ends to which property can be transferred through estate. A minor cannot hold fee simple title to realty even if the title was such in the conveyance by estate.

You are correct that I reject the argument that the American nobility is different from the European nobility because of the origins of the wealth. In economics and finance, historical foundations of the current state of a system are irrelevant. We call such processes, which pervade everything from financial and economic markets to traffic and games, "Markovian": the history of the process is impounded in its current state; and therefore, that history cannot be used to determine future states. A game of chess is Markovian: how the board got to its current position is entirely irrelevant to determining an optimal move from where it is. (This is why you can see some of those chess wizards playing against many opponents at once. They don't have to remember anything at all; they merely have to look at the boards' current states to decide on the best move to make.)

How a rich person by inheritance came to be rich is irrelevant, as well. I cannot care whether he is rich by virtue his forefathers' great entrpreneurial efforts or by his forefathers' brutal confiscation of productive worth of others. All I should care about is what that person will do today for the world tomorrow. If the asymmetric wealth creates growth that includes jobs, prosperity, and a good world after this day, then his wealth was to good end, and he will not be denied that by any reasonable political process.

If, however, that capitalist uses his wealth to the end of servicing his and his own class's needs at the expense of those who are not as fortunate, we enter into the death cycle that Marxist theory posited as the historical inevitability of capitalism's excess and fundamental flaw. As it stands right now, Marx's Manifesto of the Communist Party is dead-straight-on in describing the scenario of the run-up to his fantasy revolution of the "proletarians." If you don't believe that, read only the first two sections, where he describes the degradation of the professional class to mere wage earners in a diminished engine that would ultimately lead to destructive supply/demand imbalances.

If we don't heed the warning signs of the emergence of those "controllers of resources" and what they ultimately do, out of their own Austrian Economics ideal of "enlightened" self-interest, we're going have that middle class break apart and start to feed the discontent downward into the proletarians, who will then wreck the system we have worked so hard to create in this phenomenal experiment called the United States.

I would argue that the current Administration is precisely that warning shot of a massive political imbalance that is going to swing more and more wildly through the first half of the current Century; and that instability will ultimately&$151;if it is not brought under control very soon—will lead to one version or another of authoritarianism just to stop the destructive cycles.

(Have you noticed all of the "fiction" being written recently about military coups here in the United States? They are being written by current and former military officers.)

This is not the place to question either the wisdom of our Founding Fathers or the brutal predictions of our sworn enemy of capitalism. The downside risk is just not worth the payoff to a small clutch of spoiled rich kids who control capital merely because some ancestor was ambitious.


The Dark Wraith has spoken.

Wed Feb 02, 02:18:49 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

But there´s a difference.

I noted

for a parent who does discipline their child and raise them to not be like Paris HiltonIn other words, what about those children who are raised properly, and aren't spoiled. Shouldn't their parents be allowed to provide for them? Since there is no litmus test to take that deems you worthy of an inheritance or not, you have to let everyone benefit from it.

With the good (children who are good people and could use the security of an inheritance), comes the bad. (like the stupid spoiled whore I saw on MTV last night on the show "My Sweet 16"...her dad dropped 200 grand on her birthday. But, to be fair, that did include the price of her new Land Rover.)

lowlyredstater

Wed Feb 02, 03:11:53 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

But there´s a difference.

I noted

for a parent who does discipline their child and raise them to not be like Paris HiltonIn other words, what about those children who are raised properly, and aren't spoiled. Shouldn't their parents be allowed to provide for them? Since there is no litmus test to take that deems you worthy of an inheritance or not, you have to let everyone benefit from it.

With the good (children who are good people and could use the security of an inheritance), comes the bad. (like the stupid spoiled whore I saw on MTV last night on the show "My Sweet 16"...her dad dropped 200 grand on her birthday. But, to be fair, that did include the price of her new Land Rover.)

lowlyredstater

Wed Feb 02, 03:12:18 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

my apologies, I have no explanation for the triple post.

Wed Feb 02, 03:17:52 PM EST  
 isonomiac blogged...

Good Afternoon Dark Wraith,

You wrote "if it [the current administration]is not brought under control very soon—will lead to one version or another of authoritarianism just to stop the destructive cycles." It is really quite fascinating to me that while we have widely disparate views we both reach the same conclusion on a not insignificant number of topics. (Though in all fairness, I believe I would hold this particular view regardless of the party that held the white house.)

Anyway, it's been entertaining and challenging, per usual. Have a good day.

Wed Feb 02, 04:09:05 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

"I just came across your blog about **keyword** and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site & blog about free list of penny stock so I know what I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!"

Fri Sep 30, 07:35:11 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

"I just came across your blog about **keyword** and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site & blog about penny stock keyword so I know what I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!"

Fri Sep 30, 09:43:41 PM EDT  
 Don blogged...

Hello, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!
I have a work at home lead site. It pretty much covers work at home lead related stuff. Check it out if you get time :-)

Sun Oct 02, 02:09:11 AM EDT  
 Shock Carlos blogged...

Hey, you have a very interesting blog here. You might be interested in checking out my web hosting packages site/blog if you get a chance.

It primarily relates to narketing, online services and web hosting packages type stuff. Come on by soon.

Mon Oct 03, 11:47:20 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

california mobile home association
Information => california mobile home association

Mon Oct 03, 11:54:13 PM EDT  
 Cyber Financial Corporation blogged...

Hi,

I liked your blog. I found many interesting information here.
I also give free info about marketing strategy. You can seen it on my marketing strategy site.

If you have time please visit my web site to get some free marketing strategy information.

Kind regards,
Nick

Tue Oct 04, 02:21:35 AM EDT  
 Cyber Financial Corporation blogged...

Hi,

I liked your blog. I found many interesting information here.
I also give free info about marketing and advertising. You can seen it on my marketing and advertising site.

If you have time please visit my web site to get some free marketing and advertising information.

Kind regards,
Nick

Tue Oct 04, 02:23:22 AM EDT  
 Get-A-Free-House blogged...

How would you like to own a custom-built house at a 42% to 100% discount? Find out how today by visiting Get-A-Free-House.com

Tue Oct 04, 05:32:16 AM EDT  
 adsense_cash blogged...

now that's a blog... nice work kimosabee.. u should go daddy domain registration partner on your own web site a instead of here!

Wed Oct 05, 05:19:45 PM EDT  
 Jack Naka blogged...

Nice blog. Please check out my india fashion site. It is all about india fashion informations.

Thu Oct 06, 01:34:25 AM EDT  
 WorldTrader blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a e currency business site, Check it out. It pretty much covers ##KEYWORD## related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sat Oct 08, 09:46:25 AM EDT  
 Rich Molumby blogged...

I have an E-Cash Machine site/blog. It pretty much covers Making money on the web.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Sat Oct 08, 12:10:11 PM EDT  
 Online Incomes blogged...

Nice blog, keep up the good work!
I have a blog/site tootexas home equity loan
It's a free information site on on home equity loans and refinancing. It can help you save money if you are in the market for a loan.
You should check it out if you have the time :-)

Sat Oct 08, 12:34:00 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

I just came across your blog about online casino gambling site and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site & blog about online casino gambling site so I know I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!"

Sun Oct 09, 08:44:58 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Your message on consolidation is great! I have a site on consolidate debt newfoundland
Your readers might find interesting. You can check it out at: http://www.apexconsolidation.com

Sun Oct 09, 10:54:24 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

So this is where all the mortgage amortization information is, I thought I did a good job on my site, but I am humbled. Maybe someone can take a look at my site at mortgage amortization and tell me where I can improve.
Very nice site!!

Mon Oct 10, 01:39:28 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!
I have a **WEB HOSTING** site/. It pretty much covers WEB HOSTING related stuff.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Mon Oct 10, 06:06:25 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here!

I have a cheapest hosting web site. It pretty much covers ##WEB HOSTING## related stuff.

We have business and personal web hosting packages. No setup fees. Low cost domain registration, SSL certificates, merchant accounts and web design.

Come and check it out if you get time.

Mon Oct 10, 05:33:03 PM EDT  
 Online Incomes blogged...

Hi I was just blog surfing and I found You! nice blog!
I have a consolidation consolidation debt debt equity home home loan loan loan loan mortgage mortgage refinancing site/blog
It's a free information site on home equity loans and financeing
You should check it out if you get chance :-)

Mon Oct 10, 06:42:54 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here!

I have a ks pc repair wichita site. It pretty much covers ##PC Repair## related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time.

Mon Oct 10, 11:51:02 PM EDT  
 FXGUY blogged...

Enjoyed your blog - thanks for sharing. I also have an interest in forex option. If you have time, check out my site forex option. Thanks for taking the time to share your blog.

Tue Oct 11, 03:33:43 PM EDT  
 Livenwealthy blogged...

So many blogs and only 10 numbers to rate them. I'll have to give you a 9 because you have a quailty topic.

Free Access To More Information Abouttravel to orlando

Tue Oct 11, 08:44:42 PM EDT  
 WorldTrader blogged...

Thank you, Lot of Valuable Info on Your Blog. I have a learn fx trading Site.

It pretty much covers learn fx trading related stuff.

Check it out if you get time :-)

Wed Oct 12, 08:04:39 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

You have done a great job on setting up your Blog. Your site will definately be bookmarked.

I am in the process of setting up a estate information investing real
site. It's basically a resource site which covers estate information investing real
related stuff.

Please let me know what you think if you have time to check it out.

Wed Oct 12, 10:45:45 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark your site!

I have a in investing market stock
site. It pretty much covers in investing market stock
related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :--)

Wed Oct 12, 11:55:54 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Now you could find Classes for a multitude of subjects on your area , like class find old place yearbooks and they could be found by visiting class find old place yearbooks

Mon Oct 17, 10:26:06 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hi!
I'm a true ohio republican party

I am sure that the readers of your blog
are interested in reading about
ohio republican party

Here's the website where they can!
ohio republican party

Mon Oct 17, 11:47:56 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

I've seen lots of sites about ecommerce web site development but your site is one of the best. Check out my website about website design bathurst

Tue Oct 18, 10:41:54 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hi,

I've got a blackjack strategy website with some original articles related to learn to play black jack that your visitors may find interesting - here's an extract of an article:

Use Blackjack Basic Strategy to Maximize Your Profits!
A blackjack basic strategy cuts the casino edge and most players know this, but what most players ...

learn to play black jack


Thanks

Thu Oct 20, 01:14:01 PM EDT  
 Danny White blogged...

Nice blog! I have a free lead play sony station site I thought you and your visitors might like.

Click on free lead play sony station to check it out. free lead play sony station

Thu Oct 20, 09:33:58 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Cool blog you have. I have a yamaha bass clarinets
related site. Check it out if you get a chance. The URL is yamaha bass clarinets

Fri Oct 21, 09:25:26 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hi,

I was just looking around the net for web sites related to love relationship advice and came across your blog. I was going to add a blog to my site, for love relationship advice and of course other related material, but I'm not sure if it would work.
I'm a bit worried about getting un-wanted 'rude' posts rather than ones related to love relationship advice on my site...... perhaps I just try it out - then you can come and post on it :)

Take care
Stewart

Sat Oct 22, 02:47:14 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

This is a good post. I have a site about atlanta real estate please look at it if you can.

Mon Oct 24, 07:10:43 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

egold malaysia is pretty cool....

egold malaysia has a great egold casino. It's easy money. They use egold and are fair an honest. I highly recommend them and think you would enjoy egold malaysia at egold malaysia

Tue Oct 25, 05:59:26 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

I just came across your blog, and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a free stock trading system blog, so I know what I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!

Wed Oct 26, 08:28:46 PM EDT  
 . blogged...

I just came across your blog, and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a stock trading pick blog, so I know what I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!

Thu Oct 27, 02:06:50 PM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

I think you're right on track and not many people are willing to admit that they share your views. matthew fox biography is an AWESOME place to discuss LOST.

Fri Oct 28, 03:52:23 PM EDT  
 Casino online blogged...

bad greedy online gambling casino Nel nostro sito molte informazioni: bad greedy online gambling casino Una guida ai giocatori online: bad greedy online gambling casino Per i professionisti del gioco e per i nuovi giocatori, visita i siti bad greedy online gambling casino troverai quello che stai cercando, per ulteriori informazioni riguardo bad greedy online gambling casino visita il siti Casino pubblicati in questa guida. Software gratis sia per il download che per il gioco, ma puoi giocare anche con soldi reali. Gioca ora ai migliori casinò online della rete internet con le più alte probabilità di vincita, selezionati e verificati da professionisti del gioco d'azzardo. Scegli il tuo casinò, gioca ora! Provare per credere. bad greedy online gambling casino

Fri Oct 28, 05:43:14 PM EDT  
 Casino online blogged...

online gambling and sports bet casino Nel nostro sito molte informazioni: online gambling and sports bet casino Una guida ai giocatori online: online gambling and sports bet casino Per i professionisti del gioco e per i nuovi giocatori, visita i siti online gambling and sports bet casino troverai quello che stai cercando, per ulteriori informazioni riguardo online gambling and sports bet casino visita il siti Casino pubblicati in questa guida. Software gratis sia per il download che per il gioco, ma puoi giocare anche con soldi reali. Gioca ora ai migliori casinò online della rete internet con le più alte probabilità di vincita, selezionati e verificati da professionisti del gioco d'azzardo. Scegli il tuo casinò, gioca ora! Provare per credere. online gambling and sports bet casino

Sat Oct 29, 11:53:45 AM EDT  
 Casino online blogged...

online casino advertising Best casino directory online casino advertising free game online. About casino online promotion casino online review, online casino advertising slot of casino new online casino gambling internet online is casino online poker (casino gambling guide online) casino free gambling money online casino online sultan of bonus casino online casino advertising . The casino gaming online casino internet online. online casino advertising

Sat Oct 29, 05:54:57 PM EDT  
 acoach2 blogged...

Great blog here! I'll be back. I also have a site devoted tonewsletter swing trading.
It covers many interesting ideas related to newsletter swing trading. Stop by if you get time and get a free 3 week free subscription.

Wed Nov 02, 04:28:21 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Stock Alert - FPPL On The Rise!

Mon Nov 07, 01:35:55 AM EST  
 vwutt blogged...

Craps is the fastest - and certainly the loudest - game in the casino. With the big, colorful table, chips flying everywhere and players yelling, it's exiting to watch and exciting to play. Craps also has the one of the lowest house edges against you of any casino game, but only if you
make the right bets. More about online gambling links

Mon Nov 07, 04:11:55 AM EST  
 Blog World blogged...

A dying man needs to die, as a sleepy man needs to sleep, and there comes a time when it is wrong, as well as useless, to resist.
Stewart Alsop- Posters.

Mon Nov 21, 07:49:12 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

I found your blog on alarm car two way while searching the web and wanted to tell you it is great. Feel free to have your participants view alarm car two way for more great ideas.

Tue Nov 22, 03:40:59 PM EST  
 kleinoooo blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a financial seminar marketing site. It pretty much covers registered rep and insurance seminars.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Tue Nov 22, 07:13:32 PM EST  
 gladys99 blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a speaker bureau site. It pretty much covers financial speaker related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Tue Nov 22, 09:13:03 PM EST  
 home line of credit blogged...

A

Mon Nov 28, 11:17:43 PM EST  
 home equity line of credit blogged...

A

Tue Nov 29, 12:52:38 PM EST  
 Car Man blogged...

You should buy cars.

Wed Dec 21, 05:19:16 PM EST  
 Mortgage Center blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a mortgage calc site/blog. It pretty much covers mortgage calc related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Sat Dec 24, 03:14:34 AM EST  
 Mortgage Center blogged...

Hi, Thanks for your interesting blog. Keep up the great work! I also have a site & blog about mortgage calc, please feel free to visit.

Sun Dec 25, 04:08:52 PM EST  
 Investment Center blogged...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a 101 investing
site/blog. It pretty much covers 101 investing
related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

Sun Jan 08, 12:17:53 AM EST  
 nexus pheromone blogged...

good post

Sun Jan 08, 01:23:41 PM EST  
 Zovirax blogged...

Hi,

This certain decorous blog can be a sort of helping hand to me. I wish to start a decorous blog using same blogger account as this.

Can anyone please tell me how to make a decorous blog similar to this? I want many visitors for my decorous blog but do not know how...

Any idea is appreciated.
You can email me to karlsult@gmail.com too.

Thanks,
decorous blog

Sat Jan 28, 04:12:40 PM EST  
 intuition day trading blogged...

Very interesting blog.

Regards,
Emini Futures Day Trader
intuition day trading

Thu Apr 27, 08:55:33 AM EDT  
 Anonymous blogged...

claritin
claritin d
claritin side effects
allegra claritin vs
claritin reditab
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/allegra-vs-claritin.html ]allegra vs claritin[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-allegra-zyrtec.html ]claritin allegra zyrtec[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/2bfast-claritin.html ]2bfast claritin[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-allegra.html ]claritin allegra[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-redi-tab.html ]claritin redi tab[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/allegra-claritin.html ] allegra claritin[/URL]
claritin generic allegra
allegra vs claritin
claritin allegra zyrtec
2bfast claritin
claritin allegra
claritin redi tab
allegra claritin
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin.html ]claritin[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-d.html ]claritin d[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-side-effects.html ]claritin side effects[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/allegra-claritin-vs.html ]allegra claritin vs[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-reditab.html ]claritin reditab[/URL]
[URL= http://pha2007.netfirms.com/claritin-generic-allegra.html ]claritin generic allegra[/URL]

Wed Dec 13, 01:36:51 PM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Vino
Vendita Vino
Vino Italiano
Vino Bianco
Vendita Vino Da Collezione
Vino Rossi
Prezzo Vino
Bottiglia Di Vino
Acquisto Vino
Accessorio Vino
Vendita Vino on Line
Vino Vendita
Vino Online
Vino Siciliani
Vino Puglia
Vendita Vino Online
Produttori Vino
Vino on Line
Vendita Vino Italiano
Vino Francesi
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino.html ]Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vendita-Vino.html ]Vendita Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Italiano.html ]Vino Italiano[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Bianco.html ]Vino Bianco[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vendita-Vino-Da-Collezione.html ]Vendita Vino Da Collezione[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Rossi.html ]Vino Rossi[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Prezzo-Vino.html ]Prezzo Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Bottiglia-Di-Vino.html ]Bottiglia Di Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Acquisto-Vino.html ]Acquisto Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Accessorio-Vino.html ]Accessorio Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vendita-Vino-on-Line.html ]Vendita Vino on Line[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Vendita.html ]Vino Vendita[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Online.html ]Vino Online[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Siciliani.html ]Vino Siciliani[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Puglia.html ]Vino Puglia[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vendita-Vino-Online.html ]Vendita Vino Online[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Produttori-Vino.html ]Produttori Vino[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-on-Line.html ]Vino on Line[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vendita-Vino-Italiano.html ]Vendita Vino Italiano[/URL]
[URL=http://0italy.org/Vino-Francesi.html ]Vino Francesi[/URL]

Wed Dec 20, 10:50:51 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hello www.dark-wraith.blogspot.com ! :)
A young couple on the brink of divorce visit a marriage counsellor. The counsellor asks the wife what is the problem.
She responds "My husband suffers from premature ejaculation."
The counsellor turns to her husband and inquires "Is that true?"
The husband replies "Well not exactly, it's her that suffers not me."


computer blog
[url=http://laptop-battery.bapti.info/battery-charger-laptop.html]battery charger laptop[/url]

Sat Feb 10, 07:33:11 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Hey guys, there's another English person about, :)
I'm a new on www.dark-wraith.blogspot.com
looking forward to speaking to you guys soon

Tue Feb 13, 12:49:26 AM EST  
 Anonymous blogged...

Watiti.com
Join me and my circle of friends at http://www.watiti.com, an online social networking community that connects people from all over the world.

Meet new people, share photos, create or attend events, post free classifieds, send free e-cards, listen music, read blogs, upload videos, be part of a club, chat rooms, forum and much more!

See you around! Bring all your friends too!

Watiti.com

Tue Feb 13, 06:46:24 AM EST